User talk:Alphachimp/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

== Re: WP:AIV ==

Hi! That cant be correct. See contribs by that IP. -- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK} 15:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, there seems to a bug in WP:ARV causing the problem. It happened to a previous IP I reported too. The tool seems to harvest the IP address from the URL. So in edit mode, the ?action=edit tag seems to get added.-- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK} 15:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.:) -- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK} 15:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Germen

Thank you, Alpha. He's been a disruptive user for a long time. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

If an admin breaks the 3rr rule will the admin be punished or are admins allowed a greater number of reverts maybe 4 5 6 7 8 ?

Hello

Do admins have the right to revert more then non-admins?

I just reported an admin for breaking the 3rr but I am not certain that he did break it if he is allowed more reverts.

Ramand 18:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

In regards to the bottage

Now that you're back would you be able to do that bot request possibly? If you can't it's no problem but a lot of links still need changing. --- Lid 09:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Long-Overdue RfA Thanks

So, when can I be expecting the RfA (it's after August 15 ;))? Have a great senior year (don't let the college thing get too stressful). alphaChimp ^laudare 05:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the well wishes for my senior year, and I'm sure you'll do fine with the RfA tools. About a future RfA, see User:Tariqabjotu/Rationale. -- tariqabjotu 09:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

More congrats

My usual PILE-ON CONGRATS! Good luck with the tools, you'll be a great admin, dude. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 13:41, 3 September 2006 (UTC) lol oops already congrat'd you in your archive - it's been so long I forgot ;) My bad, well congrats again & welcome back. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 13:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

A well-deserved congrats. I believe we have chosen... wisely... ;) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 01:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem

Your adminship seemed long-overdue anyway. --CFIF ☎ ⋐ 01:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

Thanks for the Bday statement :D °≈§→ Robomæyhem: T/←§≈° 01:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

You are welcome

Your welcome Alpha it was a long time coming! Nice thankyou images BTW Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 05:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

You should have droped me a line lol I can do a good amount with HTML. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 05:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. I see you used Blnguyen's image, lol. Michael 05:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

You're very welcome. You deserve it; if I didn't nominate you, someone obviously would've. :) -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 06:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Haha, love the image. Long overdue congratulations, I guess! I hope you make a wise ape administrator. — riana_dzasta _{wreak havoc|damage report} 07:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Something scary for you...

5 minutes of my dodgy paint skills and a bit of a hangover, and this is what you get. — riana_dzasta _{wreak havoc|damage report} 07:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

A belated congratulations, and you're very welcome! --Merovingian - Talk 01:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Congrats and have fun with the tools! Love all the party monkeys! -- Samir धर्म 02:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks :)

Hehe, I don't think Nick told you - I have an odd, unreasonable fear of monkies. Not chimpanzees or apes or gorillas, just monkies. And spiders and ants and cockroaches and snakes.... So really it's more Nick taking care of me. I just cook. He (and my little sister, when he's not around) has to kill everything.

My RFA is a ways off; I'm waiting until at least October.

I've seen you around experimenting with the tools; you're doing great!!! My support was obviously well-deserved. You completely deserve the mop and flamethrower.

Thanks for the very nice thank you; I hope to see you around even more now! :) Srose (talk) 15:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for marketing my monkey and my photography. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

lazydork

You deleted my artical on lazydork , as far as i could tell i did not breach any rules , Please explain which rule i broke and i will fix it

98smithg298smithg2 . forgot to sign it :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98smithg2 (talk • contribs)

Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

No problem,with so much experience I know you'll do great.congratulations SOADLuver 02:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations Alphachimp! And thanks for taking the trouble to send out so many messages - I can see you are well suited to the mop ;-) Stephen B Streater 08:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome

I wouldn't support your adminship, if I hadn't thought you were suitable. Congratulations, and thanks for the nice thank you note. Thanks for taking on the extra responsibility that adminship entails as well. User:Pedant 02:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

By the way, you complimented the photo on my user page... to which were you referring? User:Pedant 17:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Hero Clothing

May I ask why you sent in Hero Clothing for deletion?

Hero Clothing myspace

I just wanted to let you know that I deleted the myspace page link from the profile.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am Jack

Just delete it already! Can't believe G7 was declined... - CrazyRussian talk/email 03:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

No probs -- Samir धर्म 04:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Belated thanks

Sorry for the delay - I've been sort of busy lately in real-life - but thanks a lot for your support in my recent RfA! I'll be sure to watch what I do, and I'll definitely ask if I have any questions. Again, thanks a million! Larry V (talk | contribs) 04:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of e-Choupal article

The article is being expanded by me to explain the details of the project - its background, principles, its impact and the future plans. It is not about the company or its products. This project ITC e-Choupal has won several international awards - Stockholm Challenge 2006, Development Gateway Award 2005, ICC-UNDP Award 2004 for working for development goals. Reqeust you to recreate the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajasekhar.vv (talk • contribs)

Thanks and congratulations

Many thanks for all of your help with the bot assisted categorisation of Category:Architects, and congratulations on your RFA. --Mcginnly | Natter 08:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Winhunter's RfA thanks

Hi Alphachimp, thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which was closed as successful today with a finaly tally of (56/0/3). I will be very careful at first to avoid any mistakes. Please feel free to leave a message in my talk page if you have any comments/suggestions about me in the future. Once again, thank you! --WinHunter (talk) 09:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

new idea

Please comment here.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 12:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Belated congratulations

...for your belated thanks. :-) Good luck! Jayjg ^(talk) 18:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Suggesting Speedy Deletion

you told me to use an appropiate tag, is db-noconext ok? please let me know :)

Samkxu 02:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

For your kind comments and suggestion re WP:RFB. I have since been contacted by someone else supporting that, and I would stand, but wonder if my RfA was a little too recent at the moment (8 July). Your advice welcome. Tyrenius 02:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Belated congrats from the Cactus

Some supplies for the road ahead :-)

Well done Alpha, good luck wielding the mop and bucket. I know you'll do well, but here's some goodies to keep a good chimp happy in the long days ahead ... --Cactus.man ✍ 12:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

JPD's RfA

Thanks, AlphaChimp, for your support at my RfA, which finished with a tally of 94/1/0. I hope I live up to the Blnguyen's judgment, and the confidence you have shown in me as a result, in my activities as an administrator. JPD (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:AWB

Yeah, I tried it this morning and it said I wasn't authorized for some reason. It's working now, thanks. :-) theProject 16:53, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

LOL!

I am so going to 3RR you before me. :P Yanksox 17:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk Page

Hi, I just wanted to let you know I loved your talk page so much, well....I kinda borrowed it. If that is an issue, please let me know and I will change it. - Kaobear 22:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

IP Block

I wouldn't be overly concerned about being too harsh on this IP. He's been using a multitude of sock puppets and proxies to push this content on to that article for over a month.--Crossmr 01:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I was just looking at this issue and the extensive block history of this address. If you don't want to, I don't mind blocking it for the original three months with a request for their network administrator to contact me concerning getting it unblocked. --Zsinj^Talk 01:49, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

If there is any hope getting this individual contained I'm sure myself and Eskog would appreciate and support any action to that effect.--Crossmr 01:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Zac watson

You are correct! Either that's changed sometime in the past year, or my memory is failing me. Either way, thanks for pointing it out. Cheers! --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 02:05, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Saw you were redoing your page

Hey Alpha. check my alt. account I used your page as a template for it if you wish to restore your old page. Link is on my main page. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 02:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

No prb thought abot redoing my page like that. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 02:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Bot

Discussion which might interest you.[1] Tyrenius 03:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 5th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 36	5 September 2006	About the Signpost

Everyking desysopped	Explicit images spark debate
Report from the Italian Wikipedia	The English Wikipedia reaches 1,000 administrators
Voting begins in Board elections	Wikipedia in the news
News and notes	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Help with reverting and redirecting

Hello, I was wondering if you could help me? I've been on wikipedia for a bit but I'm still learning my way around.

I've been bumbling along trying to improve and expand some of the Elder Scrolls stubs and articles, but somebody has deleted the Porphyric hemophilia article and redirected the page to Porphyria; their logic being that since Porphyric Hemophilia redirects (with a capital H) this one should too. The problem is that the article is about the Elder Scrolls universe and has no relation to the real world disease.

So, I was wondering how do you revert something like this? Actually, I've yet to work out how to revert anything at all. *scratches head* Also, how would I go about moving this article to a different page with a (Game) or (Elder Scrolls) bit in the title so that this doesn't happen again?

Yours sincerly, Morgrim 07:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

User evading block

I'm not sure how or where to report this but, you blocked LUCPOL (talk · contribs), and it appears he may be using a sockpuppet Hans Schwarc (talk · contribs). I wouldn't usually make this accusation, but this user only edits articles in which Lucpol is involved in edit was on, and always shows up when Lucpol needs a different user to advance the same agenda. --Wildnox 13:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for looking into this :) --Wildnox 16:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

User name problem

Looks like we have a vandal account at User Bitch123. Only edits are, of course, vandalism. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 15:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• • Heck, that didn't take long. :) - Lucky 6.9 15:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Just curious?

Whats the prob with Muneycashhoz? - Glen 01:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT

I've speedy approved tasks 6 and 7. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Our "policy" is in serious need of some work ;) I've speedy approved based on these being tasks that already have community approval for bots, you being an experienced bot operator, and your use of tested and trusted software. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment

Excuse me...

But for what reason do you keep deleting the Super l33t login that I made? If there is something in it that offends anyone or goes against any rules can you tell me so I can take them out and put it back up? I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Superl33t (talk • contribs) 01:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh alright that's fine. Will you unblock it so that I may put it back up and take the video off? I didn't realize that putting the video link on there was advertising. My apologies. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Superl33t (talk • contribs) 01:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

John Folse

Am I missing something on the speedy/protection for John Folse? He is a fairly well-known chef in South Louisiana. I realize the article looks like all promo or copyvio, but would it bother you if I was able to write a noncopyvio article with external sources? Thanks, NawlinWiki 02:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! We love our Cajun chefs down here. :) NawlinWiki 05:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Real vandal - User:Egr

See: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. This is vandalism from Egr. Or what? LUCPOL 19:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I can also give up cancelling his answers, but please stay alert, AlphaChimp. He's continuing to slander and provoke me. The accuses against me of vandalism are completely false, I'm trying to improve the grammar for the article Rapcore, but he and his sockpuppets (John Amber, SZPANER, Hans Schwarc) continue to destroy my edits and not contribute seriously to the article. -- Egr (talk), 21:17, 7 September 2006

A followup to LUCPOL

After LUCPOL and his SOCK returned from their ban, they(LUCPOL and his other SOCKs) started crossposting about supposed vandalism and sockpuppetry by Egr. I submitted and request for checkuser on LUCPOL and his possible SOCKs and took no other real actions other than talk messages. Did I take a proper course of action? --Wildnox 23:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Collij

Thanks for the kind words-- I try not to spend too much time on wiki, but somehow, even in the middle of classes or while talking with friends, I wonder what's going on on my watchlist, or who's up for RfA. It's a terrible addiction ; ) AdamBiswanger1_{R.I.P. Steve Irwin} 02:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Pittsburgh

Thank you for changing many of the links from [[Pittsburgh]] to [[Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania|Pittsburgh]]. I see that many articles still link to [[Pittsburgh]]. Would you mind changing the rest of those as well? Thanks. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 03:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Polls:

Hi. I'm just sending out a message for a new study I will be undertaking soon. It will involve surveys & polls to gather information & trends of editors on Wikipedia & other subjects. The data gathering will involve yourself recieving a questionaire on your talk page for you to fill out. I will then collect your questionaire & combine it with data from other editors. If you would like to be a part of this experiment, or know of someone who does, place a "Yes" or "No" below this message. Remember, it's only for fun & you can choose not to fill out all or parts of your questionaire once they arrive. Have a nice day... -- Spawn Man 06:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC). Congrats on your long over-due RFA.

Yes. alphaChimp^(talk) 14:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Great! As soon as I get enough people, I'll send out a questionaire. Thanks! Spawn Man 22:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Your behaviour

Your behaviour is bad. Your is administrator, it does not fall out to write [8]. You should to put to shame :( LUCPOL 16:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Do you feel better offending different? Why was such bad person administrator? You are brute. It is not possible with you accesses to agreement, nor to ask you about nothing. It it only what was it been possible was from you to hear then insult. Why? Why do oneself you keep so? LUCPOL 16:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the quick action on the Bollywood linkspammer. Zora 19:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Would you mind....

adding a block to this IP please 211.180.116.205 . It's exactly the same M.O. as one you blocked earlier 211.208.174.16 and this one 211.35.243.137 blocked by User:Mets501. All three have added racist abuse to WTGDMan1986. Cheers if you caould take 2 mins please. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 20:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Untitled Entry

Hello, Gost you guys were quick to delete my monopole stub! No problem, I'm working on getting a picture for the folded unipole antenna entry. LymanSchool 20:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot

Hi, alphachimp! I just wanted to say "Thank You" for helping me with the Lisa Gleave vandal. Thanks for blocking his IPs and for protecting the article so he doesn't vandalise it again using another IP! --Esteban F. ^(contribs) 23:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Why did you delete?

Hi, i'm just curious as to why you deleted my article on Telephone Jim Jesus. I can't think of any reason why it merited deletion...i mean, it's not like the guy is a total unknow. I tried to write the article the correct way. I dunno. I'm new here, but i don't think it should have been deleted. Could you at least let me know why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shnakepup (talk • contribs) 05:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Essjay Blocked

You apparently recently blocked a vandal from making changes. Now you have locked me out as well. Apparently you blocked a proxy for a huge amount of users. Please unblock the proxy and find an alternative blocking method.

Thanks. Essjay. Essjay ^Talk 07:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.2.236.216 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

UNBLOCK MY IP NOW PLEASE

Or I will file a administration revocaton request.

Essjay. Essjay ^Talk 07:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.2.236.216 (talk • contribs) 11:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

At the risk of being blocked by a bureaucrat, this user is using a sig that looks like a copy of xaosflux's with the letters changed. It's not Essjay's sig, and it seems like a bureaucrat

1. Could get around such a block
2. Could undo admin blocks
3. Would not threaten administrative revocation for something done in good faith
4. Would give you more than four minutes before the threat
5. Would realize when you haven't been here for six hours and can't respond

-- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

In fact, it turns out it's an IP I was tracking for performing knowledgeable vandalism to Hillary Rodham Clinton three minutes prior. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Lol. No worries. He won't get unblocked (Essjay could just unblock himself). Thanks for the posts Omicron alphaChimp^(talk) 11:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually I just spoke with Essjay and he is really upset that we have not unblocked him yet. For whatever reason he is behind some sort of proxy that will not allow him to make those changes. You better unblock him. Its the real deal.-- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.2.236.216 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Ever notice how it's always the bad grammar that gives away phishing schemes? (Sorry for the unnecessary message banner; I just thought this was amusing.) -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Alpha Phi Alpha vandal

An admin placed a semi protect on the page so that new or anonymous users could not edit the page, so the vandal created user ID NinjaNubian. He has begun vandalzing the page again. I have sent him the first warning level. Can you pls monitor and block his ID if he persist. You can review his talk page to see that other contributors have complained to him about vandalizing other pages. thanks for you help. Ccson 13:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The same user is vandalizing the article again. He insists on changing words and sentences that promote his own POV. These words and sentences have survived a peer review and Featured Article review. He's accusing me of vandalizing by restoring the information I orginally added. Please review and ask him to stop changing the work of other editors. Ccson 06:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm not referring to the content discussion on the talk page. He questions the word "swiftly" being used and wants to "later". He doesn't like the sentence "Alpha men were pioneers", because he disagrees that if they are pioneers. I supplied the reference which indicates Alpha men were vanguards (pioneers) and so he continues to change. This word and sentence has been in this article for over 6 months. Ccson 06:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Also, the references he provided conveniently only addresses the issues in this article. He changes the web site and then says its a valid source. We had a resolution discussion back in fall 2005, and that admin determined that the site was unreliable because it changed daily to counter any valid discussions that were oppostie of his. Ccson 06:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

He just made the 3rd vandalism within 24 hours. Ccson 06:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lollirot

I have noticed when you closed the above AfD, you did not remove the category template, "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD". By deleting this when closing it pulls the discussion out of the category. I have deleted it from this discussion, but if you could review any other closures you have done recently and remove the tag from them it would be greatly appreicated. Thanks. --Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Um...I removed it... alphaChimp^(talk) 17:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I have no idea what happened there. I was advising a number of closers about the template as I was coming across them. Please accept my appology.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 18:52, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

"American University 12/13/70"

Hi,

Why did you delete my article on "American University 12/13/70"?

Thanks,
   Dragan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dragan00000 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Alpha, I'm restoring this article. It appears to be an album that was released by the Allman Brothers. I'll presume you like the Doobies better. ;) Yanksox 17:02, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

You need to get in better touch with your 70's/80's Sothern Rock/Smooth Music (The Doobie Brothers, Allman Brothers). Though, I admit, I've been listening to alot of metalcore lately. :P Yanksox 17:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Lol, I just listen to alot of music when I do pretty much anything. I'm kind of sad. :P Yanksox 17:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Just to let you know that I have already responded to the question you have asked me on my RfA. Even though I seem to be getting some good support so far, I would be interested to hear your opinion, but feel free not to comment on my RfA if you don't want to. Cheers.--Konstable 22:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Hutton Cranswick United

Thank you for closing this AfD. For tidyness, I wonder if you would delete the redirect page Hutton Cranswick United as well, please? BlueValour 01:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Covenat 3rr

What's missing?--The Judge 02:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

clarification request

which part do you need clarification for -- the first or second?

Justforasecond 05:22, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Favor++

Merge Andrew Brown (baseball player) into Andrew Brown. Thx - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, but please undelete the last two revisions before the cut-n-paste by the same user for fairness sake. - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

RFCU result on LUCPOL

The request for checkuser on LUCPOL was fullfilled. Mackensen confirmed that all the accounts were on the same IP and were the same person[9], except for the IP that was listed. Also on a side note the checkuser on egr concluded that he and the other users were all innocent of sockpuppetry. Thank you for your help with this problem. --Wildnox 15:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Sept. 9th, 2006 Subway Changes

I guess you can remove the semi-protections from the articles vandalized with Sept. 9th, 2006 subway changes. But we should still keep a eye out, just in case the I.P. users try to do it again, along with using a different date. --Imdanumber1 ( Talk | contribs) 23:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Wow

That was a really fast deletion, kudos. –– Lid^(Talk) 01:11, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh yeah, List of professional wrestling throws was moved to Professional wrestling throws, to bring it in line with all the other pages, so I was wondering if you could do a script to automatically change the old links of [[Professional wrestling throws|*]] to [[Professional wrestling throws|*]] and [[Professional wrestling throws#*]] to [[Professional wrestling throws#*]]? –– Lid^(Talk) 01:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks and I see you've discovered my recent hassles with banned user JB196? –– Lid^(Talk) 01:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

chris rodler

Hello,

I am attempting to create an article about the musician Chris Rodler, but it says you delete it. I was just wondering why. If the extremely obscure wrestler Julio Fantastico can have an entry, why can't Chris Rodler who is on several albums?

Please let me know what I must do in order to create an article.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiawa77 (talk • contribs)

Comment allows archiving. alphaChimp^(talk) 01:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Chris Rodler again

"Comment allows archiving"

I don't understand what this means. He is on par with other folks who have articles; I'm just trying to contribute. What does your comment mean, and what do I need to do to create an article without having it immediately deleted? Kiawa77 01:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)kiawa77

207.200.116.8 user vandalizing my website?

Hello, I just started up a website called, www.supportgore.org, which has a form in which people can pledge their vote to Al Gore if he chooses to run in 2008. I built this site myself, but consider myself very inexperienced with programming, etc. I noticed that there was one person so far on the pledge list that had an offensive comment, so I looked at the IP address in my database, and then noticed that the same IP address appeared 4 different times in the list. I did a google search and found this, much to my unpleasant surprise. Do you have any suggestions of what I can do? Please respond to: supportgore@gmail.com. Thank You. ~Craig.

I'm so confused. What are you talking about? alphaChimp^(talk) 02:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm assuming that an IP vandalised his public form list, and the IP has editted on wikipedia as well. –– Lid^(Talk) 02:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Ah, ok. A lot of IPs are shared. You really know as much as I do about it. Sorry. alphaChimp^(talk) 03:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments well appreciated

Thank you for the fond farewell on 4 September. I have addressed it at my user talk page and furtherly disclosed information there. Also, it was my pleasure to vote in your favor for the RfA. Thank you, again. — ^{`</sup>CRAZY`(lN)`SANE<sup>` [discl.]} 03:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Bearly541

Please take a look at this user. On the Alpha Phi Alpha and the kappa alpha psi pages, he has a history of reverting documented edits such as here for no valid reason. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kappa_Alpha_Psi&diff=75056898&oldid=75050135 He claims vandalism when it is a spelling error and does reverts rather than revises. References were provided. In a section where other fraternities were discussed thoroughly a reference and thorough sentence was provided. User did a wholesale revert back 5 major edits. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=75056228&oldid=75056120 . He has made personal attacks in talk pages and invalid arguments. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAlpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=74012643&oldid=73612624 NinjaNubian 08:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism by Bearly541

Bearly541 has again reverted to his own version even with proper references given [10]. He continues to vandalize in an unnecessary manner. [11] NinjaNubian 15:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

1st poll:

Hi everyone! This is the 1st ever poll to be sent out. Please read the Disclaimer below & enjoy! -- Spawn Man 05:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Poll 1 - Wikipedian relationships

• Question 1: Do you feel that other Wikipedians are as nice (or as horrible!) as when you started editing Wikipedia as a registered user?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Roughly about the same. D)Don't know. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 2: If you answered "No" above, how have other Wikipedian's attitudes changed?
  • A)They have grown nicer. B)They have grown meaner. C)Don't know. D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.

• Question 3: Are admins as nice as you think they should be? If you're an admin, try to be truthful...
  • A)Yes. B)No, they are nicer. C)No, they are meaner/grumpier. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 4: Have you ever been in a serious dispute on Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No, I've never been in a dispute. C)No, I've only been in minor disputes. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 5: Have you ever been blocked from editing Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Not sure. (You can find out by checking "My contributions" & selecting "block log"). D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.

• Question 6: Have you ever met another editor on Wikipedia in real life?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Not sure. D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.

• Question 7: Do you enjoy communicating or working with other editors on Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 8: Have you ever taken a "Wikibreak" due to stress from other editors?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)No, I've only taken a "Wikibreak" due to un-editor related stress. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 9: Have you ever collaborated on an article with another editor on Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Several times. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 10: Do you envy other editors on Wikipedia for their achievements or good fortune? Be honest...
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)I don't know. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

Disclaimer

Hi everyone. If this is your first time filling out a survey, read this. To fill out a questionaire sheet, simply send me a post to my talk page, clearly stating your choice for each answer. For example: For Question 1, you might choose to place on the message, "Q1: A)" or "Question 1: Choice A." etc etc. It's up to you, as long as I get the general jist of what your choices are. You have around 1 week to return a survey sheet, but late entrie's will be accepted.

Remember however, your personal choices may be read whilst they are on my talk page. I will understand if you don't wish to answer some or all of the survey due to this. For this reason I have also placed an "Abstain" choice for each question. Try & answer truthfully, or don't answer at all if you can't.

However, your personal choices will not be expressed on the survey's outcome, instead it will be part of a larger finding, such as "60% of people eat chocolate, 25% never eat chocolate & 5% of people chose to abstain from answering..." I will never say, "90% of people eat chocolate, while only Fruityman said he didn't..." This would be an invasion of privacy. However, if a question has (Please explain) or (Please elaborate) as a choice, your specific answer may be used in the survey outcome, although your name will not be. If a question does not have (Please explain) as a question choice, but your intended choice is not represented on the choice list, then feel free to provide another choice which fits your description.

You're probably getting bored reading all of this so I'll wrap up. To see outcomes of the results, see my Polls subpage. Feel free to comment on anything! Feedback is always welcome. Most importantly, have fun. Topics will vary greatly & surveys may be resent out at later times to re-assess a consensus if survey numbers have grown significantly. If you know anyone who would be interested in these surveys, send them to my talk page or if you see this survey sheet, send your own answers in! Thanks. -- Spawn Man.

Favor ++

Move Vipava, Slovenija to Vipava, Slovenia over what's there now. Thx. - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

NinjaNubian

Yet another person Vandalizing the Alpha Phi Alpha entry. As a new Wiki user, how do you police such activity? In trying to talk to the guy, all you get is nonsense back, with citiations to clearly biased material, including several Tripod pages. He's even gone so far as to tag himself as a member of Alpha Phi Alpha on his page. His above "complaints" above are retaliation for wiki users editing out his vandalism. Robotam16:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

OK, just noted NinjaNubian was already noted above as a serial vandal. Robotam16:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Zero

I deleted Chapter Zero because my reading of the article concurred with the statements on the AfD debate; namely, that the company is - at this time - not sufficiently notable for an article. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, though. DS 22:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

What is done about wikistalking?

I'm being wikistalked by JB196, [12] being the most recent case. What is the usual response to wikistalking? –– Lid^(Talk) 00:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I see he tried to blank this comment repeatedly as well. –– Lid^(Talk) 02:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Good Call

I see you blocked the IP of C 1 4 u. And because of it the autoblock confrimed her sock puppet (TV Lover) Thanks and great job! Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 04:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh I will that is the thrid one of hers that I have caught. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 04:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Ha ha

I was just about to leave you a message commenting on your fine New Pages Patrolling form, when I got the little "You have a new message on your talk page!" alert. And who should be leaving me a message but you!

I am amused.

Anyways, keep up the good work.

All the best,
Ξxtreme Unction|_{yakkity yak}
04:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 11th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 37	11 September 2006	About the Signpost

Carnildo resysopped	Report from the Hungarian Wikipedia
News and notes	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Kudos

Thanks for this on behalf of me and some people in IRC! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

CCson

Has already made 4 major reverts without valid reason or mediation. All references have been provided. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=75081404&oldid=75067094 , http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=75039650&oldid=74944082 , and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=75050202&oldid=75048460 .

and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=75050202&oldid=75049269 NinjaNubian 17:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

NN block

You beat me to blocking NN by about 10 seconds... anyway, you may have noted that I warned Ccson. If you think it appropriate to turn that into a block for aesthetic reasons of symmetry, please do William M. Connolley 21:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

It would only be fair to block them both. They both were in violation of the 3rr rule. In fact CCson reverted 4 times in 24 hours. 68.175.26.54 00:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

• AlphaChimp, how can you block CCSon, if he created the Alpha Phi Alpha page? Also, the user above is a sock puppet of Ninja Nubian. Bearly541 02:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • You and William were discussing whether to block CC and me because we violated 3RR. But, NinjaNubian was constantly ruining the FA article Alpha Phi Alpha and Kappa Alpha Psi. Bearly541 02:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Sorry, too much drama for me on wiki today. Bearly541 03:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

All you have to do is read the edits, and the talk section. Then you'll see whom is doing what. I find it extremely unfair that CCson wasn't blocked for several hours as well. This was the second time he has 3rr in under a month. NinjaNubian 17:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

NinjaNubian is now using Mykungfu as an additional ID. Robotam 13:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Symetrical Blocking

I find it extremely unfair that CCson wasn't blocked for several hours as well. This was the second time he has 3rr in under a month. He simply was warned. He refuses to discuss in the talk section. NinjaNubian 17:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

CCson

Has already made 4 major reverts without valid reason or mediation. All references have been provided. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=75081404&oldid=75067094 , http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=75039650&oldid=74944082 , and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=75050202&oldid=75048460 .

and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&diff=75050202&oldid=75049269 NinjaNubian 17:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about the confusion...

Alphachimp,
I posted earlier about a potential hacker on my website. He has only posted one negative comment on my pledge list, but has also done a few other pledges on my list, some with positive comments. The reason I am writing to you is because the ip address is 207.200.116.8, which was supposedly involved in a major attack on wikipedia, which you were supposedly the main reverter of this attack. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mboverload/vandalattack

All right, I am definitely a newbie when it comes to computers, websites, and programming. There was something mentioned on my previous post about this being a shared IP address? Does that mean it is probably not the same guy? It seems fishy to me that this same IP address is posting multipule pledges with nice and naughty comments. I just don't want this person (if it is the same one that sabotaged wikipedia) to do the same to my website.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
~Craig. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.178.97.8 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

AWB

Hi, you approved me to use AWB. Thanks! However, I am having trouble getting it to work. I get the error message "You are not enabled to use this." Do you have any ideas of what could be causing the problem? (I have not gotten a response on the AWB talk page, the computing reference desk, or the Village Pump.) --Ginkgo100 ^{talk · e@} 20:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat!

File:Ireland 37 bg 061402.jpg

Hi there betaMonkey alphaChimp!

Thank you so much for supporting my RfA! It ended up passing and I'm rather humbled by the support (and a bit surprised that it was snowballed a day early!). Please let me know if I can help you out and I welcome any comments, questions, or advice you wish to share.

Sláinte!

P.S. Thanks for the question on my RfA and I'd definitely like to collaborate with you on the CP backlog in the near future!

hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 02:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Nathaniel Wenger

I was curious to find out why the page i created for myself got deleted from wikipedia free encyclopedia. I have created two pages in the past about myself and one i erased while the other was erased from the search engine. I was curious what was the problem with my article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nate4u2rite (talk • contribs)

Timestamp. alphaChimp^(talk) 02:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Is this linkspam

Hello. It looks like you are currently active and I have an "admin question". This [13] looks to me like linkspam. Am I within bounds to warn the user and revert all the edits with VandalProof? or would you recommend a different course of action? Thanks --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting all those pages, I had noticed it but was too lazy to fix it myself. --Alcuin 03:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Wow. Thanks for that. Is that something that you have that is better than VandalProof? or is it just a "mop"? I did go and tag the user with {{blatantspam}}. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

page view help

I also posted this on my talk page ...

I am having technical issues with Covington Township, Michigan and similar pages.

1) I cannot click on the links in the Communities section 2) There are vertical lines where the geographical coordinates are || ||, and the text is unreadable.

I tried to remove the coordinates templates, and that solved the problem, but another user has restored them, and the problem has returned.

I also have a similar problem when trying to view other pages - I get more lines like //, which makes the text unreadable.

How do I fix this? Aeh4543 08:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

You told me I could

Just popping in to remind you about the possible botting. On a completely unrelated topic how long did it take you to become an admin? I know it is very off topic but I am a curious person. –– Lid^(Talk) 10:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Undelete the Floetics

please undelete the floetics because im creating it to help my friends.. please help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blayziebone (talk • contribs)

Timestamp. alphaChimp^(talk) 16:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

my page

why do you keep deleting my page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amonsefan (talk • contribs)

Timestamp. alphaChimp^(talk) 16:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Redirect for Emily Perry (English actress)

Hello AC - I've made a mistake and moved an article from Emily Perry (English actress) to Emily Perry (actress). Upon checking for double redirects, I found another article, Emily Perry, for a different Australian actress. Obviously, I've mucked things up. Could you please delete my erroneous redirect and move the new Emily Perry (actress) article back to Emily Perry (English actress). I would just repost the article there, but I can't do a history merge and I know it's important to keep that. Really, really sorry for the inconvenience. After you have fixed my screw up, I will create a proper disambiguation page at Emily Perry (actress), which is what I should have done in the first place. Again, sorry, and thanks. --Satori Son 17:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

• Perfect - thanks a million! --Satori Son 19:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my editor review!!! :) Somebody from the same RFA mentioned vandalized my userpage earlier in the (UTC) day. It's getting a bit out of hand, needless to say. I made one comment; I hope the nominator isn't getting too much trouble... Srose (talk) 19:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

AFD

You added this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knights of Noblemen to the AFD log for today. Any reason? I couldn't work out what you intended (since the article is already deleted) so I've removed it. Cheers, Yomangani^talk 01:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, how disappointing, I thought it may have been some Strange Admin Magic^TM that I didn't know about. Yomangani^talk 01:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the 'move' tip. P g chris 01:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Floetics

please undelete this article. I know it deleted because of short or few words but i have now long article. thanks... please undelete... --Blayziebone 12:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

WP.CSD G1 - my page

I understand why Wikipedia would want to delete pages that are vandalism or whatever the reason may be. However, I am creating a page for myself for family and friends to view. The extended family I have around the world would love to see something like this. Also, I have every right to create something purely for entertainment and connectability. I would appreciate it if you could leave my page alone and let me go about my business. Keep an eye on the page if you like but their wont be any vandalism or slander or indecent material. Besides, you have pages related to Nazi's, Porn, and Violence. That alone is hate, sex, and crime put out their on the internet for everybody to see. My page will only be viewed by family.

Tx. for your time.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Amonsefan (talk • contribs)

Timestamp alphaChimp^(talk) 15:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank You for letting me know, and I apologize for any vandalism that I may have caused. Sorry to have caused trouble.

justin150

MORE Subway Changes

These subway vandals are back. A new IP user has vandalized the B and D articles. This is starting to get dumb. Can you do something about them? --Imdanumber1 ( Talk | contribs) 22:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Your call

Your call as to what to do next. I don't have the whatsits to apply CSD a7 while the AfD notice is still up. Bobo. 03:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Alphachimp said: Eh, whatever. I just deleted it.

End result is the same whatever happens, I guess. That's the most important thing. Thanks for getting to the deletion. Bobo. 03:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Just saw the bot edits on my watchlist, thanks very much for that. –– Lid^(Talk) 04:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Interpromotional Organization Wrestling Federation (IOWF)

Alphachimp,

I'm writing in regards to the deletion notice I found on the page I created and have a question about it.

What type of scale are you using to determine the organization's notoriety?

Calling it "entirely non-notable" is highly inaccurate. There are hundreds of people in the city of Louisville as well as other parts of the state of Kentucky and Indiana that would disagree with that.

I'm not in 100% comprehension of the Wikipedia's policies so I cannot efficiently dispute the claim that this page "fails WP:ORG, WP:V, and WP:NOR". If we can come to an understanding on our notoriety dispute, is there a way I can edit the page to meet the criteria of the policies noted?

Thank you for your time.

~Oldschoolfan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldschoolfan (talk • contribs) 15:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Removal of biased category: LGBT rights opposition

How can this category be removed? There has been a discussion with an overwhelming consensus that it is politically biased. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:LGBT_rights_opposition#Delete_this_Bias_Category ~Kruck 18:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Hope I am in the right place

Please tell me why the Munier page was deleted?

Howard L. Rehs 23:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

I'd love to know why you deleted the Knose article, being that it actually exists, has had a debut in performance at a public art reception for the Maryland Institute College of Art and it's page will soon be graced with a picture.

I can understand your deletion of the article wench, even though i still intend upong making a serious article about the word wench.

-Moforex

Regarding your bot and replacing templates.

Hey, I'm somewhat new to Wikipedia. One thing I have noticed though is that when I place warning templates on people's talk pages, some bots often replace the templates with the actual words. Yours has done this (as can be seen here). I don't have a problem with this in the slightest, I was just curious as to why people's bots would actually change the template when it is fine as it is? Thanks for your help, and sorry for taking up your time - The Haunted Angel 00:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Potential Rollback?

Linkspam by User:Cyndisource --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 00:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem, I can get it. Thanks --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 00:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the additional note. After further inspection, I didn't revert all the edits, but did revert all of the ones where official links were removed. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 01:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

???

last few times i said soething about his suspension sum itios keeps erasing it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.86.74.183 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 16 September 2006

List of major opera composers

Several users got into a move war over this article. Unfortunately, when the WP database went down at around 4:00 p.m. EST, the original talk page became orphaned from the article. It had a rather long detailed talk page, which I cannot find, although the article itself is still there. Can you help? Marc Shepherd 00:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I figured it out. The edit war involved these four names:

• List of major opera composers
• List of opera composers considered major
• List of opera composers of Operas
• List of composers of opera
• List of composer of opera

While I was writing this, I see that User:EurekaLott has repaired it. Marc Shepherd 01:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Cyndi Lauper info

I updated the links in the singles section because most are no longer available. I assumed that Wikipedia would like links that workd and had information. This was not spam I was trying to correct errors —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyndisource (talk • contribs) 04:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

i'm not

i'm not experimenting, i can't speak english well so it's difficult to me to explain clearly. indonesia was founder of non-aligment movement (id:Gerakan Nonblok) since 1961. that's mean indonesia was not in the western/US side by the time of 1980. -someonewhocan'tspeakinenglish --219.83.2.48 09:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)-

Konstable's RfA thanks

Hi Alphachimp, thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which was closed as successful last Wednesday with a unanimous support of (47/0/0). I will do my best to help keep Wikipedia clean, green and vandal free. Once again, thank you! --Konstable 14:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Thanks for the picture, I see that you are an admin, make me an admin so that I can block everyone :D Pinkbluty 17:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Chimpy

I was wondering if you have a page where you can showcase or have a gallery of all your pictures of the yellow chimp. I would be really interested in seeing it. Thanks! huntersquid 17:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Random Block

I do not understand why you blocked me yesterday as I quite clearly said that I was not going to let it run nor was I using that as a "threat or leverage" yet you still block me for "making a threat on wikipedia." I have not, and will not, vandalize wikipedia anymore. I have had my fun and now I want to fix the very megar and highly wrong U-boat section. Just from a quick glance the stats for some of the boats are way way off and the history of the u-boat misses almost all of the key points. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.227.97.25 (talk • contribs)

Just a note, that same IP left me a message an hour and a half earlier [14]. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 01:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Belated thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA. Consensus to promote was reached, and I am now an administrator. I'll be using the tools cautiously at first, and everyone should feel welcome to peer over my shoulder and make sure I'm not doing anything foolish. --Robth^Talk 03:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

undelete the floetics (SIGNED)

please return my article because i want to help my friends to be popular thanks.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blayziebone (talk • contribs)

J150

Thank You for letting me know, and I apologize for any vandalism that I may have caused. Sorry to have caused trouble.

justin150

Render Deletion

You recently deleted a artical named Render - Fuji Co. My reasons for having this page up are 1. so that render fans my use it to check dates and times of up coming concerts and 2. because only render fans and members would ever see it so it would be out of sight and mind... plz comply - Fuji...

p.s. this is not a whole bunch of junk to add to wikipedia, just so you know that im not trying to spam you or anything... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fujitakeout (talk • contribs)

hello

hello Alpha Chimp

What I'm trying to do is get rid of the false information that somebody has placed in this article so if you could check the last changes before mine you will find the culprit who changed this article with no apparent reason other than to destroy the information or simply for his or her own amusement thank you very much

P.S if you need to message me again here is my email Azrail@optonline.net

Cyndi Lauper info

I am wondering why a site that is not even up yet is linked but I cant get mine linked. http://www.cyndilauper.us??? Cyndisource 18:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC) I have found even more dead links what the correct way to repair these errors???Cyndisource 05:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Can you please tell me how to add my site to the links? as you know I am new to this and I am lost....

Read This Chimp/Chump - Whatever

Read the following first. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers

Then stop biting me and my page. Show that you have at least the simplest modicum of respect for the territory and the preferences of others. Thus far you have simply shown that you are rude, immature, and not too subtle when it comes to communication. Then read my personal pages again and show some respect for me and my wishes. Such things take great precedent over all else, IMHO, which you ought to respect as well. Janniejdoe 20:24, 17 September 2006

• Janniejdoe - how is it that you won't tolerate civil commentary on your own talk page but you're more than willing to dish it out on others' talk pages? That smacks of hypocrisy. You're just being so rude to User:Alphachimp right now - Alison^✍ 06:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Civility Warning

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

I've been reviewing your pattern of recent edits and see a lot of comments that could be interpretted as extremely incivil. I'd encourage you to assume good faith on the part of other editors, particularly in the maintenance of this talk page and your responses to other users on both their talk pages and in AfDs. Thank you :). alphaChimp^(talk) 05:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Warning Removal

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. alphaChimp^(talk) 05:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

I would suggest that you lay off my personal talk page ....

Like anyone who actually understood what it means to be civil and polite, which you apparently do not.

Janniejdoe 20:35, 17 September 2006

Lee Pryor article

I was composing a biographical article about Lee Pryor, a business man in New Orleans, LA. I saw that it was deleted shortly after I created this article, but I wanted to know why. Did it violate the code of advertising an individual? This article is not for advertising purposes- I am aiming to write it as a neutral third party. Please let me know what I can do to modify this biographical article so that it is acceptable.Leepryor 19:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Hilary

Selected anniversaries

Could you help me please? I'd like to insert some new facts into Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/October.

• Oct. 23.:
  • "National Day in Hungary (1956)" -> "50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution"
  • Into the text: "1956 - Hungarian Revolution broke out against Stalinism and Soviet occupation in Budapest with a peaceful crowd of 300 000 demonstrators."
• Oct. 25.:
  • new statement: "1956 - During the Hungarian Revolution, hundreds of peaceful demonstrators were killed in front of the Parliament Building, Budapest."

Thanks in advance. NCurse _work 08:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Please have a look at that: Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/October 23. Protected. NCurse _work 06:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help! NCurse _work 06:15, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 18th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 38	18 September 2006	About the Signpost

"Citizendium" project aims to rival Wikipedia	Report from the Simple English Wikipedia
News and notes	In the news
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

2nd Poll:

Hi everyone! This is the 2nd poll ever to be sent out. Please read the Disclaimer below & enjoy! -- Spawn Man 09:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Poll 2 - Writing subjects

• Question 1: When you edit or write articles on Wikipedia, do you specialise, or tend to write about a single or select topic range? For example, only frogs or only movies.
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)I have a few topics I write about. D)Don't know. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 2: If you have more than only one topic range, what are the top 3 topics or subjects you write about on Wikipedia? For example, frogs, movies & cars.
  • A)My top 3 are... B)I have less than 3 topic ranges. C)Don't know. D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.

• Question 3: Have you ever written or edited an article about your home town or the city you live in?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Briefly. D)Don't know. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 4: Have you ever edited what was, or turned out to be, a controversial subject or article in current news or on Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Not sure. D)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 5: Have you ever reverted vandalism?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Not sure. D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.

• Question 6: Have you ever helped get an article to Featured Article status?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)I helped partly. D)I've edited a Featured Article after it was promoted, but never helped to get one featured. E)Not sure. F)Other... (Please explain). G)Abstain.

• Question 7: Do you find it difficult to think of things to write about on Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 8: On Wikipedia, do you edit articles to do with Wikipedia policies & voting etc more frequently than you edit actual encyclopedic articles?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)I have an equal mix of the two. D)Occasionally. E)Not sure. F)Other... (Please explain). G)Abstain.

• Question 9: Do you wish there was a Wikipedia article about your life?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 10: Would you like to expand the range of topics you write about on Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)I don't know. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 11: Do you usually write about topics that are to do with your job, school or hobbies?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)I don't work, I've never been to school & I don't have hobbies. :(. E)I don't know. F)Other... (Please explain). G)Abstain.

Disclaimer

Hi everyone. If this is your first time filling out a survey, read this. To fill out a questionaire sheet, simply send me a post to my talk page, clearly stating your choice for each answer. For example: For Question 1, you might choose to place on the message, "Q1: A)" or "Question 1: Choice A." etc etc. It's up to you, as long as I get the general jist of what your choices are. You have around 1 week to return a survey sheet, but late entrie's will be accepted.

Remember however, your personal choices may be read whilst they are on my talk page. I will understand if you don't wish to answer some or all of the survey due to this. For this reason I have also placed an "Abstain" choice for each question. Try & answer truthfully, or don't answer at all if you can't.

However, your personal choices will not be expressed on the survey's outcome, instead it will be part of a larger finding, such as "60% of people eat chocolate, 25% never eat chocolate & 5% of people chose to abstain from answering..." I will never say, "90% of people eat chocolate, while only Fruityman said he didn't..." This would be an invasion of privacy. However, if a question has (Please explain) or (Please elaborate) as a choice, your specific answer may be used in the survey outcome, although your name will not be. If a question does not have (Please explain) as a question choice, but your intended choice is not represented on the choice list, then feel free to provide another choice which fits your description.

You're probably getting bored reading all of this so I'll wrap up. To see outcomes of the results, see my Polls subpage. Feel free to comment on anything! Feedback is always welcome. Most importantly, have fun. Topics will vary greatly & surveys may be resent out at later times to re-assess a consensus if survey numbers have grown significantly. If you know anyone who would be interested in these surveys, send them to my talk page or if you see this survey sheet, send your own answers in! Thanks. -- Spawn Man.

NinjaNubian/Mykungfu AGAIN

The user has used various IDs and IPs such as Bobbydoop, Mikeandike,User talk:152.163.100.130, User talk:64.131.205.160, User talk:68.175.26.54. Having been blocked before, the NinjaNubian ID was only created about 2 weeks, after the Alpha Phi Alpha article was semi-protected so that anonymous or newly registered users could not edit the article. After about 7 days when the ID was no longer new, he began his vandalism and revert war again. The user then created another ID Mykungfu saying he lost his password to NinjaNubian. Since admin attention was brought to the ID Mykungfu via an AfD and RfC, the user has used anonymous IP addresses to revert and remove the AfD template on the page Alpha Kappa Nu as well as comments on the discussion page[15] and comments on the AfD itself[16]. User has also used Anonymous IPs to remove dispute templates from article Sigma Pi Phi.[17] Mykungfu's edits under anon IP are traceable.[18] -Robotam 20:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

• As he has begun editing and reverting my talk page, User:Mykungfu now claims that he is being reported because of an "edit war." Unfortunately, the only person warring is User:Mykungfu. Everyone else is either ignoring him or reporting clear violations by User:Mykungfu, per wiki policy. Article Alpha Phi Alpha was protected because of User:Mykungfu. When consensus is built on articles that he/she disagrees with, his MO is to flame the article or people's personal pages, and accuse everyone else of be a sockpuppet, even though he/she is the one that uses various anon IPs to do so, which are traceable to his/her ID. And when someone reports him/her, he simply breaks wiki policy by editing out their report (claiming they too are a "vandal" or "sockpuppet"), comments[19] or template (even on their own page)[20][21], as if no one investigating will read the history or logs to see what he is doing--or he tries to flame them by repeating their allegations back against them. His IP and ID's have been previously blocked; It was on the verge of being blocked again that he "lost" his password to NinjaNubian and created ID Mykungfu. No, I am not a sockpuppet of any form, but as I sign my name, I welcome any admin to verify both of our accounts. -Robotam 13:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Finally

Finally, a new page patrolling admin. They are rare sightings for me.--Andeh 16:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Well CAT:CSD is much easier, instead of hunting for articles they are dumped right on a plate for you. But a lot of articles do get missed. You could always moan at the admin boards? Heh. --Andeh 16:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I have taken action!--Andeh 12:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Warnings

I have never edited a Wikipedia article. I have had several warnings about articles I have not read. Perhaps the problem is that I use AOL. This is annoying.

Budd Whitebook whitebook@aol.com

Garaass

Would you consider re-blocking Garaass (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) indefinitely? That's clearly not a new account, so no point just giving a short block and then have to reblock if they return. Petros471 14:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I meant to say new user, not account, but it also happens to have been around a while and been vandalism only in that time. Petros471 14:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I didn't check every single contrib but the ones I did were all sneaky vandalism. Thanks. Petros471 14:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Bhumibol Adulyadej

This is an FA on the King of Thailand. It has suffered repeated vandalism and nonsense since the coup started. Can you lock it til thinks settle down or tell me where to report it for fast action? I put a notice on the bio notice board, but they're way behind. Pls repsond on my talk page. Thanks. Rlevse 14:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

thank you. Rlevse 19:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi It has been a LONGGG time!

Hey Alphachimp! it is your old friend Annahly visit my page again! if you can! I have not been on Wikopedia for many many months!!! so Hi again! hope you remember me! and her is my new e-mail: Wasup_Sister@hotmail.com and here is my new un-official website link: http://www.annahlysart.bravehost.com by by!

Annahly

AOL User...please unblock

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Alphachimp for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "I wanna marry you and buy you a horse that trotts!". The reason given for I wanna marry you and buy you a ho Your IP address is 64.12.116.13.

Tvccs 20:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

External link

(Progressive Rock bibliography) Alphachimp wrote: Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. alphaChimp(talk) 14:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, external links should help people to find resources for further reading, shouldn't they. So what could be more helpful for further reading than a bibliography? I don't see a problem here. Same thing has been done on other wikipedias, and nobody had a problem with it. Anyway: information is what people are looking for, so please don't remove a chance to get some. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.196.8.102 (talk • contribs)

Undeleted userpages

Hey, when the deletion reason is "Contained private information posted here by a banned user evading his block", don't just undelete the entire page history with the private information intact, okay? --Cyde Weys 00:08, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

I checked the revisions and couldn't find any private info. I removed the 3 revisions that could have been from a blocked user. If you see any revs that reveal sensitive info, please delete them. alphaChimp^(talk) 00:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I guess it's not obvious what the bad information is if you don't know what you're looking for. Let me go sanitize it. Needless to say, ILP hasn't been doing anything productive in awhile now; his sole activities seem to be agitating for Nathan to be unblocked, which, of course, is never going to happen. --Cyde Weys 00:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

That seems fine to me. I honestly spent 20 minutes checking the page for anything that seemed awry, and I found nothing. I contacted ILP and asked him for any personal info diffs. But please, if you find anything, delete away. I just want him to have a userpage. alphaChimp^(talk) 00:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Just look at the diffs I've deleted. It should be quite obvious, at the least, that nothing productive was going on. --Cyde Weys 00:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Rumbled

They've found you out! Tyrenius 00:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

It's a classic. I've put it on AN to cheer everyone up. Oh no, I'm talking to myself again. Tyrenius 01:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

hi

hi well i was just wondering why you have blocked my friend with the name: Yes my name is sarah, i mean can you tekll me why you blocked her, i dont think its fair, can i have some help too with creating a user page i am a bit unsure on how to go about it. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bread & rice (talk • contribs)

hi

sorry forgot to put the signature, my page is Bread & rice —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bread & rice (talk • contribs)

its me

you blocked Yes my name is sarah, p.s are you a christian Bread & rice 01:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

hmm

um well maybe its expired, her ip adress is 150.101.236.42, how old are you lol i am so bored Bread & rice 01:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

alrightyyyyyyy

fine well anyway thanx for the help may we keep in touch lol?

k

well i gotta go , talk sometime, wheneva ur not busy or remember, or wateva, c ya lol frm me Bread & rice 01:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

ok bye

Need your comment on a situation

On Nigel McGuinness, real name Steven Haworth, there is a dispute including myself and other editors against TrishBunkey (talk · contribs) over listing of the real name of the professional wrestler in question. The real name is sourced and verifiable with Trish, who appears to be the webmaster of McGuinness's website, citing privacy issues while I'm citing Wikipedia is not censored (though that probably doesn't cover this case) and precedents such as Criss Angel. Tracy, who is in violation of WP:3RR, is unwavering. Could you give a comment on the situation? –– Lid^(Talk) 01:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you and sort of related is this dispute over Wrestlemania III over the dispute of attendance. The official numbers have long been disputed but 3bulletproof16 (talk · contribs) keeps removing the entire thing quoting the "status quo" while i'm stating that the dispute is known and even when I do provide sources he "trumps" it with a website from 100megs4u.com. –– Lid^(Talk) 02:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Ah I now know why he keeps removing the whole thing, a lot of fans don't like Dave Meltzer and his opinion of the man is that of any other internet blogger, even though this information predates blogs as it was written in 1987 and the mans been doing wrestling journalism for twenty years now. –– Lid^(Talk) 02:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

hello again

lol that thing that you told me about to waste time seemed very boring i hate to say. thanks for being my friend since i dont have many. i wiegh 152 kgs and im 170cm tall and im a girl i have braces and glasses, can you help me find a boyfriend or can you help me to learn how to set up another account. thanks a lot luv ur bestest budddy Bread & rice 03:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Name Changes

I'm asking all of you nicely to stop editing the page. It is not relavant to his career. It's just people being nitpicking and exerting power to show off. Every single othert nfo site on the internet respects privacy, why not you? Is it REALLY that important to you???? Wrestlers give their lives, bodies health for entertainment. Can you not give something back??? :( :( Just leave it out because I'm asking you to. If you put it back, it's disrespectful.

User:TrishBunkey

User:TrishBunkey

I'm not sure how involved in this fiasco you are, but it seems pretty clear to me that she's User:65.173.213.250 The IP has made the exact same edits that Trish was blocked for, very few other ones, and has edited Trish's talk page. Tromboneguy0186 14:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

RETF Cleanup

Extra whitespace removal as far as I can tell. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 15:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey Gravity

Hello there. I noticed that you'd proposed the Hey Gravity article for deletion. I was hoping that this wasn't going to go ahead as I read the criteria for band inclusion and Hey Gravity match it on several points. They also contain a member of Dodgy who were an important band from the 90s.

All the best, Graham GWP 16:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Nigel McGuinness and User:TrishBunkey

Another admin unblocked her, saying that by inserting his real name we were violating WP:LIVING. I don't know. If you can help, great. This situation just needs to be resolved. In my opinion it'll be a sad, sad day if this all falls through. Tromboneguy0186 22:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

This has gotten really bizarre [22], Talk:Nigel_McGuinness#Personal information. The other admin has now locked the entire article and removed the real name citing "WP:DICK, WP:NOT and WP:LIVING". The admin also deleted TJ Spyke (talk · contribs)'s userpage due to it having McGuinness' real name listed. This is getting out of hand. –– Lid^(Talk) 23:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Now every page that listed his real name has been deleted from the history, this is no longer "getting", it is now simply out of hand. –– Lid^(Talk) 23:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

This sets a really really bad precedent, its choosing to remove public information (not private) and hiding it from ever having been mentioned. Can it ever be re-inserted? What if other locations pick up the name and wikipedia becomes the anomaly without it? It's times like this I wish wikipedia is not censored applied to more than pornography. –– Lid^(Talk) 00:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I can understand wanting to avoid legal qualms, but I don't see how it applies here as the records are entirely public. Unless I am mistaken using public records could not cause any hassles whatsoever. –– Lid^(Talk) 00:13, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

This case needs more input, as you stated the line has been drawn way too close. It hasn't even gone through any channels yet, not even a note on WP:AN, or WP:RFC. Such a large change and incident should have more than one admin (the other one) dictating the policy and really needs a lot more input. The most suprising thing about this incident is the silence behind it. I just think therere needs to be more input on this. –– Lid^(Talk) 00:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I saw that page but it still falls under the argument of input, apart from dubhagan who only asked the question the only person who gave input was FCYTravis (talk · contribs) with nothing else before judgment was handed down. Also the population of the biography noticeboard is much lower than that or WP:AN or WP:ANI so getting a better discussion was unlikely. Really I just think this should be posted elsewhere before being swept under the carpet. –– Lid^(Talk) 00:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't care if it takes us nowhere, I just wish for a simply more well rounded discussion. It can be completely one-sided against me and I still won't mind because all I want is more input. The current straw situation is just too small to get a cohesive point to what should've been done. Please just help me out here with this, even if I get crucified for it (yeah like that's going to happen) at least I'll know we had a proper discussion with multiple sources on it. We've already got one wikipedian leaving and one blocked, both for the same reason, and I'm still not convinced that reason is a strong enough point yet. I just want a larger discussion forum. I've been keeping a level head and being civil about this because I can understand the other side, but being told to simply drop it in the face of what I believe, and near as I can tell all wikipedian policy believes, is just wrong. The reason I'm asking you instead of posting it myself is because you carry more weight than I do and I know you agree with me. If I were an admin I would've posted this already, but I am not and have never been nominated or gotten a barnstar heh, but you are and one of the best ones. Please just create a discussion. –– Lid^(Talk) 00:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you and now if I get steamrolled so be it. –– Lid^(Talk) 01:16, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Wow just re-read that big block of text I just posted, the grammar I used in that is horrible and the sentence structure is just as bad. I really need to start proof reading posts on talk pages more often, especially as I proof read my posts elsewhere for grammar and spelling mistakes as well as fixing structure. Yes this has nothing to do with the debate at hand but wow, that's just terrible writing on my part. 01:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

It'd set a bad precedent if more than 4 people knew about it. This is out-and-out bullshit. When one individual can dictate what we can and cannot do here, despite time-honored policy and verifiable, factual information to the contrary, this operation isn't worth its circuits. Tromboneguy0186 00:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

You said you could block my account? Please do so. I don't even want to be able to log back on Tromboneguy0186 02:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

You might want to check out Talk:Nigel McGuinness, someone's been messing with it, including its history. James Duggan 21:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Update, the debate still rages with me getting near accused of committing original research by using the glossary of the USPTO website as well as a secondary source interview being found however now the reliability of the secondary source is in debate. I'm glad this discussion is still going but it's a back and forth battle with no side getting a real foothold (well now there's a secondary source but even that may be thrown out as original research due to connections). –– Lid^(Talk) 04:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

You've been a great help to me. ILovePlankton 03:34, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

well personally I don't care what Cyde thinks of me. He is only angry because I put a log of him trying to get help to ban Nathanrdotcom. ILovePlankton 03:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Alphachimp

Hey Alphachimp (aka Tyrenius, aka Yanksox, aka Crzrussian) thank you for supporting my recent RfA. I really appreciate your support. And I'm sorry I pushed you out of the WP:100 top 10! ;) Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 10:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

three revert rule...

The user Khosrow II violated the three revert rule in the article List_of_English_words_of_Turkic_origin. He reverted the article more than three times. I don't know where to complain. Would you please help me to solve this problem. --Chapultepec 16:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you AlphaChimp. I don't think to report him for the time being. It will be useful for future possibilities.

Chapultepec 19:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

That was swift action on the corset spammer. Thank you!!! Zora 01:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

block

You blocked me for 16 hours for the 3 RR on Anousheh Ansari article. You blocked me because user Siobhan Hansa said in Administrators' noticeboard/3RR this: Comments:User was blocked briefly for the same behavior on the same artice on 2006-09-20 and the page protected (see #User:Machocarioca_reported_by_User:alidoostzadeh_.28Result:_protected.29). The changes he is making are strongly contested on the talk page and The image he is trying to insert is the same as one that has been deleted by admins on several occassions as a copyright violation. You blocked me without earing my side, what in my opinion is not justice,not the work of an administrator.

The point is, if you want to read that article: The assert that Ansari is first female tourist in space is a POV. There are press sources too, saying she's only the first who paid the ticket, not the first one. See here [23]. Britton Helen Sharman was the first one in 1991, as you can see in her article. She was a civilian selected in a kind of lottery to be the first UK citizen in space. Of course she didn't pay for the trip, but to be a tourist we don't need pay the ticket, we can win it, right? Then, the assert "first female tourist" is not exact. I said that and changed that assert.

1. I was never before blocked before for this matter. Briefly or longer, as this user is saying.

2. This user Siobhan Hansa suggested, as a consense, in the talk page, the words The first space tourist to have passionately pursued the development of private space flight." Himself proposed that. I did it. He and a mad guy named Hektor reverted. Can you believe? I did what the user proposed and himself went to Administrators' noticeboard/3RR with my name for you! Of couse I reverted again, it was proposed by himself!. And of course the assert "first tourist female" can´t stay there.

2. About the image, which is the official photograph of Ansari in NASA site: They're nuts. He and user Hektor are talking the image I uploade is unfree. As you can see here [24] this image was uploaded from NASA biography of the astronaut and is use free and public domain , as dozen of another one's from astronauts that are placed in the articles about them here. These guys are nuts. The old image I uploaded (the same) wasn´t deleted by any administrator, but by a unkown IP, maybe a sockpuppet, I don´t know. As you can see in my talk page, administrator Gwernol never deleted that image, but others, in the same article. I didn´t uploaded the images he deleted.

3. The question now is: If you blocked me, what are you going to do with these users, specially with this mad Hektor, who insists in delet the free image and tag it as copyrighted?

And I can´t agree with "first female tourist in space", it can´t stay there, isn't exact, I'm a serious space exploration student and I have a close contact with copyrights.

Sorry for my english and thank you Machocarioca 07:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)machocarioca

Finally

I finally figured it out. Look, before we start anything else, I'm not a troll or a sock. I do honestly love the admins that are here and I want to show gratitude towards them by showing how incredibly awesome they are. I thought about it real hard the last few days, but I think Alphachimp, Crzrussian, Yanksox, and Tyrenius are like the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad. They will kick yo ass and you won't know what happened. Of course, this leaves the opening for Bill. I think it's pretty damn obvious who Bill is, none other than Samir. Yatuern 11:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

• See Finally. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Unblock

I was blocked due to two users with obvious bias deleting my edits. They were going to the web sight more than I was so they should have been prevented. My edits were backed up.

Are they going to be blocked from editing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.116.74 (talk • contribs)

I have no idea what you're talking about. alphaChimp^(talk) 17:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks

Hi, Alphachimp, and thanks for supporting me in my recent request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 70/4/4. I hope I can live up to your expectations, and if there's ever anything you need, you know where to find me! --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Well well

I think what I wrote about Clift was perfectly reasonable. what's a fact? what's an opinon? If I say she's ugly as sin or screeches like a whore being ass raped, is that fact or opinion?

I don't appreciate your tone in general.

[25]But, you're tone is awesome in comparison! Yanksox 03:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 25th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 39	25 September 2006	About the Signpost

Erik Möller declared winner in Board of Trustees election	Wikimania 2007 to be held in Taipei
Arbitration clerk Tony Sidaway resigns	Report from the Dutch Wikipedia
News and notes	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Poll 1 - Wikipedian relationships RESULTS

Poll 1 - Wikipedian relationships

• Question 1: Do you feel that other Wikipedians are as nice (or as horrible!) as when you started editing Wikipedia as a registered user?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Roughly about the same. D)Don't know. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 2: If you answered "No" above, how have other Wikipedian's attitudes changed?
  • A)They have grown nicer. B)They have grown meaner. C)Don't know. D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.

• Question 3: Are admins as nice as you think they should be? If you're an admin, try to be truthful...
  • A)Yes. B)No, they are nicer. C)No, they are meaner/grumpier. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 4: Have you ever been in a serious dispute on Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No, I've never been in a dispute. C)No, I've only been in minor disputes. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 5: Have you ever been blocked from editing Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Not sure. (You can find out by checking "My contributions" & selecting "block log"). D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.

• Question 6: Have you ever met another editor on Wikipedia in real life?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Not sure. D)Other... (Please explain). E)Abstain.

• Question 7: Do you enjoy communicating or working with other editors on Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 8: Have you ever taken a "Wikibreak" due to stress from other editors?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)No, I've only taken a "Wikibreak" due to un-editor related stress. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 9: Have you ever collaborated on an article with another editor on Wikipedia?
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Several times. D)Not sure. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

• Question 10: Do you envy other editors on Wikipedia for their achievements or good fortune? Be honest...
  • A)Yes. B)No. C)Sometimes. D)I don't know. E)Other... (Please explain). F)Abstain.

Poll 1 - Wikipedian relationships - RESULTS

These are the results for Poll 1 - Wikipedian relationships. For the actual questions see above. Other (please explain) answers may have their text placed into these results for clarity. However, only a selection of Other (please explain) samples may be included if full selection is too big. Options not expressed means that nobody picked them. Any thoughts are appreciated.

• Question 1: Of the 14 editors to answer Q1; 3 editors (21%) chose option A), 6 editors (43%) chose option B), 2 editors (14%) chose option C), 1 editor (7%) chose option D) & 2 editors (14%) chose option E), saying "People need to be nicer to one another. The other site I tend to inhabit is much more civil, and always has been" & "It really depends on the individual; some are as nice as ever while others have acquired noticeably dourer dispositions."

• Question 2: Of the 7 editors to answer Q2; 3 editors (43%) chose option A), 2 editors (29%) chose option B) & 2 editors (29%) chose option D), saying "The focus needs to be more on building the encyclopedia, and less on internal politics, in my opinion" & "Passive aggressiveness is more prominent than before."

• Question 3: Of the 14 editors to answer Q3; 4 editors (29%) chose option A), 2 editors (14%) chose option C), 3 editors (21%) chose option D) & 5 editors (36%) chose option E), saying "Admins need to realize their behaviors reflect on the entire Wikipedia community" & "Again, it depends on the individual" & "Administrators are not as professional as they should be."

• Question 4: Of the 14 editors to answer Q4; 8 editors (57%) chose option A), 5 editors (36%) chose option C) & 1 editor (7%) chose option E), saying "It depends on the definition of "serious". I've been involved in some that got fairly acrimonious, but mostly over things that might be considered relatively trivial in some quarters."

• Question 5: Of the 14 editors to answer Q5; 1 editor (7%) chose option A), 11 editors (79%) chose option B) & 2 editors (14%) chose option D), saying "Yes but it was overturned" & "I was blocked by accident when someone hacked my email."

• Question 6: Of the 14 editors to answer Q6; 5 editors (36%) chose option A), 7 editors (50%) chose option B) & 2 editors (14%) chose option C).

• Question 7: Of the 14 editors to answer Q7; 8 editors (57%) chose option A), 4 editors (29%) chose option C) & 2 editors (14%) chose option E), saying "For the most part, yes" & "Yes, but not always (but more than 'Sometimes')."

• Question 8: Of the 14 editors to answer Q8; 5 editors (36%) chose option A), 6 editors (43%) chose option B), 2 editors (14%) chose option C) & 1 editor (7%) chose option E), saying "Only to deal with real life time consuming things."

• Question 9: Of the 14 editors to answer Q9; 9 editors (64%) chose option A), 1 editor (7%) chose option B), 3 editors (21%) chose option C), & 1 editor (7%) chose option E), saying "I suppose I have, but not directly. I haven't spoken to someone directly and said, okay let's work on this together."

• Question 10: Of the 14 editors to answer Q10; 2 editors (14%) chose option A), 7 editors (50%) chose option B), 4 editors (29%) chose option C) & 1 editor (7%) chose option D).

Hope you enjoy the results which you, the editors of Wikipedia, changed in every way. Have a ncie day! -- Spawn Man 10:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Need Assistance

Hi! I may need an urgent help for editing one of the pages in Wikipedia. Since I have added a subtitle in "Queen's College, Hong Kong". One of the users frequently put my name on it that I purpose to put the information on it. Unfortunately, he/she also puts the name of the place where I study at. This user used multiple IPs which I cannot band them all. I don't know can it be considered as defamation. I hope you would suggest me ways to solve the problem, thanks. Narold 09:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Merge by Months

Wow, your bot has been busy. This really helps a lot, especially for future merges, thanks. Now if only there was a way to divide the september entries by date. But otherwise we just have to work hard to clean it all up, works too. :) Garion96 (talk) 11:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

z=Z(x.t) z-Z=0 d(z-Z)/dt d(phi)/dx=u

80.237.173.67

Hello. I usually use Tor, but it's usually blocked from editing on WikiMedia wikis. I went to look something up on Tor and saw I wasn't logged in but had new messages. I was brought to User talk:80.237.173.67. To be consistent with policy, permanently block 80.237.173.67.—a thing 04:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Lysander123

Funny, but it seems to me that someone who is new to Wikpedia would not know how to post an unblock request within 50 seconds of being blocked. I think he's an experienced vandal. --ArmadilloFromHell 06:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

The sockpuppet

strikes again. I especially love 1. the edit summary at AIAV and 2. the fact that you didn't do the block! :) - CrazyRussian talk/email 03:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

blocking?

I have received this message and am unaware of what exactly it is. I have never visited these pages, or even thought of doing such vandalism. I understand if this wasn't by purpose, but I'm not sure what is going on. Thank you

My message: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Optic recess, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 02:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not change "Lienbow" to "Alianbow" in articles for Power Rangers. The name was shown to be spelled as "Lienbow" at the end of the newest episode. Ryūlóng 00:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ryūlóng 00:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Allen county museum, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVD+ R/W 04:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

You have AOL, which is frequently blocked for short durations due to heavy vandalism. I wouldn't worry about it. alphaChimp^(talk) 01:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment on user page

Hello. Since you are an experienced admin, I thought that I could ask if you could make a comment about this user page. Looks like blatant spam, is there something supposed to be done about it? Best regards.--Húsönd 03:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I only removed malicous posts

Check the history of the page and what I deleted. I applies to the open complaint

TrishBunkey

Institute on Biotechnology and the Human Future

Hello, I am trying to post information about the Institute on Biotechnology and the Human Future at Illinois Institute of Technology. I have premission from the Institute on Biotechnology and the Human Future to post information from their website about their activities and research. My article keeps getting deleted, I think because some of the content matches the IBHF website. How can I prove to Wikipedia that I have permission to use their website information? Thank you for your assistance, I'm new at this! --- Jonrhodes18

Another instance of Nigel McGuinness' real name

Since you were prominently involved in the whole schpiel (especially in the removal of the edits inserting his name), I wanted to bring this up for you: link I've reverted the edit, but the anon included the name in the edit summary. -->So sayeth Methnor^{Sayeth back}|_{Other sayethings}

can we have an article on E-Choupal please ?

Hi,

I have prepared an article on E-Choupal and would like to post the same here. I guess it is protected, so please let me know if i can do it or not. If you want i can send it to you for discussion too.

Regards, Mahip

Hey

hey i made an account

Radio Racket

They're not personal attacks. Everything there is 100% true.

Admin

I want to be an admin how do i do it?

why the deletion?

why do you keep deleting the dan horgan page? how is he not a legitamite person to write about? he is a published writer at the age of 16! that's pretty rare, and should be in wikipedia.

deletion?

why do you keep deleting dan horgan? he is a published writer at the age of 16...that's pretty rare and should be included on wikepedia