Your submission at Articles for creation: Hydrogen Council (April 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
joe deckertalk 23:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Daniel Williams1978! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe deckertalk 23:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello Daniel Williams1978, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Hydrogen Council have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fuel cells edit

Post on the article's Talk page, not on mine. The sources you cited were either misplaced in the article or did not support your assertions. If you break down each assertion on the Talk page, we can talk about each in turn, but I can tell you that any discussion of *future* fuelling stations is a non-starter, as every previous claim about future fueling stations has proved to be vastly overstated. Do not cite fuel cell industry groups, as they have an obvious conflict of interest. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you feel you know more than me, and I'd be happy if you could share. Here is something I just found instantly disproving your point -

Japan wants to have 160 hydrogen stations and 40,000 FCVs on the country’s roads by March 2021. By 2030, it aims to have 900 stations to service some 800,000 FCVs, buses and forklifts.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-hydrogen/japan-venture-aims-to-build-80-hydrogen-fuelling-stations-by-2022-idUSKBN1GH072

They have 100 already and a consortium of 11 companies speeding up the process for the remaining 60. Most of these were built in the last three years.

This article has global figures from February: https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/germany-had-the-highest-increase-of-hydrogen-refuelling-stations-worldwide-in-2017

Daniel Williams1978 (talk) 08:42, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hydrogen Council has been accepted edit

 
Hydrogen Council, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply