Bogusflo3

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 04:25, Friday, June 28, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

February 2014

In a recent edit to the page Michael Forster, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spotted Cow (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spotted Cow.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spotted Cow (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spotted Cow.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Bogusflo3/sandbox (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker^talk 21:59, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleo Logo 500px.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleo Logo 500px.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Otus scops (talk) 00:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem: User:Bogusflo3/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as User:Bogusflo3/sandbox, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from , and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at User talk:Bogusflo3/sandbox and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, User:Bogusflo3/sandbox, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at User talk:Bogusflo3/sandbox with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on User talk:Bogusflo3/sandbox. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at User talk:Bogusflo3/sandbox saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. :) Having looked at the previously deleted version of the article and the source, I think the copyright issues are not a concern with the sandbox content as it appears. I've restored it. I have, however, "comented out" the categories, as we don't display article categories in sandboxes. When you are ready to resubmit, you can restore them by removing the hidden code that looks like this: <!-- >. The categories that are sandwiched between them will then appear. I would suggest, though, that you might want to modify the article a bit before submission. For instance, it currently says, "Cleo is software company that provides secure electronic data interchange (EDI) and integration solutions to businesses with enterprise managed file transfer needs. " I'm afraid the jargon there is extremely heavy - Wikipedia is a general use encyclopedia that is meant to be written at a level where it can be read by people who are reasonably intelligent and educated, but not necessarily familiar with the background of the topics. I'd recommend writing your description of what the company is and does for your grandmother. :) We don't talk down, but we try to speak plainly.

A couple of other tips - I'd recommend reading it very closely for anything that sounds like it could be promotional, even if you don't intend it to be. "Provid[ing] solutions" is corporate positive jargon that implies that their software will fix your problems. While this may be true, it's not neutral. Neither is it neutral to say their products "serve" - a neutral presentation of that information would be "Cleo's products are sold internationally and targeted to...." or something like that.

I'd also encourage you to consider the reliability of sources. rrstar.com looks like a publicly generated website. Their Terms say that they accept user generated content. This looks very like a press release, and press releases are not considered reliable sources for most information on Wikipedia. This one is a blog by an outsider who is evidently employed by the paper, so that one's probably okay. Most of the content in an article - and especially content that sounds like it praises or promotes the company - should be sourced to newspapers, magazines, books, industry websites, etc. that are not connected to the company. This helps us meet our goals for neutrality and verifiability. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bogusflo3. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 15:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Cleo (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cleo.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FireflySixtySeven (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Cleo (company) was accepted

Cleo (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zach Vega (talk to me) 09:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cleo Logo 500px.png

Thanks for uploading File:Cleo Logo 500px.png, which you've attributed to http://www.cleo.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Katie^talk 08:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleo (company) logo, 2014.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleo (company) logo, 2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)