😔Edit

--Floquenbeam (talk) 19:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

I think we can agree on that one. Me and MrX rarely agreed either but that does not mean I wanted to see them leave like this. I do hope you return. PackMecEng (talk) 19:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
I endorse this comment. I always viewed MrX as someone I could approach for a better discussion no matter if we disagreed on the content. Mr Ernie (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Well that's a shame. I was going to ask MrX to help write a refinement of the RfC guidelines to cover challenged closes, because we have terrible processes around this and it is probably the only area on Wikipedia where a single person can effectively mandate specific content. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
MrX, I do hope you return to the project, even if after you take time off. Your contributions have been superb, and greatly valued - certainly by me and many others. You know, I'm strongly reminded of a quote by John G. Roberts, Jr., talking about a difficult case:
"Any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you're in a difficult area. And the function of his dissent, to make us focus on what we were deciding and to make sure that we felt we were doing the right thing, I think was well-served."
We the community - and ultimately our end-user, the reader - have always been well served by your contributions and wisdom. And it would be regrettable if this one messy disagreement between you and Guy — two users I respect very much — led you to part ways with the project permanently. Be well, and all best wishes. --Neutralitytalk 21:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Neutrality, Thank you. I like and respect MrX. I am mystified by the trajectory this has taken, and genuinely mortified that he has expressed a desire to leave, on which I hope he reconsiders. I hope people will take a look at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment § Process for challenging closes. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry that you're taking a break because of this, it's unnecessary, except of course as merited holiday if stress was too high. It's unfortunate when what should be a hobby becomes responsibility, work and no play (and that of course happens because we care about the project). I hope to see you around again when you feel like it, —PaleoNeonate – 02:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Best of luck with what you do. Kraose (talk) 13:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

This is a sad turn of events, but here's to happiness in your break, and in your life, MrX. starship.paint (talk) 03:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

  If you ever come back, here's some tea for you. Lucky wiki-tea doesn't get cold. starship.paint (talk) 14:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Rather late here due to my break, but like others I wish you well and happiness in your life. I'll never forget the help you gave me when I first started here and even after that, you remained someone I could look up to as an editor for his wisdom and who always remained civil even amidst the most controversial discussions. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Please trim your statement at arbitration case requestsEdit

Hi, MrX

I understand you are taking a lengthy break / are retired, but if you could limit the size of your statement to 500 words or request an extension to your statement limit. By my count your statement is around 1000 words. Requests for extensions of the word limit may be made either in your statement or by email to the Committee through this link or arbcom-en wikimedia.org if email is not available through your account.

Thanks and I do hope you consider returning.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

This rule really, really, really ,really, really needs to be dumped. And its enforcement really, really, really ,really, really needs to be contingent on reading the room. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
After a discussion on clerk-l, we wont enforce word limits for you. So please ignore the message from myself above. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 06:15, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A toast sandwich for you!Edit

  Looks like I missed something a few months ago, and only just realized I hadn't seen your name around in a while.

Looking at the food or drink items in the WikiLove gadget like greeting cards, I'm thinking about the signification of the various options. Something sweet? Savory? Coffee/tea seem pretty generally friendly, I guess. I'll go with toast sandwich because I have no idea what that would mean to receive a toast sandwich. Kind of a "huh?" -- but maybe a "huh?" that draws your attention to Wikipedia long enough to come back after a [restful, hopefully] break. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!Edit

  Also miss having MrX around. Great contributor. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 18:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

"PLAYPOLICY" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect PLAYPOLICY. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 23#PLAYPOLICY until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dave's GardenEdit

 

The article Dave's Garden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NWEB

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 02:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)