DimiYarVOSACEO

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meritocratic Pay Equity (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothytyy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meritocratic Pay Equity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Timothytyy (talk) 02:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, DimiYarVOSACEO! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Timothytyy (talk) 02:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Meritocratic Pay Equity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Meritocratic Pay Equity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Timothytyy (talk) 02:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Tomothytyy,

This is an "original thought" article on a subject, which currently lacks from Wikipedia. There are plenty of references to "Meritocratic Pay Equity" that mention my name when you google the term. For example, Council for Inclusive Capitalism mentions Meritocratic Pay Equity here under Dimi Yar's profile: https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/member/dimi-yar/

and also here under the company page:

https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/organization/vosa-income-inequality-solutions/

Meritocratic Pay Equity is also mentioned in this article about Dimi Yar:

https://rcedutalent.com/story-of-mr-dimi-yar-founder-of-vosa-and-share25/

Please let me know what else Wikipedia needs in order to capture the newly coined term and its explanation, and this way add value to society? DimiYarVOSACEO (talk) 02:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Sources 1 and 2: non-independent sources, published by highly subject-affiliated website. Source 3: Only a paragraph out of the whole text. We need SIGCOV. But I agree that I start to see new sources. Hopefully you can find independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage soon! Timothytyy (talk) 01:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Hello, I'm Timothytyy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Meritocratic Pay Equity have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Timothytyy (talk) 02:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Its not promotional. I coined a new term and wanted to make it public with explanation of what it means on Wikipedia. 108.54.165.235 (talk) 03:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

That is not what Wikipedia is for. Rather, if a number of reliable and independent sources wrote a substantial amount about the concept, then, and only then, might a Wikipedia article about it be appropriate. Wikipedia is not the place to "get the word out"; if that's your objective, please consider a more appropriate venue such as a dedicated website for the concept and/or social media. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps Musk was right when he suggested renaming Wikipedia to Dickipedia. I used to rely on Wikipedia as a type of encyclopedia, but if its intended to barely follow what is trending on Tik-Tok, then good luck to all of you as Wikipedia is soon replaced by a mediocre AI bot, which will by the way know what "Meritocratic Pay Equity" is because I have written about it on the dedicated website and on LinkedIn and in presentations on YouTube, Google references me thoroughly, and so do multiple articles.

Best Regards. DimiYarVOSACEO (talk) 16:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

If you can find the "multiple articles" and bring them here (if they meet the requirements of GNG), we are more than welcome to see you create a new article. However, your text on the "dedicated website" and "Linkedln" is non-acceptable as a source on Wikipedia because they are not independent, same as Youtube; see WP:RS for more details. Also, all the sources you provided at the previous section doesn't seem to meet the requirements of GNG (explained above). As you have a COI with the subject matter, I suggest you try to find more third-party sources that detailedly describe the term. Moreover, you should write the article in a more neutral tone; see NPOV. I hope you would understand these issues, make improvements and submit the article again! Timothytyy (talk) 02:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:DimiYarVOSACEO

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:DimiYarVOSACEO requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)