Abhinavinternet 10001

Welcome

Hello, Abhinavinternet 10001, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KyloRen3 (talk) 22:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

June 2021

Newslaundry

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Newslaundry, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- DaxServer (talk) 22:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

I will provide citation Abhinavinternet 10001 (talk) 23:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

I noticed you made some further changes to the article. I have reverted the changes for now, and I had added the reasons on the talk page. I am reposting the same here for your convenience:

You added two more instances under the "Reception" section which was previously titled "Controversies". In the first instance that they have added (about the Central Vista Redevelopment Project), the user claims that the claims made by newslaundry were misleading (which is not corroborated by the citation). Furthermore, in the second addition (regarding the Sharjeel Usmani), the first line indicates an FIR against his tweet. Since this was not a newslaundry publication, placement of this information does not make sense in the article (especially as Reception of newslaundry). The same applies to the second statement. The speech seems to be personal and not an official publication from newslaundry, hence this does not fit in the article. Reverting for now, (please add more sources if reverted back again).

If you find further citations for the first issue, please add it back. The second issue seems to be irrelevant to the subject matter. Thanks! ShellPandey (talk) 09:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Vivek Agnihotri

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vivek Agnihotri, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Vivek Agnihotri, you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hey,there was no citation provided which refers to Vivek Agnihotri associated with right wing Abhinavinternet 10001 (talk) 04:12, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

You need to provide a citation for this, I had provided a citation for my updation, if you can then please do otherwise you are you are all powerful why do you need genuine people like me trying to update and correct things. Abhinavinternet 10001 (talk) 04:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

That article is poorly written and poorly sourced, and it does not help if you are replacing content with POV material sourced to the article subject, or the sources from a BJP spokesperson as in your most recent edits. I did remove that sentence about him being "right wing" as it was poorly sourced, but you are adding sources that do not even mention the Agnihotri or support the sentences you are adding them to. Also, could you please stop marking your edits as "minor" because that has a very specific meaning, as per WP:MINOR. You can also read about how to indent your talk page comments at WP:TPG. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

I will not added any citations from any particular party spokesperson but the term right wing has no citations, so I think that shouldn't be existing there, I am apologize for those poor citations. I will try my best to improve the user quality and not deteriorate and mislead them. Abhinavinternet 10001 (talk) 04:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

What's wrong with the citation of Observer Research Foundation, this article is written by Niranjan Sahoo, PhD who is a Senior fellow with ORF's Governance and Politics Initiatives. The article is not targeting any political thought, any party then how come it violates Neutral Point of View Abhinavinternet 10001 (talk) 05:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

David Frawley

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to David Frawley. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:35, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Okay so he getting Padma Bhushan is a my own personal analysis, President of Indian Council for Cultural Relations says something about Dr Frawley which I mention on his page is my personal review, please explain. Abhinavinternet 10001 (talk) 07:50, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Exactly what the message above says: "Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles [...]" You cannot add your personal analysis to Wikipedia. It must be sourced from reliable sources (Wikipedia:Reliable sources). You need to add content and citations in a neutral point of view. -- DaxServer (talk) 07:59, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

You added WP:PUFFERY and WP:UNDUE detail; this is an encyclopedia, not a free site for hagiography and promotion. As for this moment, your account is 13 (thirteen) hours ols, with 31 edits, and you've already received four warnings and a DS-alert. Continue like this, and your Wiki-participation will be finished very soon. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:35, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Scroll.in

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Scroll.in, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Frawley. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Abhinavinternet 10001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  S0091 (talk) 23:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

DS-alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. Sai Deepak (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:J. Sai Deepak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:J. Sai Deepak, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 14:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Abhinavinternet 10001! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 14:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhinavinternet 10001. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 12:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:J. Sai Deepak

Hello, Abhinavinternet 10001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "J. Sai Deepak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)