April 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Holy Week in the Philippines has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:45, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not blank pages, as you did with this edit to Seven Churches Visitation, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kahoot!, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kahoot! was changed by 67.134.32.82 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879404 on 2017-04-11T21:01:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:39, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Crasstun. I noticed that you recently removed content from Portal:Culture without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crasstun (talk | contributions) 20:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holy Rosary School (Seattle, WA) (May 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thsmi002 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thsmi002 (talk) 18:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 67.134.32.82! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thsmi002 (talk) 18:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Holy Rosary School (Seattle, WA)

edit
 

Hello, 67.134.32.82. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Holy Rosary School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Abelmoschus Esculentus 05:20, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2019

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ionian Revolt, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Tdts5. I noticed that in this edit to Culture of Italy, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tdts5 (talk) 17:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm --WikiUser1234945--. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kindness—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 19:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jermain Wesley Loguen have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 15:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jermain Wesley Loguen. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jermain Wesley Loguen was changed by 67.134.32.82 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866655 on 2023-10-09T15:27:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:27, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jermain Wesley Loguen, you may be blocked from editing. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 19:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply