Alsoriano97, you are invited to the Teahouse!Edit

 

Hi Alsoriano97! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016Edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of people named in the Panama Papers  with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I am striking the above message. I misunderstood your edit, partly because the Huggle program shows only the immediate change. So your purpose was good. It would be good to explain not just your change but that you are working on further changes in the edit summary. The removal of a name was a mistake on my part. Reverting an edit is all or nothing. This usually does not matter but in this case took a further change with it. Since there have been further edits by you, I cannot restore your edit without disturbing the further edits and probably not being able to get them as you want them. You will have to do that if you have not done so already. Sorry for the mistake and inconvenience. Donner60 (talk) 23:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! I will restore only two thing and don't worry, I prefer being helped in things that I do wrong

May 2016Edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dénia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | leader_party = [[(Spanish Socialist Workers' Party|PSOE]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people named in the Panama Papers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PRO and Ignacio González. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people named in the Panama Papers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 JuneEdit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jorge Fernández Díaz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PP and Podemos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, Alsoriano97. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

2016 deathsEdit

Please note that to be eligible for inclusion, the person must have had 9 interwikis before their death. Both Rita Barberá and La Veneno fail this criterion, so they were removed again. Please get consensus on the talk page if you think either should be included anyway. — Yerpo Eh? 13:38, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

I don't understand when you talk about "9 interwikis". What did this exacly mean?
And about Rita Barberá...she was considerated the Mayoress of Spain, one of the great mayors Spain had (but involved in huge corruption scandals)
Thank you,
Sorry if my English is bad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsoriano97 (talkcontribs)
Please read WP:RY#Deaths. "Interwikis" is short for "non-English-language Wikipedia articles", and probably shouldn't be used where there is a question of language comprehension. If you do not understand WP:RY#Births and WP:RY#Deaths, we could work together to find a phrasing which you can better understand; but it is a guideline. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

-I am very sorry, I am new to this and I still don't understand it. Can you help me? Or can you make the change that I would like to be able to do? Thank you very much and I apologize for the inconvenience,

A big greeting

To put it simply: do not add Rita Barberá or La Veneno to the list in 2016, because they are not important enough. Do you understand now? — Yerpo Eh? 13:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

I repeat: she was the mayor of the third largest city in Spain and for 24 years the most powerful of the State. There is the reason for my insistence, in Spain it was, and a lot. Or is it that in my country and in others Frank Finley was so important? I can understand that La Veneno does not, but Rita will grant you yes, and much more than you think. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38075458 http://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2016/11/23/foto/podemos_minuto_silenzio_rita_barbera-152640183/1/#1 http://www.wsj.com/articles/rita-barbera-mayoress-of-spain-dies-1479922282


If she was important in Spain, her death can be noted on the page 2016 in Spain. But not many people wrote about her in other Wikipedia languages, so she was probably not so important internationally - only international importance matters for main year articles. — Yerpo Eh? 16:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
I notice that, despite the discussion above in which is made perfectly clear that Rita Barberá should not be included in 2016, you decided to add her again. This suggests you are not here to edit co-operatively. If you persist you can expect more official warnings. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 23:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
I know, but she have 10 non-English pages. The rules requires a minimum of 9. The rules, are the rules.—Alsoriano97 @DerbyCountyinNZ:(Talk Contribs) 22:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

ItalyEdit

Please read the comment near the name of the prime minister before changing it, thanks! Alex2006 (talk) 15:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

I read it, but I thought that now it's useful due to the change of PM. Sorry if I offended you

Un saluto

Disambiguation link notification for March 20Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinatown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Zone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

July 2017Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to 2013, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Arthur, apologise me for this mistake. Have a good day. — Alsoriano97

Deaths in 2017 inclusionsEdit

Hi. I have noticed the good work you are doing at the page above. However, would it be possible for you to note the following two things?

1. When coding your subject line, and the reference is in a language other than English, could you please leave one space between the reference part and the icon code; like: "[reference URL and headline] {{es icon}}"?

2. When putting the source headline into the reference part, please don't add extra full stops/stops at the end where they don't exist at the reference page.

Otherwise, you are doing some great stuff at the page, keep it up! Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 20:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


Good night, Mr. Thank for your words and advice, I only want to help. I am not very expert in Wikipedia so it is quite usual that I make mistakes, that I will learn from them. But I do not understand the second point of the advice, what do you mean?

Thank you and have a nice day. I will learn little by little. Alsoriano97 22:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Each reference URL (web address) has a headline at the top of the page announcing a death. We use that headline in the coding of the entry: like, "reference URL"(space)"reference page headline". But, we ALWAYS use the headline exactly as it appears on the reference page, without adding full stops/periods nor removing them. The only exception is when headlines are written in capital/upper case letters - we then convert them to lower case letters for the Deaths page. The best thing is to go into the edit code of the whole Deaths in 2017 page and have a look at how others do it when they've been coding sources into other past entries. Hope this helps and makes things a little clearer. Good day to you too. Ref (chew)(do) 16:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I have already noted today that you have taken my advice on board, and your entries are now perfect from the very first edit. Well done and glad I could help. Happy editing. Ref (chew)(do) 18:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Wikipedia can only work well if those who are part like us try to do things right, so I, as a beginner, should follow the advice of those who know more than me to learn and improve Wikipedia. If you see that I still do something wrong or I make some kind of mistake, let me know.

A greeting from Spain. Alsoriano97 Alsoriano97Special:Contributions/Alsoriano97 23:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC) @Refsworldlee:

  The Editor's Barnstar
For meritorious editing of the Deaths in 2017 page! Greetings from England and keep up the good work. Ref (chew)(do) 20:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


Thank you very much, Sir, for this award. I will keep it with much appreciation. We will continue to do Wikipedia great.Alsoriano97 Alsoriano97Special:Contributions/Alsoriano97 23:29 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in RedEdit

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.14% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
  • Our priorities for November:

The Women in Red World Contest

  • Continuing from month to month:

#1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for registering as a member of WiR. I look forward to lots of contributions on Spanish/Catalan women. If ever you run into problems or need assistance, just leave a message on my talk page. You are of course also welcome to contribute to our discussions on the WiR talk page. Hablo tambien Castillano y comprendo Catalán.--Ipigott (talk) 14:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

WiR December highlightsEdit

Welcome to Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons.


New: "Seasonal celebrations" "First Ladies" "Go local!"


Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Remember the World Contest closes on Thursday, 30 November

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Alsoriano97. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!Edit

Welcome to Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons.



New: "Prisoners"

New: "Fashion designers"

New: "Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland"


Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Feburary 2018 at Women in RedEdit

Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.

New: "Black women"

New: "Mathematicians and statisticians"

New: "Geofocus: Island women"

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women's History Month 2018 at Women in RedEdit

Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.


Historically, our March event has been one of the biggest offerings of the year. This year, we are collaborating with two other wiki communities. Our article campaign is the official on-line/virtual node for Art+Feminism. Our image campaign supports the Whose Knowledge? initiative. Women's History Month 2018

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for March 23Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marta Rovira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018 at Women in RedEdit

Welcome to Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons.


Focus on: April+Further with Art+Feminism Archaeology Military history (contest) Geofocus: Indian subcontinent

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred --Rosiestep (talk) 12:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Gemma Romanyà i VallsEdit

Hello I wanted to invite you to take another look at the article you created on Gemma Romanyà i Valls. I find gender references in it very confusing, and am unsure whether certain events refer to her or her husband. I have my doubts about this article meeting our WP:NBIO criteria, so was considering putting this article forward to Articles for deletion for discussion. However, seeing your interest in WP:WOMRED, which I support, I wanted to offer you an opportunity to address these concerns and to tease out any reasons that do establish notability here, and to fix one of the two citations which does not function. Many thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Santi Ibáñez moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Santi Ibáñez, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. KingAndGod 06:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attributionEdit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2017 Barcelona attacks to Mariano Rajoy (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018 at Women in RedEdit

Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.



New: "Women of the Sea"

New: "Villains"

New: "Women in Sports"

New: "Central Eastern European women"


Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for May 13Edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 Spanish constitutional crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna Gabriel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red June EditathonsEdit

Welcome to Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons.



New: WiR Loves Pride

New: Singers and Songwriters

New: Women in GLAM

New: Geofocus: Russia/USSR


Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A page you started (Antonio Giuliano) has been reviewed!Edit

Thanks for creating Antonio Giuliano, Alsoriano97!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed, thanks for creating.

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 01:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in studyEdit

Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.

Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 22:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018 at Women in RedEdit

Hello again from Women in Red!


July 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: Sub-Saharan Africa Film + stage 20th-century Women Rock
Continuing: Notable women, broadly-construed!


Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Phil Gowan for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phil Gowan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Gowan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 07:25, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

August 2018 at Women in RedEdit

An exciting new month for Women in Red!


August 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10
Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
Notable women, broadly-construed!



For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative

  • All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
  • It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August.
  • Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Decorations for Luis PlanasEdit

Hi Alsoriano97! I see you added honorary decorations to Luis Planas title, however, there is no mention of them in the article itself. Is it possible you could cite where you found these, that'd be most helpful. Thanks! Snickers2686 (talk) 18:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Deaths in 2018Edit

Hello, when you add persons to the Deaths in 2018 page, please note that they shall be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 13:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Good afternoon. I know that and I try to do it everytime I add persons. This time was just a mistake. Thanks for the report. Alsoriano97 (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Wood (festival) editsEdit

Dear Alsoriano97, please check the result of your 2 edits to the page above. The link you created does not work as it is within the text of an external link already. It also generates an error; see Category:CS1 errors: URL–wikilink conflict. Regards,  GILO   A&E  19:44, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Oh Sir, my apologies. Sometimes we do things too fast and we do not realize the mistakes. Thanks for the report. Kind regards. Alsoriano97. 19:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018 at Women in RedEdit

September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!



New: Women currently in academics Women + Law Geofocus: Hispanic countries

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Check it out: Monthly achievement initiative

  • All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
  • It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in September.
  • Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ways to improve Pedro RoncalEdit

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Alsoriano97, thanks for creating Pedro Roncal!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. When you translate an article from a foreign language Wikipedia, you should provide attribution, as I have now done on the article's talk page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018 at Women in RedEdit

Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!



New: Clubs Science fiction + fantasy STEM The Mediterranean

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

You like cake!?Edit

File:Blood Orange Chiffon Cake with Mango Curd (Unsplash).jpg Qwerty number1 (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Oops!, As u can seeim not great at that! Will a kittie do?

Qwerty number1 (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

PreciousEdit

biographies from Spanish

Thank you for quality biographies, with a focus on Catalan and Spanish women, often translated, such as Rita Barberá, Rosa Maria Ibarra, Luisa Pastor Lillo and Paloma Adrados, for dealing with Recent deaths, creating more articles and supporting, - Albert, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 2240 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Get ready for November with Women in Red!Edit

Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives



New: Religion Deceased politicians Asia

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ways to improve Marija VučinovićEdit

Hi, I'm SkyGazer 512. Alsoriano97, thanks for creating Marija Vučinović!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for creating this article, it looks nice overall. There are several unclear sentences and punctuation/grammatical issues which could use some copy-editing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 15:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Alsoriano97. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Alsoriano97. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018 at Women in RedEdit

The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.



New: Photography Laureates Countries beginning with 'I'

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Rosiestep (talk) 13:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for November 29Edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deaths in 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Plate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Removals at 2018Edit

Yesterday, I reverted your removals - for the second time - of some recent deaths at 2018, because you hadn't given a good reason for removing them. I made this point very clearly in the edit-summary. Only four hours later, you then simply removed Harry Leslie Smith (who is obviously internationally notable, you only have to look at the obituaries) again without leaving an edit-summary. I suggest very strongly that if you believe an entry should be removed, you must make your reasoning clear in the edit-summary (after all, you might be right!). As you are not doing so, and reverting as well, your editing is starting to become disruptive. Please stop doing this. Black Kite (talk) 09:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019 at Women in RedEdit

January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108


Happy New Year from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons.

January events: Women of War and Peace Play!

January geofocus: Caucasus

New, year-long initiative: Suffrage

Continuing global initiative: #1day1woman2019

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list
Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list
Image attribution: Nevit Dilmen (CC BY-SA 3.0)

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for January 25Edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elio Berhanyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019 at Women in RedEdit

February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111


Happy February from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons.

February events: Social Workers Black Women

February geofocus: Ancient World

Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman2019

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe

Join the conversations on our talkpage:


Image attribution: Johntex (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Frank RobinsonEdit

Hi, sorry to disturb you right, but I need some help with something on the 2019 talk page, an admin thinks he's allowed to erase info that he think's isn't notable to him. So I started a discussion on the talk page and I wondering If we could share your opinion. Matt Campbell (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019 at Women in RedEdit

March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113


Happy Women's History Month from Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:
March: Art+Feminism & #VisibleWikiWomen
Geofocus: Francophone Women
Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman


Other ways you can participate:
Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe
Join the conversations on our talkpage
Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred
Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ITN recognition for José Pedro Pérez-LlorcaEdit

 On 11 March 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article José Pedro Pérez-Llorca, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019 at Women in RedEdit

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117


Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!Edit

May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121


Hello and welcome to the May events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events with WIREdit

June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125


Check out what's happening in June at Women in Red:

Virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

July events from Women in Red!Edit

July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128


Check out what's happening in July at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Initiatives we support:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Marta FabbriEdit

 

The article Marta Fabbri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NPOL. There is absolutely nothing inherently notable about being a mayor of a community of less than 1,000 people.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 23:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Marta Fabbri for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marta Fabbri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marta Fabbri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 03:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Carmen Ros NortesEdit

Nice job messing up this entry. Adding citations that add nothing, just repeat the Vatican announcement, while being sloppy about citations and making the false claim that she is a member. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Fernando de la RúaEdit

 On 9 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Fernando de la Rúa, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Stephen 23:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019 at Women in RedEdit

August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131


Check out what's happening in August at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Moira Millán moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Moira Millán, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@Interstellarity: Next time try to read all the article and sources. Moira Millán's page have enough sources and citations. Alsoriano97 18:37, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moira Millán has been acceptedEdit

Moira Millán, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MJLTalk 01:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pagesEdit

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 at Women in RedEdit

September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135


Check out what's happening in September at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ITN recognition for Camilo SestoEdit

 On 13 September 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Camilo Sesto, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

SpencerT•C 04:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

GuidelinesEdit

Concerning your repeteated additions [1][2][3] of the same blurb on Portal:Current events/2019 September 19, a reminder of the guideline: "Do not list the ordinary deaths of prominent persons here. That's what recent deaths is for. Exceptions to this rule are made for prominent persons who died in office (such as Pope John Paul II and Omar Bongo) or other instances where the death in itself has a major impact." Also a reminder that a talk page is available for arguments. Wakari07 (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in RedEdit

October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140


Check out what's happening in October at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

CivilityEdit

Edit summaries such as this and this aren't compatible with civility policy. This isn't a battleground. Madness Darkness 21:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2019 at Women in RedEdit

November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143


Check out what's happening in November at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIREdit

December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147


Check out what's happening in December at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2020 at Women in RedEdit

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

2020Edit

It appears we had an edit conflict. Please reinsert your additions or 18:25 UTC, if you think them appropriate. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Please disregard. The edit conflict resolution system, surprisingly enough, worked. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Infanta Pilar, Duchess of BadajozEdit

 On 13 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Infanta Pilar, Duchess of Badajoz, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

2020 DeathsEdit

Why are you removing the picture of the late Edd Byrnes? There is plenty of room for all three pictures and he was a popular Tv star of the 1950s and 1960s. There is no reason for his picture to not be there. Could please ask what you mean by "Not yet". Thank you in advance for your reply.Radiohist (talk) 01:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

The discussion is not about if he was enough popular to be there or not. If I hidded the pic is because at that moment there was not enough space to put the pic. When the list will be larger, there's no doubt he will be included.Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
There is clear bias because you keep hiding the pic in spite of the fact that he unfortunately passed before the other people whose pictures you are showing.Radiohist (talk) 14:30, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Removal of Current Event.Edit

Hello, I am wondering why you removed my comment on 2 cases of the Coronavirus at Miami University. I had the section at Portal:Current events/2020 January 28

Also, Why did you remove information about a 500k robbery. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I appreciate your willingness to collaborate on Wikipedia and specifically "Current events". But both news are not especially relevant. In "Current Events" news of very important international or national impact are collected, it is not the case of both news. For example, about the 2 university students who have undergone tests for suspected coronovirus. The same thing happened with a Chinese citizen in Barcelona today, and it was not mentioned here because it is not important. And many other cases in Spain and other countries. If it is shown that they are infected, we would open the debate if it is necessary to expose it. Greeting Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for responding. I do agree with you on the suspected students. However, I do not agree with why a $500,000 robbery on a former NBA star is not relevant. Could you explain a little more on that? Elijahandskip (talk) 01:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
As I told you: "Stop, seriously. This is a PRIVATE affair with NO international nor national notability. If we were to collect the thefts from celebrities this would be almost full. Please, stop". Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
This has received tons of articles, national news source articles, and it has been mentioned on Allen Iverson. $500,000 is a lot of money also. So far evidence points to it being notable enough to have it mentioned on that day. I agree all robberies don't need to be mentioned, but as this has tons of sources (Just type "Allen Iverson Robbed" on Google and you will see tons of articles about it). Could you explain how this as "NO international nor national notablilty"? -Thanks Elijahandskip (talk) 19:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

February with Women in RedEdit

February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155


Happy Valentine's Day from all of us at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Alternative account?Edit

It isn't clear why your user talk page User talk:Alsoriano97 redirects to User talk:Alsoriano. If this is a legitimate alternative account, the justification as at WP:VALIDALT should be explained, and the accounts should be linked as given at WP:ALTACCN. --David Biddulph (talk) 20:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

  • Yes - to rename your account, go to WP:USURP. The Alsoriano account exists, but has no edits, so you shouldn't have a problem taking it over. Meanwhile, you should move your talk page back. Black Kite (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at Irina Bogacheva (mezzo-soprano), did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TFFfan (talk) 12:20, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Question on notabilityEdit

You removed my post on Portal:Current events/2020 February 10 about a 500k seizure of cocaine. I am curious what type of seizure (money wise) would make it notable? I would think large sums of money, like 500k on a single guy would make it notable with reliable sources backing it up.

Thank you for replying Elijahandskip (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

WarningEdit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. This is for Portal:Current events/2020 February 10 in reverting edits.Elijahandskip (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

I only admit warnings from admins, not from angry editors. You are not making constructives editions as you are posting irrellevant news in Current Events. You can use use 2020 in United States for this kind of news. Current events is for INTERNATIONAL or RELEVANT FOR A COUNTRY news, not for enlist criminal cases from any country. 500K$ cocaine is more usual than you can think, and usual detentions of Chinese soldiers are not relevant. Check the news from another country to see if the new you want to enlist is important or not. I'm not going to keep this discussion as I'm very busy. Alsoriano97 (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Then you are in the wrong. Any editor can warn you anytime; administrators are only a regular editor who happens to have been granted a button to use to block you by the community, and at the community's behest. You are mistaken completely, and it is bad faith for you to continue to do so. John from Idegon (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Explanation wantedEdit

Would you be willing to explain why the following is not notable enough for the current events? Thank you for responding. (Trying to prevent editing wars) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC) "Monique N. Brady is sentenced to eight year in jail after a $10 million USD and for Obstruction an IRS investigation. (D.O.J.)"

It's not notable because is not a famous case, with a notable or famous condemned. I recommend you one thing, as I know you have good will: try to find out if the news you are looking for is in foreign newspapers. If so, go ahead. If not, you do not need to include it in Current Events. I'm a bit sure this is also not notable in th US. Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

QuestionEdit

Could you explain how the {{current related }] template is not good to put on articles related to topics in the Portal:Current events, especially for the day they were added? Elijahandskip (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

That it's set to current events does NOT imply that the "current events" template should be placed in the article referenced by the news. I have never seen anything like that. The template is mainly used in sections of articles and when they imply news, TRANSCENDENTAL changes that imply that the structure, the existence of that can change remarkably. (For example, the days when there was the effective dissolution of the Soviet nation could be used on the USSR page). Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Ok thank you for that clarification. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Re: Personal messageEdit

To Alsoriano97,

First and foremost, sorry for not replying to your message sooner. Life got busy for me and so I couldn't read your message until now. I don't believe that you were actively trying to be malicious with your edits. It was just that with your messages coming off as confrontational, it felt very out-putting considering the other people's edits were just well-intentioned contributions. And I guess what contributed to my outburst was I felt frustrated at feeling like I had to constantly justify my contributions when their (trans)national significance (at least to me) felt obvious. I also guess what lead to this clash was that we both have somewhat contradictory views on what the portal strives for: you wanting a "more globalist and plural vision" agenda, while me being fine with some national content as long as it was tied to national trends. Nonetheless I for my part will try to be more patient on this matter, especially since your actions came from a place of good intentions, and will try to remember that we all just want what is best for this website.

I didn't know that you contributed that long to the portal. I guess I only started noticing you when you removed that smuggling tunnel entry. :P

Sorry if this came off as rambling/disjointed or it didn't address parts of your message. I tried to address the main points as much as I could. Here's hoping we can bury the hatchet and move on. Mount Patagonia (talk) 08:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

P.S. I hope your having a better week now.

Disambiguation link notification for March 3Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francisco Fernández Marugán, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cáceres (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10Edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alfred Bosch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to El Periódico
Deaths in 2020 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to MEP

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17Edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020 at Women in RedEdit

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162


April offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

You need to have a better command of English to make useful contributions to English WikipediaEdit

Judging from this, your English is far below the level necessary to contribute text to English Wikipedia. There is not a shortage of fluent English speakers in the world, and adding such substandard text is worse than not contributing at all. Taresantia (talk) 12:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm not an English native speaker, as you can imagine, but you can't judge my level with such contribution. As you are the first person to make this observation, it's to be understood that my contributions on Wikipedia are not deficient. There is much more work here than judging without knowing the person and their contributions in this web. This is a community where we help each other. Sorry for not being perfect and I will keep working, here. A greeting. Alsoriano97 (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Alsoriano97, I found this post looking back over the contributions of Taresantia. Just a quick note that this user has now been blocked as a previously banned editor. I'm sure you know this, but just in case it helps for someone else to confirm: your contributions are appreciated, your English is generally fine, and what little grammar problems there are can always be cleaned up by others; it's a collaborative project. You didn't deserve this message, and handled it with grace. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
@Floquenbeam: First of all I want to apologize for not responding your message earlier, I've been very busy due to university issues. You cannot know how grateful I'm for your message. I know I need to improve my English level, that's one of my goals, and I'm working on it. I'm glad to be part of a community that works together and helps each other to make Wikipedia great for everyone. You can count on me in any case you need it. I wish you and yours have health. Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:43, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events.Edit

Hello Alsoriano07. I wanted to invite you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events as you have been a long time editor on Portal:Current events. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Enrique Múgica CommentEdit

Great sourcing work on the article - I've added my support to the RD nomination (I am just a user like yourself and don't have the final say) Have a great day (if that's possible in these strange times!) Joseywales1961 (talk) 12:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

@Joseywales1961 Thank you for the support, help and best thoughts! I'm up to help you in any case you need it in this community. I wish you and yours have the best possible health. Stay safe! Alsoriano97 (talk) 13:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Edem KodjoEdit

 On 13 April 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Edem Kodjo, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 07:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Enrique MúgicaEdit

 On 13 April 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Enrique Múgica, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Landelino Lavilla AlsinaEdit

 On 14 April 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Landelino Lavilla Alsina, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14Edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juan Cotino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Periódico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020 at Women in RedEdit

May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166


May offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Conflict of interestEdit

Hi, I'm Dantheanimator. I happened to notice on your user page that you declared yourself a neutralist. However, you also declared yourself a NATO supporter, Tibetan independence supporter, a monarchist, rejecter of British sovereignty over the Falkland islands, among many other sensitive issues. This may result in a conflict of interest in your editing of these and related topics. I therefore recommend that you consider changing your neutrality declaration or clarifying it. If you think my recommendation is false or have any issues, questions, or concerns, please leave a message in my talk page. Thank you. Dantheanimator (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

You, Dantheanimator are 100% incorrect. COI isn't a state of being....it only applies to specific edits, and your statement here shows a gross misunderstanding of our policies on WP:NPOV. Minimally, you need to retract this. It certainly could be considered an WP:NPA violation without specific edits evidencing it. Since this editor has been victimized by a rash of NPAs lately, I'm sure there are administrators watching. We all have views. There is no such thing as a "neutral" person. Good editors are more than capable of paraphrasing reliable secondary sources. My edits never indicate my politics, and the same is true for most experienced editors here. Keep your irrelevant opinions to yourself. This post says much more about your abilities rather than the owner of this talk page. John from Idegon (talk) 22:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
John from Idegon Thanks for you comment! Receive a kind greeting.Alsoriano97 (talk) 19:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
John from Idegon and Alsoriano97, I was going to comment earlier on this issue because I saw this talk page and read this but backed off because it's nothing new that I'm a cowardly editor, I easily back off because I don't like confrontations. But I'd like to say something. I'm Argentine, and on the Falklands/Malvinas issue I'm totally, totally neutral young man; i couldn't care less about both, the Islanders' wishes and Argentine government's wishes. I just hoped for dialogue and a turn-the-page policy. However, If I'm going to edit any Falklands/Malvinas-related article, I'd try to be as neutral as possible, supporting either cause If I do have a source. I also believe like John from Idegon that nobody is neutral on here, nor anywhere else. My best wishes to all of you. CoryGlee (talk) 20:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
I am tremendously sorry for this poorly thought out comment. I have only been with Wikipedia since the end of 2019, so my knowledge of the official policies, standards, etc., is limited to whatever I am told from veteran editors like you. I retract my statement. Thank you for informing me of the proper rules, I greatly appreciate it. To my knowledge, I am not allowed to delete any threads of another Wikipedian's talk page. If I am wrong, please tell me, so that I may learn and fix this issue. I personally do not care who owns the Falkland islands or about most of the issues I said, I just thought they were contentious issues. Again, I am very, very sorry for this post. Dantheanimator (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

In response to your replyEdit

Thank you for responding and good to hear. Regards, Dan Dantheanimator (talk) 20:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Julio AnguitaEdit

 On 18 May 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Julio Anguita, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 15:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Civility Barnstar
Sorry for my rude message. Thank you for not taking it to hard on me. Dantheanimator (talk) 17:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

@Dantheanimator: I appreciate very much your apologize. Obviously, you don't have to worry in anything and I'm not going to take it hard on you, we must to make it easier. I understand your message and as I said, I have a commitment to be neutral in Wikpipedia. Having also read your response to CoryGlee in the message above, I must acknowledge your responsible attitude and your commitment to wanting to improve. That's great! Best wishes to you and yours. Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind message, it just made my day feel a lot less stressed. Also, thank you for accepting my apology and thank you to the rest of the Wikipedia community for correcting my wrongs. Hope you and your relations are well. With many thanks and lots of kindness, Dan. Dantheanimator (talk) 02:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020 at Women in RedEdit

Women in Red

June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A kitten for you!Edit

I love kittens and I choose one to thank you for your cleaning-up of the Current Event sections. ^_^ (my favorite emoticon) ^_^ -- Cheers..

CoryGlee (talk) 13:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I also love kittens!! Thank you CoryGlee! Best regards ^_^!!! Alsoriano97 (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


Current eventsEdit

May I ask why you persistently keep removing clearly notable news items related to the United States on the current events portal?

For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_June_4&diff=960856093&oldid=960854261 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_June_4&diff=960755639&oldid=960752864 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_26&diff=prev&oldid=959159745 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_21&diff=prev&oldid=958187119 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_17&diff=prev&oldid=957238359 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_14&diff=prev&oldid=956712491 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_14&diff=prev&oldid=956700671 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_April_27&diff=prev&oldid=953505576

And there's probably way more. You do understand that the United States is a part of the international community, and international readers such as myself from the UK will be interested as to what is happening in the U.S., right? You don't seem to have a problem with stories from other countries, like the one on April 27 for example, about the court in Vietnam sending a Facebook user to prison, one could argue that does not qualify as "internationally notable", yet you did not remove this. You appear to have some sort of anti-Anglo bias going on here. Please try to be be more neutral in your editing. Local stories is one thing, but removing national stories from any country because you assume others won't be interested is unacceptable. GWA88 (talk) 08:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for you message and I'm going to clarify my editions. It's very simple. US is part of the international community and yes, and an important country, but this doesn't mean that any kind of national relevance new has to be named in the Current Events. Do an exercise, if instead of US, it was another country, would you add it?. I'm not sure. Also try to find out if the event has been broadcast by news portals and newspapers from other countries with another language. If yes (as in the case of the change of criteria of the University of California), Current Events is itssite. If it is something relevant, not if pure gossip or low impact news. It's easy: 2020 in the United States exists for some reason. I also tell you that if my edits were not undone, it is because I was probably not so wrong. I have sometimes erased news about the United States, the reason has been explained to me and I have admitted that I was wrong. So it is not that I have an anglophobia, but I realize that this world is no longer Anglo-centric and, therefore, neither is Current Events.Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
As far as I'm aware, the Current Events portal has never been "Anglo-centric", at least not in my six years of editing there. If you have proof of this so-called "Anglo-centrism" then please, feel free to provide it. As for whether or not I would add a domestic news story from another country, I do that all the time. I am interested in global affairs, not just news in the USA/UK. Go look through my User contributions, they speak for themself. Just please try and be a little more considerate when you edit the Current Events portal, as removing stories just because you assume it won't interest international readers is just ignorant. GWA88 (talk) 11:35, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Rosa Maria SardàEdit

 On 12 June 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rosa Maria Sardà, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Pau DonésEdit

 On 12 June 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Pau Donés, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 02:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020 at Women in RedEdit

Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ITN recognition for Chynybaĭ TursunbekovEdit

 On 9 July 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chynybaĭ Tursunbekov, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 06:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

2020Edit

You added Francisco Rodríguez Adrados today (practically no coverage outside Spain), and now you are edit-warring to remove a musician with coverage in nearly every continent of the world? Do you not see the problem here? Black Kite (talk) 16:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Are you able to see the number of non-English articles that Francisco have and not Tim. It's very easy. You may find that if someone has a lot of articles on wikipedia, it's for some reason. Alsoriano97 (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I agree (which is why I haven't removed Francisco) - but look at the worldwide coverage of Smith's death as well. Black Kite (talk) 18:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure "worldwide coverage" from non important and massive news portals is enough. Nothing from Spanish "El País", "El Mundo", "La Vanguardia", neither from French "Le Monde" or Italian "La Repubblica", or Greek and Russian ones. Only from those related to music and mostly are in English. Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:56, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
So you'd be OK with me removing those without large news portal links (which would of course include Adrados, and about half the people linked at 2020)? 21:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
No if those have more than 9 non-English articles on Wikipedia, a clear indicator of their relevance.Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Well I think you need to make up your mind then' are people more relevant because of their non-en articles, or because of their actual news coverage? Black Kite (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
It's very very simple: both. There are cases in which the death is covered by news from all over the world because they are well known or very important people (Hosni Mubarak, Ennio Morricone, Little Richard) while others do not have that impact on the news but as they are recognized in the field of their specialization or are relevant politicians despite being unknown outside (Landelino Lavilla, Nexhmije Hoxha, Edén Pastora) have more than 9 pages on Wikipedia. I have my mind very made up. Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
It might be worth looking at Cardiacs in other languages, though, rather than Smith. Black Kite (talk) 11:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Francisco Rodríguez AdradosEdit

 On 22 July 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Francisco Rodríguez Adrados, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020 at Women in RedEdit

Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)Edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from SS Britannic (1874) into Eleanor Roosevelt. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

I honestly appreciate that you let me know about it, because I did'nt know. I will consider it next time! I've changed the writing, perhaps it will not be necessary to add the template. If it's insufficient, please let me know. Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Pere CasaldàligaEdit

 On 10 August 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Pere Casaldàliga, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 10:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)