Ashishtiwari1208

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Ashishtiwari1208/Raj Bisaria has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Raj Bisaria, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 13:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Ashishtiwari1208, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 19:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Raj Bisaria.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 02:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Raj Bisaria.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zach Vega (talk to me) 14:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Raj Bisaria.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! EricEnfermero ^Howdy! 00:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raj Bisaria

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ashish Tiwari (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

I have deleted the peacock phrases.Please have a look.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Raj Bisaria.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 19:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

AfC Submission May 2013

Please insert a template before submitting this article. I will not accept your article until it has a template. Citrusbowler (talk) 20:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Raj Bisaria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Shii (tock) 01:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Raj Bisaria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Candida, Garbo, Fry, Shaw, Loot, Orton, Dumb Waiter, The Pioneer, In Camera, Anthony Shaffer and Abelard and Heloise

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Theatre Arts Workshop logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Theatre Arts Workshop logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theatre Arts Workshop (TAW), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Candida, Garbo and Sleuth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ashishtiwari1208. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Theatre Arts Workshop, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
• instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Last but not least: All contributors must not contribute content that violates conflict of interest laws (just as all contributors must respect copyright). The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive is valid throughout the European Union. In a German court decision in 2012 (that also relied on the directive) regarding Wikipedia: "The court held that when a company edits a Wikipedia article, the resulting text falsely creates the impression that the edit has no business-related purpose. By implication, the judges found that the average reader of Wikipedia articles expects to find objective and neutral information." That is a very very important condition, comparable to the FTC Guide" that consumers are likely to believe reflects the opinions, beliefs, findings, or experience of a party other than the sponsoring advertiser”. This expectation by consumers of neutral information on Wikipedia, requires that companies not write "their" WP articles for PR/marketing purposes.

Editors who are compensated for their contributions should make the disclosure by placing the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template at the top of the talk page of affected articles and filling in the parameters. They should also supply this information as part of a list on their user page of all their paid contributions.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 17:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Theatre Arts Workshop logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theatre Arts Workshop logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You said somebody named Ritasinha had edited this article on 27th October 2015 and afterwards you have deleted the article (page) on 28th October 2015. So I don't know about the changes had been made by this ambiguous person Ritasinha tagged the page to be speedy deleted as advertising or promotion. I deleted your article because

• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of promotional or biased claims presented as fact include: the stunning growth of theatre in India... inexplicably removed... A pioneer of the modern theatre movement in North India, Raj Bisaria is a highly revered stage director. He has a thorough grounding in the western classics and contemporary dramatic works.[14] His productions are remarkable for their brilliant artistry and contemporary relevance...—and so on. It's a hagiography. Note that the fact that you have a source for someone saying these things doesn't make them facts. You can say "Diwan Singh Bajeli said...", but that is an opinion, not a fact.
• Theatre Arts Workshop is bolded for promotional emphasis
• It's highly selective, full of glowing praise, with no criticism of him, but plenty for those who failed to support him, eg heavy odds.... He has carried on in spite of everything is a measure of his determination to do well... But carping critics say... Not one of them is willing to lend a helping hand to TAW. Each of them is keen on finding fault with its selection of... They advised Raj Bisaria to come down a little. It simply did not occur to them that what they fail to understand was all there on the stage, in the lighting, the atmosphere, the dramatic situation...—that's an astonishingly biased rant, in contrast to the praise lavished on A hard
• the article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. Much of the text seems to copied directly from the sources, for example the section beginning A pioneer of the modern theatre movement in North India, Raj Bisaria is a highly revered stage director... is taken verbatim from its source, which is clearly marked Copyright© 2015, The Hindu
• because it's been an important source and huge help for lots of people to know about Raj Bisaria through wikipedia.— but it's not our job to help promote him (and you said he doesn't need the promotion anyway.

You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all.

If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. We often restore deleted text to a user sub page for improvement, but I cannot restore copyrighted text for legal reasons Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

More

Because you have an obvious conflict of interest, please note that paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ashishtiwari1208. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ashishtiwari1208|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}.

Having done that, I strongly suggest that you write the article as a draft as suggested above.

And some of the examples that you have given about the advertisement hasn't been written by me.''—nothing personal, if it's inappropriate it doesn't matter who wrote it

And about the copyright, The Hindu is a national newspaper, but now I would delete everything related to that — the Hindu is fine as a source, but you must summarise what it says, not copy or closely paraphrase

I need you to to follow the declaration of advocacy as I have indicated before we go any further with this Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Block

I have indefinitely blocked you for denying (on my user page)a COI in violation of our terms and conditions as described above. this and this make it clear that you direct productions and are the main contact for the company, not just a "student". You may appeal this block by adding the text tlx{{|unblock|I declare that, I know Raj Bisaria and Theatre Arts Workshop. Theatre Arts Workshop is a non for profit, cultural organisation (NGO). The production I directed was a student production, not a professional production, and I also declare that I do not hold any post there, and I do not earn any kind of money. So how can I say that I am an employee of any person or organisation, and if I am not being paid, it would be incorrect to say that I am an employee. So please unblock me.Ashish Tiwari (talk) 09:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

If you wish to leave me a message, you can still edit this page, and I will see your your response Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

{{|unblock|I declare that, I know Raj Bisaria and Theatre Arts Workshop. Theatre Arts Workshop is a non for profit, cultural organisation. The production I directed was a student production, not a professional production, and I also declare that I do not hold any post there, and I do not earn any kind of money. So how can I say that I am an employee of any person or organisation, and if I am not being paid, it would be incorrect to say that I am an employee. So please unblock me.Ashish Tiwari (talk) 09:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)}}122.163.249.210 (talk) 08:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC) Ashish Tiwari (talk) 09:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your original claim to be just a student was less transparent than it might have been, but I'll assume good faith and unblock you shortly. All the other problems remain, and in view of your obvious conflict of interest, even if you are indeed unpaid, I strongly suggest that you do not recreate these articles. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ashishtiwari1208. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)