Aanuarif

Deletion discussion about Sunny Ali

Hello Aanuarif, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sunny Ali, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunny Ali.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CNMall41}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CNMall41 (talk) 06:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Salman (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anna Salman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Raafay Israr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raafay Israr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raafay Israr (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 17:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello Aanuarif. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Sunny Ali, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aanuarif. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aanuarif|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 17:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello Saqib,

I don't work for anyone or am directly affiliated with anyone within the scope of my edits. Same applies to Sunny Ali. My edits/articles are mostly of my countrymen that I try to put on the global map. Aanuarif (talk) 22:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Based on your removal of the notability tag and moving other pages to the mainspace despite being declined in AfC (which were also worked on by other SPA accounts), it is very likely you have a conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. Unfortunately, your conduct would need to be brought up at WP:COIN should it continue. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sunny Ali, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. As you did here. CNMall41 (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Raafay Israr.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Raafay Israr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Waqar Zaka

As previously mentioned, please refrain from including promotional content in BLPs and avoid using unreliable references as citations. It's important to exercise extreme caution when making edits to BLPs, especially since they fall under the WP:CT/IPA. Before restoring the promotional material, please consider that any edit warring could result in a block. I kindly request that you provide an explanation here for the inclusion of unreliable references. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm also pinging @Ganesha811: who cleaned up this BLP early this year. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Saqib!

All the citations are of independent and reliable sources, including Business Recorder (A national Newspaper of Pakistan that also operates internationally), Samaa News (National TV channel & news website), Tribune, Dawn News, and more. There is nothing promotional material, everything is cited from independent sources. Aanuarif (talk) 19:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Your claims are not accurate. While the sources you mentioned are indeed RS, they don't verify the claims you're trying to add. It appears you're using these sources as citations to support WP:OR, which is considered disruptive editing. Additionally, you've used various unreliable sources like Fashion Times, Something Haute, Coin Telegraph, ProPakistani, TechJuice, OKX, Gizchina, and even Twitter and YouTube, which are all unacceptable sources, particularly for BLPs. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I would request you to again go through the citations and what exactly are they being referred to. Coin Telegraph is an internationally acclaimed source for Cryptos and related information. OKX is a crypto exchange where many acclaimed cryptos are traded. Twitter, YouTube, ProPakistani I had already removed. Aanuarif (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

These sources are all considered PR sites and we typically avoid citing them, particularly on BLPs. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Agreed! However, I can provide more citations from Independent Sources. Provided the information stays there, perhaps you can add the Citation Needed template at places where required. Aanuarif (talk) 19:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I recommend that you create a draft in your own user namespace. I'll review it to ensure it complies with WP:BLP standards. I won't advise you to directly edit this BLP. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

You mean on my talkpage? Aanuarif (talk) 20:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, BTW why are you promoting him as a cryptocurrency expert? To my knowledge, Waqar Zaka has paid users in the past to edit his BLP. Has he done so again? Otherwise, why would you or anyone promote him so blatantly as a cryptocurrency expert when he's not? —Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure if he has paid anyone! He is a cryptocurrency expert, again as written by several publications and was hired by the Govt. of KPK in the same role, for which I had given the citation of Business Recorder. Here's the link: https://www.brecorder.com/news/40092705

Hope this helps! Aanuarif (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

BTW, may I ask why are you removing all the information? To my knowledge, there have been cases in the past where someone had paid to remove the information of Pakistani influencers and leaders. Is again some opposing lobby doing so? Aanuarif (talk) 20:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Really? I'd like more information about those cases. Could you please provide it, or are you making this up? —Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

@Aanuarif, I want to emphasize that Saqib is correct - your edits appear to be promotional in nature and do not conform to our standards for reliable sources and WP:BLPs. Further editing of this nature could lead to your behavior being seen as disruptive. I recommend you take their advice. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

@Ganesha811 Do you have any thoughts on how I've been editing this particular BLP? Feel free to share your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waqar Zaka (3rd nomination). —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Kami Paul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kami Paul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kami Paul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Lenny Massey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lenny Massey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenny Massey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Wahab Shah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wahab Shah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wahab Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 12:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Natasha Khan (Pakistani singer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natasha Khan (Pakistani singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Khan (Pakistani singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 12:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Lkomdis (talk) 06:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Lkomdis,

I'll refrain from any discussion. Saqib's behavior seems unethical and it seems like he has some COI with the subjects of my articles or articles I edit. I'll let the admins decide what's best for Wikipedia. Until then, I'll not be editing anything. Peace! Aanuarif (talk) 06:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

LMAO, literally. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes! It's not just me but in general your behavior has been reported by a lot of other people as well. Peace 🕊️ Aanuarif (talk) 07:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Sunny Ali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunny Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunny Ali (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Kashan Admani moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kashan Admani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kashan Admani has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kashan Admani. Thanks! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Aanuarif. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theroadislong (talk) 13:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waqar Zaka (3rd nomination). Comment on content, not on fellow editors. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

My apologies!

It was a reaction after he kept calling me a paid editor. I'll be polite in future. Aanuarif (talk) 17:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Dream Station Productions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dream Station Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream Station Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of We Are One (global collaboration song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article We Are One (global collaboration song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Are One (global collaboration song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Acoustic Station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acoustic Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acoustic Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

– Joe (talk) 09:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Usman Sheikh, Aag Band.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Usman Sheikh, Aag Band.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Haroon Sheikh - Frontman of Aag.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Haroon Sheikh - Frontman of Aag.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)