User talk:ArchonMagnus/Archive 1

Wiki-Welcome

Hello ArchonMagnus, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Becky Sayles (talk) 14:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Page Protection of The Joker (comics)

You are welcome. Great minds think alike. LOL. I did this because I saw that it was getting out of hand again. Bearian (talk) 00:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks a lot for the Barnstar!! LeaveSleaves (talk) 20:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

74.8.175.234

Will you report this IP address on WP:AIV or shall I? I will look here for your answer --Gerry Ashton (talk) 18:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I will. I'm already in the process of doing so. Thanks for helping with the vandal, though. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 18:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

hello world so u have found me but do u know me this is my message to u ArchonMagnus what is time but that which flows through all have u heard of the borg hack i encountered them or it once long ago and have been searching ever since by the way i know this wont stop u from banning me but this is a public computer so please do not harm the others that use this comp good morning starshine the Earth says hello end... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.130.162.178 (talk) 16:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

TYVM

Thanks for catching the vandalism on my user page. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 16:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Always happy to help! —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 20:00, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Me too -- you restored my user page before I even noticed that it had been blanked, many thanks! HMishkoff (talk) 01:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

		The Original Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this barnstar for your super speedy reversal of vandalism to the Prison Break article. You beat me to it by a hairs breadth. Good work--Brideshead (talk) 18:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism?

We can have a difference of opinion as to whether or not the title, "the Great" should be appended to JPII, but it is either rude or ignorant of you to describe my placement of that title as vandalism. There are millions of people who agree that this pope should be only the 3rd or 4th in history to be so named, and in no way is it vandalism to call him that. On the contrary, I can make a much stronger case that it is vandalism (and perhaps anti-Catholic) on your part to remove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.218.205.145 (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC) What is your problem, Magnus? Do you even know what vandalism is? Do you define it as anything that you've never heard of before? You are really a piece of work.

The point is that it is information backed purely by original research or opinion. If you can provide a valid resource that proves the inclusion of your edits, please cite your sources and the information will stay in the article. However, this is an encyclopaedia and, as such, should contain only verifiable information. Please see Wikipedia:NOR and Wikipedia:MOS. I'll be happy to discuss this with you, but please keep the information in the article verifiable. Thanks! —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 22:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Omigod you are such a MORON! Citing the "living persons" policy regarding John Paul II and his predecessors! They're all DEAD, you fucking idiot. Now at least I won't take offense to your idiotic reverts, because I can see that you don't know any better!

I know that Pope John Paul II has passed; however, there exists a Wikipedia template regarding the insertion of controversial, unverified, or outright false information into biographies that is otherwise applicable to the edits you are making. I stand by decision to revert your edits until you have a valid source to cite with the pertinent information. As always, I'll be happy to discuss this with you and help you to improve the article as needed. However, please leave keep to fact rather than personal opinion and bias, as this is an encyclopaedia. Thanks. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 02:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Slave Hack notability

Yep, basically you nailed it, what it really needs is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" as WP:GNG says. If you know of any articles or reviews in major gaming magazines, websites, etc., that would be a great addition and go a long way towards establishing notability. --Stormie (talk) 03:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you very much for the Barnstar and your appreciation.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Flagged Revs

Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 06:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Admin

Hi, I was wondering if you get paid to be an admin?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.157.169.216 (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC) 

I'm not an admin. I'm not even a privileged user. I'm just a ordinary editor.—Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 20:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Lamborghini article

how come my stuff got deleted on lamborghini page and the other crap didnt do something about it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.244.147 (talk) 21:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

I was in the progress of restoring the original article actually. My intervention was to halt the continuation. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 21:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Please tell me this was an accident!

 – iridescent 22:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Dammit! Yes. I meant to revert to the edit prior to that one—my fault. Thanks for catching that one! —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 22:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Warning

Stop this. Now. --Deskana (talk) 00:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Could you please explain your demand? I happened to notice several names that seemed similar and was trying to prevent a user from personal attacks. If there is an error, I do apologize, but if so could you please explain how I was in error? I'm sorry for the trouble, but as I stated earlier, I was assuming the worst. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 00:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Preventing personal attacks by accusing NawlinWiki of creating a load of attack accounts attacking himself? In my expert opinion, you may be off your rocker. --Deskana (talk) 00:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

(edit conflict) All of these accounts were created to harass NawlinWiki, one of our most active administrators. I understand your intentions, but at a glance this looked like a bad-faith effort on your part. Please be very, very careful with accusations of sockpuppetry in future. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, that's what I thought. I was about ready to block you, ArchonMagnus. I suggest you be more careful in the future. --Deskana (talk) 00:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Like I said, I'm sorry. I don't know to whom the "real" account belongs. I don't know NawlinWiki from any of the other Nawlins that were listed, and assumed someone was attempting foulery. I'm glad that the matter was settled, but I was merely trying to help. Apparently, I succeeded in only discouraging myself. Thanks anyway. I'll stay away from WP:SSP for a while. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 00:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Friendly advice: please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Identification and handling of suspected sock puppets. Always remember to check editors' user pages and contribution history before jumping to any conclusions about them, and never assume the worst—leave that to folks who've been around here longer :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

The problem was that you didn't look at user creation logs or contributions. NW's first edit was June 2005 (the user creation log cannot catch usernames created before a certain date). Every other account was created in at least 2006 (Nawlin was created in October 2006), so the likelihood that Nawlin's the sockmaster here is nil. I also heavily doubt an administrator would make deliberately-attacky names against himself; NawlinWiki's a known JarlaxleArtemis target. -Jéské Couriano ^{(v^_^v)} 01:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I see that now. I do apologize to NawlinWiki and see that I made a mistake. I am usually here reverting vandalism, that's what I feel more confortable with anyway. I really let my newb-ness show that time (please don't WP:BITE.) Sorry for the screw-up, everyone. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 01:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Null persperation, chummer, just do everyone a favor and next time you file an SSP report, do some research first, okay? -Jéské Couriano ^{(v^_^v)} 04:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

I am wondering about this. You stated in the edit summary that it may not meet WP:N, but you have also added A1 speedy tag. It does not meet the criteria because the context is clearly stated. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 12:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Colossus and the Crab

Hi, if you're adding a subject-specific stub tag please don't also add {{stub}} - just wastes time of people at WP:WSS. Thanks. PamD (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Thanks for the info. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 16:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kanonkas

Thank you ArchonMagnus for voting in my successfully closed RfA! I'm glad that you trust me. Ping me if you need anything! Best regards, --Kanonkas :  Talk  19:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Black Dog, Barghest

Hi just wanted to leave you a quick message to say I'd like to chat to you about the Black Dog. I am very busy at the moment with work as have just started a new job but will leave my E-mail address which I check nearly every day if would like to exchange some E-mails on the subject. I saw the Balck Dog when i was a child about 12 yrs old and can remember evrything in alot of detail. This ocurred in East Anglia but very far from the coast where the dog is normally seen in folklore but is in keeping with the locations that it seems to appear in Cornwall and Devon on Heathland and moorland and other wild places that are not urban or true agricultural land. My E-mail is neptunesangel@hotmail.co.uk and my name is Carlos. Please get back to me at your conveinance to discuss in greater detail. Thanks Carlos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.101.215.190 (talk) 18:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

I picked up the revert, thanks, jimfbleak (talk) 15:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

No problem. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 15:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Stop changing my posts. I go through all of this work, and you go and change them back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.158.123.29 (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Then, please, stop vandalizing pages on Wikipedia as you did here and here. We are, in fact, trying to run an encyclopedia here. Thank you. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 18:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

RfA thankspam

		Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith (talk), 22:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Denbot (talk) 22:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Repost of Slave Hack

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Slave Hack, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Slave Hack was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Slave Hack, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Screenshot Slave Hack.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot Slave Hack.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Slave Hack logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Slave Hack logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 80 support, 2 oppose, and 1 neutral. I appreciate all the comments I received and will endeavor to justify the trust the community has placed in me. R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

thank you

My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in, and I wanted to let you know I appreciated all of the comments, advice, criticism, and seriously took it all to heart this past week. I'll do my absolute best to not let any of you down with the incredible trust given me today. rootology (C)(T) 08:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again! --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 23:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Well Done!

Well done!

	Chubbennaitor's Hidden Barnstar
	This user has found Chubbennaitor's Secret Page and proudly exhibits this award. See if you can find the hay-coloured pin in a haystack link?Ver. 2.5

Chubbennaitor 21:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks much! —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 21:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Battle of the Boyne

Is the question mark on the title "A sectarian battle" really necessary? The discussion of the legitimacy of term sectarian should be held within the paragraph itself, not in its title. An encylopedia of your caliber should not be subject to such sloppy usage of titles.

Good Day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.123.37.194 (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure. You should place your concerns in the article's discussion page at Talk:Battle of the Boyne. My reversion was primarily due to the edit you did here. I would recommend addressing your concern in the discussion page and one of the editors that is familiar with the topic will help you. If you have any other questions or concerns, please let either myself or another editor know. Thanks! —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 15:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank You!

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 61 support, 3 oppose, and 1 neutral Cheers! Nja247 19:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

USA at the olympics

Hey man im sorry what happened it was my friend from China (chinese nationality he was pissed that they didn't win the medalcount in 2008 im sorry about what happened because i also root for the us team in the olympic Sorry-Mez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.192.32.63 (talk) 13:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

RFA

Hi Archon, belated post holiday thanks for your support and nice comments in my RFA, your wishing me good luck seems to have worked as it passed by an embarrassingly wide margin. There's a full glitzy Oscar style version of my acceptance speech here. WereSpielChequers 10:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Nice work

I really appreciate that you caught this after I missed it, and I doubly appreciate that your edit summary made it clear that it was not me that you were reverting. That was a classy way to handle that. Unschool 06:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Unschool has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

No worries, friend. Thanks for the Cookie! —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 19:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

re: Barnstar

No problem, and thanks for the barnstar, it's my very first! SheepNotGoats (Talk) 00:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar

Thanks a lot! That's a second one from you! ^LeaveSleaves 02:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

ThankSpam

My RfA Thank you for participating in my "RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (Ceoil, Noroton and Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. I recognise that the process itself was unusual, and the format was generally considered questionable - and I accept that I was mistaken in my perception of how it would be received - but I am particularly grateful for those whose opposes and neutrals were based in perceptions of how I was not performing to the standards expected of an administrator. As much as the support I received, those comments are hopefully going to allow me to be a better contributor to the project. Thank you. Very much. LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC) ~~~~~

Well, back to the office it is...

WikiBirthday

I saw from here that it's been exactly one year since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 02:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! See, this is why I like WP. The community is great! Thanks again! —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 02:55, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Way to Go!

Dear ArchonMagnus,

Thank you for undo-ing my edit! We are teachers in a class on teaching children to validate their sources of information. Our group was trying to show how easy it is to edit Wikipedia and that it can't be trusted, but you proved us wrong. We were going to delete it in a few minutes anyway.

Amber —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.3.203.2 (talk) 16:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

quick reversion/ nonsense article

Dear Mr Fieldday:ArchonMagnus, I tried to edit (in a very negative way- but wait) an article on the "Bowen Technique", related to an article on Frozen Shoulder. At Frozen Shoulder I removed the reference to "Bowen Technique" because the reference did not make sense. When I went to "Bowen Technique" I said the article "is nonsense", because it was poorly framed and referenced. Most of the discussion says the same thing. In fact, what I considered doing was to nuke the whole article. I got a very quick, and I think automatic, reversion, saying something like I ought to read the instructions because my comment was not constructive. Where to start. If the article had referred to a completely discredited therapy, should we have a debate about its' usefulness? Or should we just nuke it? I'm new at this, and not dogmatic about it, but I think we should excise the whole article. Why should we keep it in Wikipedia? I can't think of a reason. Thanks, Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.63.192.26 (talk) 17:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

If you feel the article should be removed from Wikipedia, please submit the article to articles for deletion and state your reasoning. It will be reviewed by members of the community and if the consensus is deletion, an administrator will take that action.

Also, I'm not Fieldday-sunday. So you may want to communicate with that editor since he is the one who made those reversions.

If you have any other questions/comments, please let me know. Thanks. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 14:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Please update your status with WP:VG

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in the recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

• Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
• Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ajax (comics)

added links pointing to Steve Harris, Reggie Jones and Joe Kelly

T-Ray (comics)

added a link pointing to Joe Kelly

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Weapon X members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Kelly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Potential admin

Hi, I notice you're on Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls. Wikipedia would benefit from more admins. If you have been editing for more than 12 months (preferably 24+ months), and have been editing fairly consistently for the past 6 months (preferably 12+ months) with at least 100 edits a month (this tool will help) - or an explanation for any gaps, and haven't been blocked in the past three years - or a good explanation for a recent block, don't have a recent history of edit warring or arguing with other editors, feel you can explain why you wish to be an admin, can demonstrate some understanding of Wikipedia's procedures and processes, or know where to go for guidance, and are confident enough to go through a RfA, please get in touch with me. We can talk about it some more, and if all looks OK, I'll nominate you. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 01:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for considering me; however, I don't think I'm ready. I'm really flattered that anyone would consider me, and I would consider it a privilege. I have the time-in-residency and I think I have a good knowledge of the Wikipedia policies and procedures, but my edit counts are way too low. Also right now with my job, grad school, and family life (I've got two infants at home) I'm not sure that I can devote the time needed to be a quality admin. I use Wikipedia daily and I'm glad for those that can contribute where I don't think I can. Once again, thank you for the consideration but I feel that I should decline right now.—Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 15:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Cool. Let know when you think you are ready and we can talk about it some more. I haven't yet looked into your contributions to see what areas you need to concentrate on - I can do that as and when you feel you have the time to look more closely into the issue, though doing maintenance work, taking part in AfD, RfC, bringing an article to GA or doing a GA review, are all areas that would be useful. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:50, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)