January 2019 edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Student Bodies. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Martinevans123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to It's the End of the World as We Know It (And I Feel Fine) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

More block evasion edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 4 (New York City Subway service), you may be blocked from editing. Cards84664 03:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cards84664 18:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 02:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.94.57.91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have no vandalism that was a lie no reason not to block me please review it I'm sorry I have done nothing about it the blocked was made on December 6, 2021 without vandalism no behavior. 69.94.57.91 (talk) 20:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The edits you made on that date, which were subsequently deleted, justify the block. In short, yes, you did vandalize. —C.Fred (talk) 20:43, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.94.57.91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I reviewed it check it again C.Fred [[1]] stop lying there's no vandalism you are a liar C.Fred is not on the list I re-check it already. 69.94.57.91 (talk) 20:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Rechecked deleted contributions.[2] Your edits to a now-deleted page were pure vandalism. —C.Fred (talk) 21:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply