User talk:Bluemask/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bluemask. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Orphaned non-free image (File:All About Love poster.jpg)
You've uploaded File:All About Love poster.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Message
Hi. I left a message for you at Tagalog Wikipedia. Thanks. - AnakngAraw (talk) 05:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Parokya ni edgar-solid.jpg)
You've uploaded File:Parokya ni edgar-solid.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Temptation Island
Just to let you know that the show is now on pre-production. By the way I do work for ABS-CBN. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icomparetv (talk • contribs) 10:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Filipino beauty pageant contestants
Category:Filipino beauty pageant contestants, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 12:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
No
Please do not reform the template as you did to Tem:HoPhilippines, it's always better if each template has a different way of looking. 98.119.177.171 (talk) 06:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Why? The templates are supposed to be consistent.--Bluemask (talk) 06:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- But not all of them. There were also some other templates that were reformed two, such as T:HoAfghanistan or T:HoRussia. You can see that if all templates are the same, it would be hard to distinguish. I think we should only reform the new templates that aren't yet create. And those templates that were already created, just leave it like that. Cheer. 98.119.177.171 (talk) 07:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Why should it be hard to distinguish? All of them, {{History of the Philippines}}, {{History of Russia}}, and {{History of Afghanistan}}, have a distinguishing image (coat of arms for Russia and Afghanistan). I can distinguish all of them from each other.--Bluemask (talk) 07:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're right. Could you do me a favor. The new template has the color of orange on the top, could you change it to blue (like old template). 98.119.177.171 (talk) 08:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- But not all of them. There were also some other templates that were reformed two, such as T:HoAfghanistan or T:HoRussia. You can see that if all templates are the same, it would be hard to distinguish. I think we should only reform the new templates that aren't yet create. And those templates that were already created, just leave it like that. Cheer. 98.119.177.171 (talk) 07:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello
If you are so adamant on sources, you could have looked them up and added them yourself. And I've been contributing to Wikipedia since 2003 under different names, so spare me the false welcomes. --Shikata Ganai (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Why the sarcasm? As of the moment, no politician announced running as president for the Philippine general election, 2010, unless you can prove by reliable sources otherwise. --Bluemask (talk) 01:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Edit on Imphal Bombing Page
That website source is not trustable. See for yourself. Amresh2k (talk) 06:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know what you are referring to. I am just completing the citation templates in that article. If you are disputing the references given in that article, place a {{rs}} beside that reference and discuss it on that article's talk page or to the user who originally placed that reference. --bluemask (talk) 06:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. my bad. Amresh2k (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 11:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC).
tungko
sayo ba ang tungko highway na inupload ko dito?--Ramz Trinidad (talk) 06:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hindi. Pero ang tanong, sa iyo ba? Kung oo, paki-upload po ang high resolution version para mas maganda at wala nang tanong-tanong sa copyright nito. --Bluemask (talk) 07:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
hindi skin un, nkha ko lng s skyscraperscity, pag ngrestday ako sa work punta ko tungko, pra picturan, malapit lng ako don eh. tga sapang palay lang ako —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramz Trinidad (talk • contribs) 12:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Mas OK kung makakuha ka! Next time, huwag mong gamitin ang {{PD-self}} kung hindi ikaw ang kumuha ng picture, OK? --Bluemask (talk) 13:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
salamat sa payo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramz Trinidad (talk • contribs) 14:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Ang Dating Daan related topics
Since I saw you edit this article for the better, I am appealing that you help again in fixing the Eli Soriano article and the Members Church of God International be fixed somehow. Many user's keeps adding the so called "cult calling" to the beginning of the article although it is already placed in the section of critisims. Also, the references they are trying to show was already deemed unbiased (also violating WP:RS). Another user told me to remove all those references (see here), but after a few weeks, returned them and kept reverting most of my edits. Please help, there is obviously a COI there. Hope you can help. Dar book (Complains?) 11:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
CSD
Hi Bluemask, hope you don't mind but I've declined the deletion requests for Teresita S. Lazaro and Amado Espino, Jr. as in my view they meet our criteria for inclusion per wp:POLITICIAN, specifically " People who have held international, national or first-level sub-national political office, including members of a legislature and judges." ϢereSpielChequers 08:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Wolfgang withfrancis.jpg
Hi! I have since forwarded an email from the band's management granting permission to release the image under GFDL to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Below is an excerpt from the email message:
- From: lizza g nakpil <nakpil@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Wolfgang image
- To: "Kurt M. Guirnela" <kguirnela@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 10:29 AM
- Hi Kurt
- Thank you once again.
- As the representative of Semenelin Music (Wolfgang's own independent music label) and manager of Wolfgang, I agree to the terms of use of the GNU Free Documentation License for the photos provided to you.
Does this suffice? Cheers! — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 01:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- I already tagged the image with {{OTRS pending}}. Did you include the location of the image (File:Wolfgang withfrancis.jpg) when you forwarded the email to permissions-en? --Bluemask (talk) 08:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I may have missed that, but I did include the filename. Thanks for the assist. Cheers! — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 04:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Update: Permissions emailed back with this ticket number: 2009040110010187. What should be done next? Cheers! — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 13:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- OK! The file description is now updated with the ORTRS number. Thanks. --Bluemask (talk) 04:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the assist Blue. Cheers! — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 06:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- OK! The file description is now updated with the ORTRS number. Thanks. --Bluemask (talk) 04:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Mga Kantang Galing Sa Loob ng Kwarto Ko cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mga Kantang Galing Sa Loob ng Kwarto Ko cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Restored. --Bluemask (talk) 07:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
beta kappa frtaernity
blue mask.. ano bang dapat gawin ko para maipost yung beta kappa fraternity... the truth e newbie pa lng ako... help naman in posting the beta kappa fraternity.. tnx...god bless —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssor cram (talk • contribs) 04:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- It needs to be notable, as in known by the majority, before it can be included here. If it was involved in any major events, or if someone from your fraternity had earned a very significant and deserving reputation, or is a notable person (i.e. an actor or politician), then it deserves to stay. But for now, it doesn't meet that qualification. Think about it: Hindi ibabalita sa TV yung mga katiting na bagay lang maliban sa police report. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Barangay Hilabago
I think the Wikipedia should allow information (articles) on governmental units to enable researchers on political systems understood the concept of political subdivisions of countries. The Philippines being a unitary state, needs more information on the Wikipedia as much as possible and other Wikis because these informations are not available in published encyclopedias.
As Wikipedia contributor, I myself believe that info like this should be enriched rather than tagged for deletion. Who knows? There might be some people interested on particular local government units. Barangay is the basic unit of government in the Philippines. No cities and towns will exist without it - that is how important it is!
Barangay Hilabago is one important, albeit a small LGU, that needs to exist on the Wikipedia not only because of its historical importance during World War II but its significance as a basic unit of government. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marletbadeo (talk • contribs) 05:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- The article must establish notability that can be verified by reliable sources like newspaper articles. --Bluemask (talk) 06:17, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
I think, there should no need for referencing about this Barangay because I was born and raised here, so i'm pretty familiar with it. I hope to see in print some article about this place in the future, especially its historical importance and role during the second World War when Japanese soldiers camped out here and as they were pursued by advancing American forces.
bedcrawl (talk) 08:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, one of Wikipedia's core policies is verifiability, meaning the information must be and can be verified by others, so, referencing is required. The existence of the barangay is of course can be verified with DILG or at the statistics office but other information such as history must first be published by someone else so that others can verify the information. Unverifiable content will be removed. --Bluemask (talk) 09:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Zaira Cosico.jpg
Hi BM, I uploaded a newer version, which I took, this should solve license issues, it's not as nice as the professional taken picture, but I couldn't get hold of a release from the photographer. Please recheck now. --TitanOne (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Which version is the one you took? The first uploaded version is still active. --Bluemask (talk) 14:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- The second one, Zai posing from the hotel window, the full body one. I took it using a Sony (point & shoot) DSC W-110 camera. Would you have rights to delete the first 2 photos? Those lack release permissions from the photographer. --TitanOne (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- I suggest that you upload your photo with a different file name. Upload the unedited highest resolution so that the meta data (EXIF) will show up. Also state who the photographer is (which is you) and when you took it. The old file will be deleted in a few days since you restored the questionable image. --Bluemask (talk) 14:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- The second one, Zai posing from the hotel window, the full body one. I took it using a Sony (point & shoot) DSC W-110 camera. Would you have rights to delete the first 2 photos? Those lack release permissions from the photographer. --TitanOne (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Sabularse
Hello Bluemask, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Sabularse - a page you tagged - because: does not fall under CSD A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Masisit
i cud see that you edited my article entitled Masisit. Well it's kinda frustrating because it's my first article and im still building it up. im new in this wiki-contributing thing so im not familiar with the rules. however, one thing i know is that posting disinformation is a "no no".
i personally was born raised and am still living in Masisit. i had personal accounts and encounters of the things i wrote in there.
as i said i hardly know the rules. u say it must be verifiable. question:who does the verification? i undrstand you are after the integrity and accuracy of the things written. but i rily wud lyk to be enlightened on this thing.
Thanks man!-D seventh man —Preceding unsigned comment added by D seventh man (talk • contribs) 14:19, July 9, 2009
- You may want to read the discussion about Barangay Hilabago above. --Bluemask (talk) 07:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thanks Bluemask. what im getting is that i cant author articles. what i, as a contributor could just do is to cite writings of other authors, that correct?. i really wanna write this article. and im planning to write more. so what specific actions do you suggest me to do to meet those policies? - D seventh man —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.84.162.233 (talk) 10:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Removed speedy deletion tag: Michaela Espinosa
Hi Bluemask! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Michaela Espinosa- because: the article makes a credible claim of importance or significance. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. decltype (talk) 23:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Tagalog
Please sorry. No problem. Thanks for the information. Chosquitas (talk) 01:21, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
WikiPilipinas is under GFDL (scroll to the very bottom [1]), but they copied from Quezon's own site. So I deleted all problematic sentences and the Wikipedia article's currently a stub. Uthanc (talk) 08:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- replied at the talk page. --Bluemask (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Removal of PROD from Likhaan
Hello Bluemask, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Likhaan has been removed. It was removed by ThaddeusB with the following edit summary '(contest prod - appears to be a notable organization with sufficient reliable source coverage to warrant inclusion (see: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Likhaan%22+health&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=us&hl=en) - will claeaniup & source article ASAP)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with ThaddeusB before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Speedy deletion declined: Sabularse
Hello Bluemask, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Sabularse - a page you tagged - because: G4 can only be applied if the page was previously deleted as result of a a deletion discussion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. SoWhy 10:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Elevated to AFD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabularse. --Bluemask (talk) 15:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Re:Thanks
You're welcome... Just doing my job. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
DXBR-FM, which you tagged as a hoax on April 1, 2009, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the debate, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXBR-FM. Best, Cunard (talk) 08:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Incorrect copyright clearance at Crispulo Aguinaldo
Hello,
I noticed you cleared the above article on the grounds that the source is GFDL 1.2. Unfortunately, since transitioning to dual licensing on June 16th, GFDL-only content is no longer permissible on Wikipedia, see WP:Licensing update#Content restrictions. Best, MLauba (talk) 11:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- I also came across with a similar case while working on article Domingo Abella. I marked the article with {{db-copyvio}} but User:Nihonjoe cleared the article. See my discussion with Nihinjoe here. That is why I am slapping those articles with {{GFDLSource}} just in case. Now I know what to do on this cases. Thanks. --Bluemask (talk) 15:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Just in case, if you were ever in doubt on such issues, you could of course also either tag it with the {{copyvio}} template, or raise a question at either WT:CP or WT:COPYCLEAN. And BTW, thanks for adding the {{GFDLSource}}, which did save me the research :) Cheers, MLauba (talk) 15:54, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Help Required
I need your help regarding uploading a picture on wikipedia. It is uploaded on flickr.com by some user and the image clearly states it to be in the status of 'all rights reserved'. Although, it is imperative that I upload it on wikipedia as it is of some individual whose article is already existing here on wiki. Kindly guide me, what sould I do? (((Create my talk page)))Tv-med (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, it would be very helpful if I know what the address (URL) of the flickr image you are referring and on what article you are planning to place it. Since the flickr page stated that it is under "all right reserved", we need to contact the original photographer if he (or she) would want to relicense the image under a free license. Hope that helps. --Bluemask (talk) 09:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Reply
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Request for help, please
Dear Bluemask, nice to meet you! I wonder if you would be so kind to help translate a very short-stub version of 3-4 sentences of this article for the Ilokano Wikipedia? Thank you very much for any advice or help you could offer. I hope to hear from you. Sincerely--Brezza del mare (talk) 10:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
To ensure that the article passes the Wiki standards, I have rewritten the beginning paragraph and placed appropriate citations accordingly. In addition, I also added a stub signage at the bottom. Please tell me if those are enough to delete the alert sign placed at the topmost part (of the article).
File:Santino MBP.JPG
hello sir! I've wrote everything needed for this image to use in the article May Bukas Pa ONLY!, but I didn't post this image in the article Zaijan Jaranilla because, I don't think it is needed to post this image in that article. User:Madapaka is the one who post it in the other article without putting the right rationale thing and not me. Check the Zaijan Jaranilla article history and you will see that User:Madapaka is the one who put the image without putting the right rationale. Please reply as soon as you can. Thank you!--White paladin888 (talk) 11:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you sir for removing that image in the article. Thank you also for removing the deletion tag in the image.--White paladin888 (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Tagalog Wikipedia Adminship
Hi. I invite you to visit the admin nomination page of TL Wiki: Nomination here Estudyante (talk) 05:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Image issues with File:Pinoy Big Brother House Floor Plan.png
Hi BM, can you check this image out? I think it violates GDFL per external sources. --TitanOne (talk) 16:43, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- It seems like it is already deleted. --Bluemask (talk) 03:00, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
I need assistance in providing other sources for this article. Will appreciate any immediate help so that it would really be good for DYK nom here. Thanks in advance. - AnakngAraw (talk) 04:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Pinoy Greyhat
i see your point i will revise my article then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knytmare (talk • contribs) 07:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: Anon IP declining PROD tags
I followed the anon IP who declined all the PROD tags because it did a re-direct to one of the bands. I have CSD'ed all but one that claims it had awards. I also warned the anon IP because it is either connected to or created the articles IMHO. ----moreno oso (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Removal of PROD from Timothy Chan
Hello Bluemask, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Timothy Chan has been removed. It was removed by Mo ainm with the following edit summary '(remove prod didn't know that being unsourced was a reason to delete. I make no judgemwnt on if this article should stay perhaps AfD is the best option.)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Mo ainm before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 08:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- I explained things to the user about BLP PROD, which they must have missed knowing about. DGG ( talk ) 20:22, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Proposal at WikiProject Star Trek
Hi Bluemask, I have made a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek#Proposal and thought you might be interested. Thanks, --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 18:42, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
BLP PROD
For people who appear to be well known, such as Sunshine Cruz it is not really helpful to add a BLP prod tag unless you try and do not succeed in finding sources. The admins like me will try to check before deletion, and, as I did, add a few key refs to start out with, but is much more useful to add them yourself, at least if they can be found easily in G or G News -- and then explain to the ed. what he should have done. This is especially true in an area where you are likely to know about the subject--at least more likely than people like me, who know nothing about them except from the articles they work on in Wikipedia, DGG ( talk ) 20:22, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Chris Tiu.jpg
No problems; I declined the speedy simply because you didn't provide a link, and it wasn't obvious without a link that it was a copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 04:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
BLP
Hi! I am inviting you to join the discussions here. Here is the link.. Trust me, it's notable (talk) 08:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Redirects
Hi, I would just like to ask if it is possible to propose a redirected page for deletion?
- time-stamping for archival. --Bluemask (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Re: Truong Sa, Khanh Hoa
The Vietnamese article is about the administration of the Spratly Islands within Vietnam, so its content is not much different from the article about the Spratly Islands. DHN (talk) 08:14, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Makoa Kali
An article that you have been involved in editing, Makoa Kali, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makoa Kali. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. jmcw (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism warning
I've struck out your warning of User:Qatariwarrior and replaced it with a level-4 warning. The edit in question came not 10 minutes after the user received a level-3 warning, so I think a level 2 is inadequate under the circumstances. -Rrius (talk) 06:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
WP Star Trek in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Star Trek for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and remember to sign your name. Feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 07:47, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ph seal la union bangar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal la union bangar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- restored use of file on article. --Bluemask (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
New Editors..we must show our support. :)
Looks like there is a new batch of active Tagalog Wikipedia editors. Tinatanong na ng isa kung nasaan na ang mga tagapangasiwa sa YL Wiki...eto po ung link: [2]. Sana wag sila mawalan ng interest sa pagtulong sa wiki...ipakita natin ang ating suporta. Estudyante (talk) 08:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia Philippine Chapter in Philippine Youth Congress
I am glad to announce to you that we will be debuting as an organization at the Philippine Youth Congress in Information Technology on September 14 to 17, 2010 at the University of the Philippines, Diliman. Jojit will be Wikimedia Philippines resource speaker at the second day of the conference at the UP Film Center. He will be speaking about Wikipedia and how it revolutionizes the World Wide Web. That will be at 9:00 to 10:00 am. We will also set up a booth at the UP Bahay ng Alumni and we will showcase our existing and future projects. We encourage you to participate in our first major project. We have prepared food and refreshments for you. Please let us know so that we can enlist you to our delegation.--Exec8 (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Fretzie Joans R. Bercede
Twinkle puked and didn't complete the AFD. Fixed for you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Archiving at Tagalog Wikipedia
Hello! I wonder why Maskbot is not archiving Kapihan's talk page. I found that Maskbot is configured to archive threads that are older than 35 days.--— JL 09 talk (site)contribs 13:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- And the oldest thread is dated January 2010.--— JL 09 talk (site)contribs 13:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Just kidding, but even you're from Philippines, rather than trying to add sources to article, you tag it for speedy deletion :) --Saqib Qayyum (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: Sarah Ash Sablay Geronimo
Hello Bluemask. I am just letting you know that I deleted Sarah Ash Sablay Geronimo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. SoWhy 11:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.
For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:24, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
File:PNB-logo.gif
Hi I just restored this image, please supply licensing ASAP.--Lenticel (talk) 01:13, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Licensing added. Thanks for the undelete. --Bluemask (talk) 09:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Query about Municipality of Burabod
Although there does not appear to be a Nueva Camarines province yet, this is something which appears to be in the process of discussions:
www
New Camarines Province Bid Gains Traction
April 28, 2011 - 2:06pm | By Noriel Oya
Naga City, (April 28 2011) – The creation of the 4th legislative district of Camarines Sur as a new province redounds to the benefit of the constituents of the district, but the national government, now taking on a crippling budget deficit, may not have the capability nor the willingness to support the clamor.
and...
www
House Hearing on Camarines Sur Partition Started
Article | June 9, 2011 - 2:32am | By Noriel Oya
Personalities in the CAMSUR partition debate: Gov. LRay Villafuerte, Congressman Noli Fuentebella and Congressman Sal Fortuno Naga City (June 8, 2011) - The Congressional Committee on Local Government, chaired by Congresssman George Arnaiz has started hearing and will continue deliberating this week a proposed bill to partition Camarines Sur by creating a new province, Nueva Camarines, out of 17 towns in the Partido and Rinconada districts.
The Province does not yet exist, but I feel that the article was created in good faith, albeit wrong! As such, I am not going to delete it as a hoax, or as vandalism - I will delete it as a test page, and leave a message for the creator!
Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: Municipality of Burabod
Hello Bluemask. I am just letting you know that I deleted Municipality of Burabod, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I was considering deleting this article based on your speedy nomination but realized that you have not added a notice to the creator's talk page. Were you intending to do this? Thanks Fæ (talk) 09:11, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I forgot to add the notice. I placed one now. --Bluemask (talk) 09:17, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
For your information
Supershow (TV Show), take a look. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 12:36, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Message on tl.wiki
Dear Bluemask, I left you a message on your tl.wiki talk page. ;) Kind regards, Mathonius (talk) 09:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:University of Baguio logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:University of Baguio logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- This image was replaced by a PNG version. File:UB SEAL.png --Bluemask (talk) 08:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Undelete request at WP:PINOY
- Done kindly provide the image fair use and copy info ASAP. Thanks.--Lenticel (talk) 07:44, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Declined BLPPROD: Arfeen Khan
I had to decline the BLPPROD here. While there is an on-going RfC on this point, consensus is and appears to be that even a sources of dubious reliability such as IMDB are "enough" to prevent placing a BLPPROD tag, this is explained in more detail at WP:BLPPROD#Nominating. The article may be (after a search for sources as per WP:BEFORE) eligible for PROD or AfD instead. Sorry for the inconvenience. --joe deckertalk to me 15:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- The only problem on the article was that the IMDB article is not related to the subject. --Bluemask (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Well howdy that was stupid of me. I've reverted. My apologies. --joe deckertalk to me 02:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've declined the BLP PROD; the IMDb link provides information on the film in which the subject appeared and clearly lists the subject among the cast members. See http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4201475/ for more information. The current deletion policy requires no sources, links, or references of any kind in order to place a BLP PROD. In this case, I recommend AFD. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 03:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's the same guy, you're right. I think it's time to head to bed. *shakes head at self* --joe deckertalk to me 03:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've declined the BLP PROD; the IMDb link provides information on the film in which the subject appeared and clearly lists the subject among the cast members. See http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4201475/ for more information. The current deletion policy requires no sources, links, or references of any kind in order to place a BLP PROD. In this case, I recommend AFD. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 03:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Well howdy that was stupid of me. I've reverted. My apologies. --joe deckertalk to me 02:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)