Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fantasy Footballers (January 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Crameraj! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fantasy Footballers (January 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 06:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fantasy Footballers (March 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ravenswing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ravenswing 05:43, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

User talk:Ravenswing Thank you for reviewing the article. Could you please recommend some independent sources that podcasts use? Would I be better deleting the non-independent sources and leaving the information unreferenced?

As far as being like an advertisement, I've tried to model the page after other podcast company pages like Feral Audio and Crooked Media. Are there specific areas of the Fantasy Footballer's article that are a problem? Crameraj (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

User talk:Ravenswing I believe I have removed the advertisement information from the article. Could you please re-review? Crameraj (talk) 22:17, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puddle Pull (April 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please see Draft talk:Wilma Z. Davis edit

This is the draft talk page. Comments have been added, which may help you with editing. --Gryllida (talk) 03:27, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fantasy Footballers (May 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 17:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fantasy Footballers (October 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Flat Out (talk) 00:46, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Flat Out, thank you for performing the review. As I mentioned as a comment on the draft page, could you please provide additional feedback since this is a top podcast company in the fantasy football area? Is there another sports podcast you can reference that is an example of an acceptable article? Is there a specific section of the draft article that you feel is not appropriate for Wikipedia? Crameraj (talk) 21:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Crameraj for the subject (the podcast) to be notable someone independent of the podcast needs to have written about it - not just mentioned it. If you can point to 2-3 articles about the podcast then I'll happily take another look. Flat Out (talk) 00:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Flat Out These are the 4 articles which are independent and specifically about the company. Crameraj (talk) 14:31, 1 November 2018 (UTC) Reply
  • Chesler, Josh (1 September 2017). "The Fantasy Footballers Are Here to Help You Win Your League and Humiliate Your Friends". Phoenix New Times. Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  • "Phoenix friends launch wildly successful 'Fantasy Footballers' podcast out of bedroom closet". AZFamily.com. 24 August 2018. Retrieved 12 September 2018.
  • Pazera, Justin (30 August 2017). "Cool! Full-time job for three Phoenix friends is to talk about fantasy football". ABC15. Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  • Hayes, Marcus (19 July 2018). "The Fantasy Footballers Podcast road show comes to Philly, and we share a clip of Dallas fans booing us at their Texas show". The Inquirer. Retrieved 4 September 2018.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Crameraj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Crameraj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fantasy Footballers (March 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NORG.
K.e.coffman (talk) 02:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Fantasy Footballers edit

 

Hello, Crameraj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Fantasy Footballers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 06:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply