Welcome edit

Hello, Alexduwright, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Feedback on Draft:Kelly Wanser edit

Hi Alex. Thanks for writing the this informative, interesting article. It's always good to see coverage of people in science and climate change.

You're probably wondering whether the article qualifies for inclusion in Wikipedia, and I'm afraid I'm not sure at this point. Wikipedia's rules are, to most people, weird when it comes to deciding whether an article should be included are not. The way it's generally determined (described here) is to look at what's been written about the person (in this case Kelly Wanser), in published sources that are "independent of the subject". There generally have to be at least two such sources and they both have to describe the subject in some depth. I'm not seeing sources that fulfill this criteria, so if you were to submit the draft for approval, I'm guessing it would be declined.

That said, there's quite a large grey area when it comes to determining whether biographies can be included or not. If you'd like some help from people who have a lot more experience with biographies than I do, the people at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red are awesome. You can introduce yourself there anytime and ask for help.

In terms of the draft itself, it has lots of great information about a remarkable person. There are a couple of issues that caught my eye. One was the statement that she "advised" the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory "on commercialization strategy for fusion energy." The cited sources for this statement say that she was working with the lab but (unless I missed something) not that she was advising them on commercialization strategy for fusion. I imagine that you learned this information from a different source, which would need to be cited.

Another issue is that the article presents mostly a pro-marine cloud brightening point of view. It would need to describe opposing points of view as well to comply with Wikipedia's Neutrality policy.

If you have time to contribute further to our existing articles on climate change or anything else, that would be awesome. Creating new biographies can be very tricky, but contributing to existing science articles is much more straightforward. Again, thanks for your efforts and good luck! Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 05:22, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Wanser (June 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MapleSoy (talk) 03:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Alexduwright! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MapleSoy (talk) 03:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Wanser (December 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Missvain were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 06:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Kelly Wanser edit

 

Hello, Alexduwright. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kelly Wanser".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 07:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Kelly Wanser edit

 

Hello, Alexduwright. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kelly Wanser".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply