January 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm 2600:6C52:6C7F:F549:2CD4:9C1E:4145:3C1A. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Doomsday Clock, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. 2600:6C52:6C7F:F549:2CD4:9C1E:4145:3C1A (talk) 18:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hong Kong Public Organizations moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Hong Kong Public Organizations, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. lovkal (talk) 13:38, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hong Kong Public Organizations

edit

 Template:Hong Kong Public Organizations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hong Kong Public Organizations (April 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Chelseallison! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Office of the Government Chief Information Officer moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Office of the Government Chief Information Officer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 21:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Chelseallison

Thank you for creating Efficiency Office.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Meets notability but needs more references. Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Housing Bureau

edit

Hello, Chelseallison,

Thank you for creating Housing Bureau.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs a few third-party sources that could help with verification

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Chelseallison

Thank you for creating Innovation and Technology Commission.

User:Robertsky, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

redirected. the Commission doesn't seem to be notable. The Commission is already mentioned in the parent organisation's page and doesn't seem to offer more details beyond what's in the parent organisation's page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Robertsky}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– robertsky (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Government Laboratory moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Government Laboratory, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Additional notes: there's more than 100 years of history to this organisation. beyond the boilerplate introduction of organisation with the usage of primary source, I suggest expanding on the history of the organisation, supported by appropriate third party sources. – robertsky (talk) 16:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Hong Kong Public Organizations

edit

  Hello, Chelseallison. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hong Kong Public Organizations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Office of the Government Chief Information Officer

edit

  Hello, Chelseallison. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Office of the Government Chief Information Officer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Office of the Government Chief Information Officer

edit
 

Hello, Chelseallison. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Office of the Government Chief Information Officer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Government Laboratory

edit

  Hello, Chelseallison. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Government Laboratory, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Government Laboratory

edit
 

Hello, Chelseallison. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Government Laboratory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply