I am Aaron Perlut, executive director of a 501c3 not-for-profit organization called the American Mustache Institute. We have previously posted articles about our organization and purpose, and they were removed. We understand concerns voiced by Mike Rosoft, and wish to have our entry reconsidered please which I am including below. You will also find several examples of international media coverage about our organization. Thank you for your consideration. I am including below our proposed entry:


WHAT IS THE AMERICAN MUSTACHE INSTITUTE'

The American Mustache Institute(AMI) is an advocacy organization and registered 501(c)(3) not-for-profit based in St. Louis, Missouri.

Originally formed in St. Louis in the Summer of 2006, AMI is a global membership organization which advocates for greater acceptance of mustaches in the workplace and throughout modern culture.

Efforts by AMI have been chronicled by the London Daily Telegraph, the Dallas Morning News, USA Today, the New York Times, and The Learning Channel among other popular media.

Part of the organization’s charter includes commitment to supporting communities in which it works, and therefore created a charitable fundraising mechanism for organizations such as Challenger Baseball, a baseball league for disabled children.

HOW AMI ACTS

AMI held its first charitable fundraiser – 'Stache Bash 2006 – in July 2006. The event raised awareness of the issue of mustache acceptance, supported mustached Americans, and raised funds for Challenger Baseball.

For ‘Stache Bash 2007, AMI created the “Greatest Sports Mustache” contest, which was won in a popular vote by former Major League Baseball player Keith Hernandez. The event raised enough funds to allow Challenger Baseball to add six new teams for the 2008 campaign.

Among others, leading up to ‘Stache Bash 2007, Matt Marrone of the New York Daily News referred to AMI as, "truly one of the most august bodies in the United States today ..."

ONGOING EFFORTS BY AMI

AMI continues its efforts of building a global community to help revive the mustache and will continue to hold its marquee 'Stache Bash event each year in St. Louis (scheduled for October 25, 2008).

Speedy deletion of American Mustache Institute edit

 

A tag has been placed on American Mustache Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bstone (talk) 19:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm unable to find any indication that this organization is sufficiently notable for inclusion; if you feel otherwise, please provide sources. evildeathmath 18:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm the originator. I'm working with Peter Symonds in trying to get this correct and appropriate. There is linking to other media citing the organization

I've left some initial comments on the article's talk page. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Veiled Prophets edit

Hello, I am inquiring as to an image that was posted by a 3rd party on the Wiki page of the Veiled Prophets (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veiled_Prophet_Ball), a civic group in St. Louis. There is an image there of a Ku Klux Klansman that is in no way affiliated with the organization and the organization wishes to have it removed but hopes to do this through the proper channels. Can you please advise? Thank you


Your submission at Articles for creation: Atomic Junkshot (May 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 00:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Aperlut! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 00:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atomic Junkshot (June 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Atomic Junkshot concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Atomic Junkshot, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Atomic Junkshot edit

 

Hello, Aperlut. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Atomic Junkshot".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Atomic Junkshot edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atomic Junkshot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atomic Junkshot (May 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 19:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atomic Junkshot (May 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 19:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atomic Junkshot (May 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 22:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply