Dvaderv2
|
Semtex
editHey there. I have seen that you edited the plastic explosive article to state that Mondial Defence and Chemring were manufacturing Semtex. That would be incorrect, as Semtex is a trade name registered worldwide by Explosia a.s. and the variants are patented. No serious company in a country with rule of law can just simply start manufacturing a patented product under a registered trade name and Explosia a.s. has not authorised any outside company to manufacture Semtex. As to Mondial Defense, it is a now defunct British defense industry company which never had any manufacturing capacity for explosives whatsoever, they just bought the explosives at proper manufacturers and shipped them worldwide. It would be conceivable that Mondial did buy bulk explosives and manufactured charges of it (such as demolition slabs of C4 or Semtex), but in the case of Semtex Razor, this certainly was not the case. As to Chemring, they do have a manufacturing plant at Ardeer I think, but again, Explosia a.s. did not authorise Chemring to manufacture Semtex PW4, Chemring used to buy it in bulk from Explosia and manufacture demolition slabs for authorised british and overseas customers before they started their own production of DPX10/PE8. Cheers,--109.192.70.163 (talk) 19:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Bad faith accusations
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Bacondrum (talk) 22:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Please see WP:NPA and WP:NOTFORUM. Dvaderv2, if you post something like that again, I will block you from editing. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:10, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Section (military unit), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AT-4. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for April 7
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Policja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PK.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Your sandboxes
editHi Dvaderv2, you have a few sandboxes with long lists of links and other stuff, and almost 70% of your edits have been to them. How are those sandboxes related to the encyclopedia, and how do you plan to use the content of your sandboxes in your mainspace editing? Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 17:27, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Three weeks later – repeating my questions: how do you plan to use the content of your sandboxes in your mainspace editing? What is the purpose of the sandboxes, and how do they relate to Wikipedia? --bonadea contributions talk 14:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Important Notice
edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Military beret
editYour view would be appreciated here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Military_beret#United_Kingdom Dreddmoto (talk) 02:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 30
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited TVP Info, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TVN.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Dvaderv2, I wanted to let you know that I have mostly reverted your large additions to the synopsis of The War Game. The purpose of the plot section (here called "synopsis") is to give a general overview of the major points in a plot, not a blow-by-blow account of every last thing that happens, nor descriptions, explanations, interpretations, and technical details.
You correctly note that "MOS:FILMPLOT makes an allowance for >700-word summaries if the plot is sufficiently complicated", but this is not such a plot. There are no alternative timelines, different points-of-view, flash-backs, any of the devices that might make a plot complex; as films go this is well towards the simpler end of the spectrum and the previous iteration, at 559 words, is appropriate.
I have retained some of your improving edits; feel free to add anything that would make a material difference to the reader's understanding of the film's general thrust, and of course correct any errors, but please be aware that bloating the section to 700 (let alone 863) words is not appropriate. Best wishes! Captainllama (talk) 16:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
How inline citations work
editAlthough it's never wrong to cite every sentence, when you see:
Here is a sentence. Here is another sentence. (cite)
Usually this means that both sentences are supported by the second citation, if in doubt you can always check it. (t · c) buidhe 06:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)