Welcome to my talk page!
Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
  • Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
  • Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
  • Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
  • To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
  • You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Thanks for taking the time to read this. Marianna251TALK 20:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Guidelines from {{Template:User talk top}}.

Dennis Nilsen edit

Nilsen was of course Scottish by birth, but his crimes were committed in London. Therefore, wouldn't a description of British be more appropriate? Many articles on offenders of this nature in America describe the offender as American rather than Texan etc.Kieronoldham (talk) 23:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Kieronoldham: Thanks for the message! There is a distinct difference between the parts of the United Kingdom and states in the USA, however. Describing a Texan as an American has a better analogy with describing a Glaswegian (someone from Glasgow) as Scottish. If you call a Texan an American, you're not likely to get thumped in the face the way that you might if you told the wrong Scottish person that they're British.
UK nationalities are very complicated even to someone born and raised in them, like I was. The key difference is to remember that England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland were all independent countries and have only relatively recently formed a union. Texas was never its own country; Scotland was, up until only a few hundred years ago. When it comes to people from the UK, it's best to reflect either the way they describe themselves or the way the sources describe them. The sources on Nilsen almost all describe him as Scottish. Hope that helps. Marianna251TALK 20:33, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ooh, just found the Wiki page WP:UKNATIONALS - it gives an overview of just how complicated UK nationality is and has been historically. See also the UK government's list of ethnic categories. Marianna251TALK 20:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Marianna251. Argh. Was sat on the fence and could see merit in either description being the better one. I know most of the sources describe him as Scottish (I largely populated the article). Off-topic to a degree, but I have Scottish in-laws and have visited Scotland frequently in my lifetime. For the most part, they have a better sense of nationalism than most English people. I learned quickly not to talk loudly on buses and trains due to the glares I sometimes received - especially at Inverkeithing .--Kieronoldham (talk) 21:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

New section edit

Excuse me I am beginning to get extremely frustrated at you just thinking it’s ok to constantly throw your comments about on my talk page and I think you should stop like, now? Or I will be reporting you. That’s your only warning. Got it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liamdaniel981 (talkcontribs) 17:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Liamdaniel981: If you continue to do a bad job of editing, you'll get warned. Issuing nonsense threats to fellow editors will get you blocked. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:24, 2 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I don’t think anyone asked for your opinion. Fancy minding you own business? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liamdaniel981 (talkcontribs) 17:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
(by talk reader) I never identified myself! I'm a talk page stalker; I deal with editors like you when I'm bored. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Liamdaniel981: Three things: first, when leaving a comment on another user's talk page, please make a new section at the bottom of the talk page. I had trouble finding your comment because it was added into an old discussion. I've now moved this thread to a new section. Second, please sign your talk page comments with ~~~~. Third, you made a personal attack on an editor (who happened to be me) in this edit, calling me "thick" and a "spacker". Personal attacks are not tolerated on Wikipedia. I left a relatively mild warning on your talk page because the edit is fairly old now (I didn't notice it sooner because I'm only semi-active), but if you had attacked another editor, they might have reported you immediately.
I have also corrected a mistake you re-inserted on Ian Blackford, again, but in the spirit of compromise I've left your unsourced change in. I've tagged it with "citation needed". Please be aware that any editor can come along and remove unsourced claims on the grounds that they are not verifiable.
I am far from the first or only person to leave messages on your talk page. Please start paying attention. Sources are not optional, and if you keep making unsourced changes, other editors - myself included but by no means only - will keep reverting them. If you're frustrated with that, I suggest that you read the messages you've been given, read the linked policies, and try to understand why there's a problem so that you can avoid similar problems in future. Attacking other editors will not change anything, but is much more likely to get you blocked than me leaving legitimate warnings on your talk page. Marianna251TALK 07:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Missing edit

Long time, no see. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply