Welcome! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (67.98.222.34) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Marianna251TALK 22:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to World Poker Tour— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018 edit

  Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Skies the Limit. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 01:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello 67.98.222.34, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. I am not sure you are aware of this, but the version you have restored was plagiarized from a book. It is detailed at Talk:New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad#Copyright problem removed. I hope you understand this content is being removed only because of plagiarism concerns, not because of any other problem with the edit. Thank you. epicgenius (talk) 02:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hi. Sorry about reverting New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad to a version that had infringed on copyright (Talk:New_York,_New_Haven_and_Hartford_Railroad#Copyright_problem_removed). However, the older version is superior in its content, language use and structure, which is why I initially thought it made more sense to restore it. The current version is choppy and cobbled together. I propose the old version be used as a template for a rewrite that does not plagiarize ("The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source"). I am a legal copyrighter and editor for a television network in Santa Monica and regularly paraphrase and rewrite large bodies of text for a living. Thoughts? 67.98.222.34 (talk) 21:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
I don't have a problem with this proposal. Rewriting it in a paraphrased format is acceptable, as long as it's sourced. I could help add back some information, but I don't have that much time nowadays, so I guess you could have a go at it if you want. epicgenius 21:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Very good. I will give it a shot over the next several days (should probably create a username at some point as well). Thank you much. 67.98.222.34 (talk) 00:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Imagine (John Lennon song), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Binksternet (talk) 21:38, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at I'm Stepping Out. Binksternet (talk) 22:04, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Circumcision surgical procedure, you may be blocked from editing. KNHaw (talk) 03:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Petrb. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Robinson Canó— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Miguel Díaz-Canel—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply