CraigWilliamsPDX
|
June 2010 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Beverly Cleary School has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/BeverlyClearyK8School.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:50, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Beverly Cleary School has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Quinxorin (talk) 00:52, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I've removed some of the material from the article on Beverly Cleary School because a lot of the material was cut and pasted from another website and/or document. Wikipedia does not allow republishing content without express permission, and in general, it should not be done anyway. Please read the policy on copyright and Wikipedia here. Thanks! --Esprqii (talk) 22:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- You can't cut and paste text from the PPS website, even if you provide a reference. That's basically plagiarism. Please, please, read Wikipedia's copyright policy before making further edits. Click the "talk" link next to my signature at the end of this line if you'd like to ask me any questions. I really would love to have this article written, but you can't go about it by cutting and pasting from their website. --Esprqii (talk) 00:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Esprqii, thanks for reviewing the entry. I'm confused why you've deleted some entries and left others, since everything has been duly referenced. In fact, some of the stuff you deleted was information that I wrote for the BCS website, which I administer! Most of the PPS info I referenced was written by the principal of the school specifically for the PPS site. So, I'm not sure really why any of that stuff was deleted. The information about the history of the buildings is scarce and very hard to find; after your initial editing I went and reviewed and cleared out 75% of what was there and left in references. If necessary, I can just leave that information as external links at the end, but I would really like it to be in the article. How does one go about getting and showing permission to use such information? Do I just have to let you know if I get permission from PPS to use the facilities information?CraigWilliamsPDX (talk) 14:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- My methodology was not perfect. I removed what I could find that was obviously copied from the BCS website. And I certainly get where you are coming from, that you wrote it and of course it's OK with you to reuse it on Wikipedia. However, you did publish it there, and from Wikipedia's perspective, that makes it copyrighted text and we don't really have any proof that you are not just copying it. There is a process for obtaining permission on the donating copyrighted material page.
- However, I would suggest a different path. First, I suggest you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's 5 pillars if you have not done so already. Then I'd suggest that the way you wrote the text for the BCS webpage is different from how it would be written in an encyclopedia. So, it should be rewritten to have a neutral point of view, and then each statement made in the WP article should have a citation, not only to the BCS website, which is acceptable, but more preferable, to third-party reliable sources, such as newspapers and other media.
- So for example (and to use inelegant language to make the point), the website might say, "BCS has a great science program with six beakers and four Bunsen burners", the encyclopedic article might say, "BCS has been noted for its science program, but due to state funding cuts in 2010, BCS's science program has been reduced from twelve beakers to six chipped ones and four temperamental Bunsen burners." Then you would provide references to both the BCS website and the Oregonian article about budget cuts and how they have affected BCS.
- Hopefully that makes sense. One more thing, I should caution you that there is an ongoing debate within Wikipedia as to whether articles about elementary schools that are not somehow "notable," as defined by Wikipedia, should exist at all. So there is definitely a possibility your article would be deleted, or more likely, merged with the Portland Public Schools article. I have no idea if that will happen, but it's a possibility. There is one discussion about the article going on on the Wikipedia Oregon project discussion page here, and I invite you to weigh in on the discussion. --Esprqii (talk) 17:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- P.S. Go ahead and reply here, I'll watch the page.
- I replied over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Oregon#Beverly_Cleary_School. Please don't give up on the article, it's a great start! --Esprqii (talk) 00:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Beverly Cleary School edit
I have nominated Beverly Cleary School, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverly Cleary School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. tedder (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Unblock? edit
CraigWilliamsPDX (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Not sure why I was blocked, as I never got any notification. There doesn't seem to be a reason shown on my talk page.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- CraigWilliamsPDX (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 97.120.55.189 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Long-term abuse: {{checkuserblock}}; hardening block
Accept reason: The range block has been modified to allow registered users to edit. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- You are caught in a rangeblock, I will ask the Blocking admin to review your case. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
If you are caught in a rangeblock you need to follow the instructions in the message you get when you try to edit. Otherwise there is no way for an administrator to find the relevant autoblock and deal with it. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter ames carlin.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SarahStierch (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for May 30 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Ames Carlin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Arrested Development and Bill O'Reilly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)