Beautydepot

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Male to Female Transition (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spicy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Male to Female Transition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Male to Female Transition, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 03:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Beautydepot! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spicy (talk) 03:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Sex reassignment surgery

I have undone all, or almost all of your recent additions to Sex reassignment surgery, for the reasons detailed in the individual edit summaries at that article. In brief, your additions were irrelevant to the topic of the article, but more seriously, the content you added was not supported by the citations you added; see Wikipedia's policy on WP:Verifiability. Mathglot (talk) 01:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Possible REFSPAM and/or COI

All of your edits appear to be related to adding content about body and facial treatments, cosmetic or reconstructive surgery, and/or products for treating any of the above, and only peripherally about improving the individual articles. I've already reverted your additions to Sex reassignment surgery for the reasons given above. If you have a personal, professional, or other connection to any of these topics, here is some information you should know about; please read it, follow the links, and pay heed to the guidance given:

Hello, Beautydepot. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

---

If you have a professional relationship to cosmetic surgery, or skin and body treatments or products? If so, please WP:DISCLOSE them here, or stop editing such articles, and move on to some other topic area with which you have no connection. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Re: Sex Reassignment surgery, etc

Copy of discussion originally at User talk:Mathglot#Re: Sex Reassignment surgery, etc.

hi! I'm a bit surprised that you decided to take my edits down because I thought I researched that topic in depth and really contributed and expanded the section as I believe it was lacking in important details. I'm also not sure about the citations that you thought were irrelevant as I really put effort into finding scientific peer reviewed articles on the topic - I would appreciate your input and advice on that. Cosmetic interventions are my passion as I have done quite a lot of them myself and hence my interest in them and desire to contribute to either lack of information, incomplete information or erroneous information. I will much appreciate your feedback/response on the items above. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beautydepot (talk • contribs) 02:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Moved from User talk:Mathglot § Re: Sex Reassignment surgery, etc

Hello again, Beautydepot.

I've moved the discussion here from my Talk page, so you'll see my response, and be able to refer to it later if you wish to; it will eventually get archived on my Talk page and will become hard to locate. Regarding your comment about removing the edits at Sex reassignment surgery, each of the removals has its own edit summary accompanying it, that goes into some detail about why it was removed, so you can find those at the History tab on the article. But as I indicated in the section above, your additions were mostly irrelevant to the topic of the article, and may have been more appropriate to an article about dermatology, cosmetic surgery but more seriously, the content you added was not supported by the citations you added. Or to be more specific: your citations *did indeed* support your claims about, say, Sculptra, but then they were preceded by some connective language asserting a connection to trans issues or SRS that was *not* included in the source, but was merely your own assertion about it. That would be kind of analogous to my being enthused about, say, hip surgery, and finding legitimate scientific articles about hip surgery, and then adding to the article: "Some trans individuals end up getting hip surgery, and when they do, here are the fifteen most important things about hip surgery", followed by a long section including fifteen things, and a bunch of accurate citations about hip surgery.

The problem here is threefold: one, as true as my additional content about hip surgery may be, and as accurate as the citations may be, this article is about the topic of SRS, not hip surgery; two, the amount of content would be disproportionate to the amount of material about other subtopics of the main topic title; and three, even if my scientific assertions about hip surgery are accurate, the part before the comma, i.e., the part where it says, "some transgender individuals get hip surgery," while possibly true, has no demonstrated connection with SRS, but more crucially, is not in any of my fifteen citations. Your additions were sort of like that. Your edit of 02:41, May 23, 2021, added a lot of material about the cost of botox, and irrelevant material about where to place botox injections, like in between the eyebrows, and so on. I could go on, but this should give you an idea. If you have more specific questions, ask below and ping me (like this: {{ping|Mathglot}}) and I'll do my best to answer them.

Your comment that

Cosmetic interventions are my passion as I have done quite a lot of them myself...

is related to my comment about COI in the section above; please read it and ask any questions you have about it, in that section, pinging me in the same way. Mathglot (talk) 03:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Male to Female Transition

Hello, Beautydepot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Male to Female Transition, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)