Your submission at Articles for creation: Juliana Schroeder (2) (June 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TJMSmith was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Subject does not meet WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. I think it's a case of WP:TOOSOON. She seems to be on an upward trajectory.
TJMSmith (talk) 23:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, MAPPLab! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TJMSmith (talk) 23:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, MAPPLab, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! TJMSmith (talk) 23:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Juliana Schroeder edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Juliana Schroeder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - RichT|C|E-Mail 08:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Juliana Schroeder (2) has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Juliana Schroeder (2). Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 06:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I would suggest that you simply cut & paste your draft into the existing draft and then resubmit that - rather than creating a new draft on the same individual. If you need a hand doing this let me know. Dan arndt (talk) 06:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Dan arndt: I would appreciate some help in doing this! Thank you! A&W100 (talk) 06:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
The draft article needs to be re-worked - remove most of the external links. If they are relevant include them as cited references, same with the section on media coverage (rather than a list) incorporate them into the article itself.Dan arndt (talk) 06:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

About Draft:Juliana Schroeder edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Juliana Schroeder a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:Juliana Schroeder (2). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 06:47, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juliana Schroeder has been accepted edit

 
Juliana Schroeder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply