Arnabb.bannerjee

Name- Arnab Banerjee

August 2014

Hello, I'm 5 albert square. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Samsung Electronics seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 12:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 00:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Arnabb.bannerjee, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Arnabb.bannerjee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham.... Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. KRIMUK90 ✉ 14:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Chander Pahar (film). — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Singham Returns

Please don't put the entire cast list in the infobox of film articles like you did in Singham Returns. Only the name of main actors should be included there. Also add source to verify the content you add. See WP:TRUTH. Rameshnta909 (talk) 16:49, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Fluffernutter. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sachin Tendulkar seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham credits

According to Template:Infobox film, "Insert the names of the actors as they are listed in the billing block of the poster for the film's original theatrical release. If unavailable, use the top-billed actors from the screen credits." In K3G, AB and JB are billed above SRK in the film credits, so that is why it's like that. Please leave it alone. BollyJeff | talk 18:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sachin Tendulkar‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Begoon ^talk 05:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Why do you do this? BollyJeff | talk 15:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Shah Rukh Khan. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Please read

If you are reverted, you need to discuss your edits on the article's talk page. Simply re-doing your edit again and again will only get you warned and then blocked. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for persistent addition of unsourced content and other unhelpful or disruptive changes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:45, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Please Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arnabb.bannerjee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I am very very very sorry about that. I know that I have done some disruptive edit but I wouldn't do it again. There really a big problem for me that I cannot submit the references in my information. So please help me. I am very upset to see some wrong editing. So I want to contribute myself.

Decline reason:

Firstly, your unblock request(s) won't be reviewed by the blocking admin, and instead will be reviewed by other admin(s). Secondly, an unblock request is normally granted if an admin considers that you will no longer cause disruption if unblocked. In other words, you need to convince the reviewing admin(s) that if unblocked, you won't cause any further disruption. In your unblock request, you seem to actually do the opposite, when you say that you can't add references. For what's it worth, you don't necessarily need to convince the blocking admins that you are sorry. In this context, I am declining this unblock request. I suggest that you read the verifiability policy, and learn about how to add references. From there, I suggest you write a new unblock request which focuses on convincing the reviewing admin(s) that if unblocked, you won't cause any further disruption, because you can add content that is properly referenced. PhilKnight (talk) 09:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SORRY!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arnabb.bannerjee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm veryvery sorry I wouldn't do it again. Please unblock me

Decline reason:

This request wholly fails to respond to the immediately previous unblock request rejection. Merely saying sorry, as you have been told, will not do. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request

{{Unblock|I have appealed two times for unblock me or reviewed my block reasons but no one no admin support me. I don't no why. If I mistake something so help how to appeal about a block. Now I am disquiet. Help me. I do not have any issue of my mistake.}}

Talk page access revoked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  PhilKnight (talk) 11:56, 1 November 2014 (UTC)