Tomb Raider edit

I've reverted a number of, not all, of your recent edits to various Tomb Raider articles. A lot of what you added was unsourced, speculative and opinions. Please read up on the wiki policies regarding ensuring citations are required. Thanks. MrMarmite (talk) 09:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Yeah you will notice that Wikipedia does not accept content based on your personal opinions. This isn't Wikia or a blog. Thank you. —Mike Allen 10:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • Once again you have made multiple edits to TR articles which have been reverted. Please try to familiarise yourself with what makes an encyclopaedic entry and what appears to be opinions and blog-style comments. Thanks. MrMarmite (talk) 04:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Clover Studio appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2000–09 in fashion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hot Pants (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2000–09 in fashion may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 9 April edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 24 April edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1970s in fashion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Osama57, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 10:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2000–09 in fashion may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:23, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reversion edit

Hello! From your edit summary here, I'm unsure if you noticed that the edit also deleted an image file, added another image file with broken coding, changed the section on men's hair styles (I don't recall spiky hair being popular outside of the junior high school set...), etc. You may wish to review and repair these other changes along with the date issue you mentioned in your edit summary. Thanks! Ashanda (talk) 07:50, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1970s in fashion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardigan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Concerns re 1970s in fashion edit

Hi, your edits to 1970s in fashion cause some concern on my part. The page does need a LOT of work, but I noticed that you are depending very heavily on the Retrowaste website which appears to be self published by a dealer (for promotional/advertising purposes), relying on their independent opinions, and does not show evidence of being published with third party editorial supervision. This means it is NOT a reliable source and not appropriate to use as a reference, especially to the extent seen here. I am just saying this as a heads-up. The page really does need work, and I'm glad you want to improve it, but revisions and additions need to be supported by much more rock solid sources than Retrowaste. Mabalu (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 7 July edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1970s in fashion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cut off. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Say You'll Be There may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of High-waisted trousers for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High-waisted trousers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High-waisted trousers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wayne Jayes (talk) 21:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Photo of Acting Strange edit

As requested, see 2000–09 in fashion#Men.

Disambiguation link notification for September 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2000s in fashion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 16 September edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 17 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1990s in fashion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orange and Tie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 18 September edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:45, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

What are you playing at? edit

I see you are still busy making a dog's bollocks out of every single 20th-century fashion article with your inept editions and arbitry removal of text which has been stable over a number of years. You are also guilty of employing a number of sockpuppets. As a result of the "work" you did on 1970s in fashion, chunks of the page are missing and the end result is little better than a child's essay. There are editots who would have happily collaborated with you to improve the fashion pages. Why didn't you ask on the talk pages?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 11:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Feels So Good (Show Me Your Love)
added links pointing to Electronic and Freestyle
On My Own (Peach Union song)
added links pointing to Electronic and Pop
Breaking All The Rules (She Moves song)
added a link pointing to Electronic
Peach (pop band)
added a link pointing to On My Own
Set U Free (Planet Soul song)
added a link pointing to Electronic
Tell Me (Groove Theory song)
added a link pointing to Pop
Thank You (Dido song)
added a link pointing to Electronic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Set U Free (Planet Soul song) edit

Hello, ArtistsCry13,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Set U Free (Planet Soul song) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Set U Free (Planet Soul song) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,   Bfpage |leave a message  23:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to In the Meantime (Spacehog song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | Released = March 19, 1996 (US)<ref>{[cite web|url=http://www.discogs.com/Spacehog-In-The-Meantime/release/1104559 |title=Spacehog - In
  • }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steal My Sunshine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:US Cover Ace of Base The Sign.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:US Cover Ace of Base The Sign.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:29, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Aqua Barbie Girl US Cover.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Aqua Barbie Girl US Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fly (Sugar Ray song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 11 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cleopatra's Theme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comin' Atcha!. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015 edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Chandelier (Sia song). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. 123.136.111.101 (talk) 06:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Come Undone (Duran Duran song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Come Undone (Duran Duran song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Robvanvee 15:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. 123.136.107.234 (talk) 11:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, ArtistsCry13. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, ArtistsCry13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, ArtistsCry13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Dido Thank You US Cover.jpeg edit

 

The file File:Dido Thank You US Cover.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As described, this is the US promo release. It fails to comply with WP:NFCC#3a (minimal number of items) and WP:NFCC#8 (contextual significance). The other image is more preferable as it is part of retail release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Swing My Way 1998 Vinyl Single Cover Art.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Swing My Way 1998 Vinyl Single Cover Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Swing My Way 1998 Vinyl Single Cover Art.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Swing My Way 1998 Vinyl Single Cover Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply