Welcome!

Hello Atacama, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  HGB 07:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Spanish

edit

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Sebastian Kessel Talk 03:06, 4 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hi Atacama, from me as well--I hope you're having a good time with Wikipedia so far. I noticed you just created an article at Manolo Cárdona that doesn't seem to go anywhere--just a red link. I wanted to check with you before deleting it; what are you planning to put up?

Happy editing! --Dvyost 07:05, 7 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

was trying to fix the spelling of Cardonas to include the accent on the a

I've gone ahead and changed the article to a substub based on the Gitanas article for now--if you know more about it and can expand it though, go for it! Just remember to always mention your sources (WP:CITE). Good luck, and happy editing! If you have any questions, just leave a note on my talk page. Best --Dvyost 07:13, 7 November 2005 (UTC)Reply


Help!

edit

How do i change the title to the Fourth & Town article, it is actually spelled, 'Forth and Town.

Normally you'd click on the "move" button up there--but in this case, the proper spelling, "Forth & Towne," already has an article. What I've done instead is merge your information there and make a redirect. It's very important that you check the spelling before you put up the article next time! Just go to Google and make sure you have it right. Good luck! --Dvyost 21:50, 10 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

my personal article

edit

how do i get someone to write it for me. cuz if i do its kinda bias

Just write it yourself. You don't have to be worried about that on your user page. Pretty much the only things discouraged on your user page are attacks on other users and copyright violations. Your user page starts with "User:", ths means it is in the user namespace. Proper encyclopedia articles are in the main namespace and do not have a prefix. Some other namespaces are "Wikipedia:" for things about the project like policy, and "Template:" for templates.
By the way, if you post to this page, only users who have it watched will see it. If you want a faster answer, you should ask at the help desk like you did earlier. --GraemeL (talk) 02:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yerba mate

edit

Why do you think yerba máte is the right spelling? In Spanish, the accent is both wrong and unnecessary, as is a palabra grave that ends in 'e'. In Portuguese is mate. In English, it is either mate or maté (see article for details). In French is maté. And FWIW in Guaraní/Avañe'ẽ it's Caä. Let me know, otherwise I'll revert. Regards, User:Ejrrjs says What? 01:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

im from chile and there its máte MAHteh not maté m'ahTEH

En Chile, como en el resto de Latinoamérica, valen las mismas reglas gramaticales para el español. Saludos, User:Ejrrjs says What? 01:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC) oye güey, todas las marcas de máte, p.ej. Taragüí y Ñandú lo escriben así.Reply

Ñandú...I don't know it.
This is the official website of "Establecimiento Las Marías", producers of Taragüí...they spell it 'mate'
A google search on "yerba mate" site:.cl gives back Chilean sites with the same spelling
My guess is that it might be a spelling mistake on the importer label, if you've seen it in a package bought in the States.
Saludos cordiales, User:Ejrrjs says What? 10:24, 22 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

disambiguation page

edit

how do i create a disambiguation page, for example i want to create one for Ñandú to diferenciate between Ñandú (birds also known as rheas) and Ñandú (the brand of mate) Atacama 11:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

my user page

edit

i want someone to write my page about me, for me. i DO NOT want to do it myself. Is there anyway to make this happen? Atacama 11:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't believe there is a formal place to ask for that. And most users don't edit someone else's userpage. Plus it would be difficult for someone who doesn't know you to write about you. - Akamad 20:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi - Linking to articles in different language wikipedias, like Spanish, is done with Wikipedia:Interlanguage links. These are typically added at the end of the article (like categories). The one you asked about would look like [[es:Dramaturgo (profesión)]]. -- Rick Block (talk) 16:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Request for edit summary

edit

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 7% for major edits and 72% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 46 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 06:30, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Gardenpeachtomatos.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

This.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:58, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Seamless integration

edit
 

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Seamless integration, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Folk Tales from Chile

edit
 

The article Folk Tales from Chile has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:BK Please add reliable 3rd party sources to prove otherwise.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tim1357 (talk) 20:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Atacama! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 874 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Brenda Hughes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Brenda Hughes

edit
 

The article Brenda Hughes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not assert notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EchetusXe 12:34, 25 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of St. David School (Richmond, California) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. David School (Richmond, California) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. David School (Richmond, California) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 01:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

st. david

edit

St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment.LuciferWildCat (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Taragüí for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taragüí is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taragüí until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Narcosatánicos Asesinos for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Narcosatánicos Asesinos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narcosatánicos Asesinos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 00:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bayfair Center

edit
 

The article Bayfair Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Google Books and News do not suggest this is a notable shopping mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 02:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bayfair Center for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bayfair Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayfair Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 18:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply