Important Notice edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of war involving Mughal Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shah Shuja. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Amritsar (1797) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Battle of Amritsar (1797), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ts12rActalk to me 08:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Battle of Amritsar (1797) edit

 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Battle of Amritsar (1797) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/stream/HistoryOfTheSikhsVol.IvTheSikhCommonwealthOrRiseAndFallOfSikh/HistoryOfTheSikhsVol.IvTheSikhCommonwealthOrRiseAndFallOfSikhMisls_djvu.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 12:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   — Diannaa (talk) 12:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future — Diannaa (talk) 13:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daredevils56 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I think this is totally my Mistake but I joined Wikipedia a month ago. So I didn't know much about Wikipedia policy that much I am trying my best to not violate the copyright policy but it's happen mistakely please forgive me and give me chance I will make sure this thing didn't happen again I will learn more about Wikipedia policy

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

  • What is copyright?
  • How is Wikipedia licenced?
  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 14:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daredevils56 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I request to Admins to please unblock me check my Answer and if I made some mistake and if I have made a mistake then please tell me what else can I do better

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 13:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you are unable to answer all the questions posed, as currently seems to be the case, please remove your unblock request until you've had a chance to read and thoroughly understand WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. --Yamla (talk) 12:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The questions are above. You know the questions are above. --Yamla (talk) 10:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

1 Question Answer is copyright was the legal right to be the only person who may print copy, perform, etc. a piece of original work, such as a book,

2 Question Answer is Wikipedia text is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA). This allows anyone to reuse the content for any purpose, including commercial use, so long as they follow the license's conditions.

3 Question Answer: We can not use Copyright content because the database servers are located in the United States, Wikipedia is subject to US copyright law in this matter and may not host material which infringes US copyright law

4 Answer We can use Free content which was not copyrighted or with taking the permission of Copyright Holder or giving credit to copyright owner

5 Answer

I will make sure that I do not copy share or alter without seeking permission of Copyright Holder, Always assume that work is Copyrighted. I will use free content in my Edits in future

There are five questions. Please remove your unblock request until you are able to correctly answer all five. Otherwise, you may find your block extended for WP:CIR concerns. --Yamla (talk) 11:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Given that you are still not able to give correct answers and given you were caught violating copyright after you were blocked, while you were attempting to be unblocked, it is very clear that no admin will be unblocking you in the foreseeable future. I will shut down your access to this page now. --Yamla (talk) 12:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Disambiguation link notification for August 31 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars involving the Mughal Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Jalalabad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #64539 edit

noted   Confirmed block evasion. -- Yamla (talk) 10:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Amritsar (1797) edit

  Hello, Daredevils56. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Amritsar (1797), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Amritsar (1797) edit

 

Hello, Daredevils56. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Amritsar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply