Aheezay
October 2016 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak was changed by Aheezay (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868809 on 2016-10-20T07:37:12+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Not a minor edit and you replaced properly sourced material with a twitter feed. Meters (talk) 07:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Neera Tanden. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Aheezay, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Aheezay! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC) |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi Aheezay! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 11:00, Friday, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
October 2016 edit
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- In particular, please study our policies related to content about living people, notably WP:BLP, along with our policies on reliable sourcing, WP:RS and WP:V. All content must be verifiable in a reliable source, and what we write about living people must be sourced to high-quality sources. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
BLP Discretionary Sanctions notice edit
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Democratic National Committee cyber attacks. Donner60 (talk) 02:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
November 2016 edit
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. If you have questions, please contact me.- MrX 11:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC) - MrX 11:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Reliable sources edit
Hi Aheezay. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I wanted to let you know that we have some pretty strict policies about sources. Any material added to articles, especially articles involving living people, must be verifiable in reliable sources. I mention this because I had to remove a couple of edits you made to Podesta emails because they were not properly sourced [1] [2]. Blogs, Twitter feeds, personal websites, and some websites like Salon are not usually usable, especially for controversial content about living people.
A good resource for checking sources is the reliable source noticeboard You can search through previous discussion to see if a source has been discussed in the past, and how the community views its reliability. You can also post a new request to have a source and corresponding content reviewed.
I also recommend consulting article talk pages before making major edits. There you can see if a similar edit has already been discussed, and if it has consensus. You can also propose an edit on the talk page before adding it to the article, getting some support for it first, or advice on how to make it better.
U.S. Political articles are a bit of a minefield to edit (thus the above alert), so please don't be discouraged if a lot of your edits are reverted. Feel free to ask any questions you have and an experienced editor will help you understand our policies and guidelines. Happy editing!- MrX 12:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Glenn Thrush.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Glenn Thrush.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)