2600:1700:2160:4A70:0:0:0:55E

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tommy Adkins (July 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:27, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 2600:1700:2160:4A70:0:0:0:55E! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:27, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tommy Adkins author (July 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: sadly nothing to suggest that they pass WP:NAUTHOR

Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tommy Adkins author has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tommy Adkins author. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Tommy Adkins author

You repeatedly post on my talk page that you have reliable sources, your draft has no sources at all? Wikipedia requires sources to be in depth reliable and independent, click the blue links for more details. In order to demonstrate your notability, you need to provide multiple references to in-depth articles written about you in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books or online. Your draft has zero sources so cannot be considered. You can ask for help at the Wikipedia:Teahouse since you obviously do not understand what`I am telling you and I'm sorry about that. Theroadislong (talk) 15:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Tommy Adkins author

Everything posted on Tommy Adkins author is true and very easy to check.

 Courtesy link: Draft:Tommy Adkins Wikipedia is not interested in "truth" only what reliable sources say about a topic, your draft has zero sources and no indication of notability.Theroadislong (talk) 22:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Tommy Adkins author

Thanks for your time. It's still unclear to me what reliable sources are. Certainty Wikipedia should be considered, maybe not. I think it may be more of a flip of a coin thing or personal taste. Anyway thanks for the consideration..

See here WP:RS for what constitutes a reliable source, Wikipedia absolutely cannot be used as a source, it not a question of personal taste. Theroadislong (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Tommy Adkins author

Ok I just read in your talk section "Wikipedia is not interested in the truth only reliable sources." Well that explains it. Thanks again..

Tommy Adkins author

Really you should check google, Amazon, all major book sellers Book a Million , Barns and Noble etc, The Library of Congress, The Panama City Florida New Harald, I could go on but it seems useless. You still won't say what a reliable source is. But I am a author with 12 books to my credit. Sold in England, Australia, Japan. It's all out there and easy to find if you look.2600:1700:2160:4A70:0:0:0:55E (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

The sources you list above are not independent, Wikipedia requires sources to be in depth reliable and independent, click the blue links for more details. In order to demonstrate your notability, you need to provide multiple references to in-depth articles written about you in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books or online. Your draft has zero sources so cannot be considered Theroadislong (talk) 16:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Tommy Adkins author

References "or on line " Google Tommy Adkins author you will find more references than you need.2600:1700:2160:4A70:0:0:0:55E (talk) 17:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes, Goodreads, Amazon, Everybody wiki, Worddisk, Facebook, eBay…absolutely nothing reliable or independent sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Tommy Adkins author

I completely understand not notable, that's purely opinion, that's fine. However unreliable sources is a incorrect statement and should be removed. It's plain you didn't fact check you only judged. 2600:1700:2160:4A70:0:0:0:55E (talk) 14:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft Draft:Tommy Adkins author has zero sources? If you added Google searches, Amazon book sellers they would not be reliable. Theroadislong (talk) 15:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tommy Adkins

Hello, 2600:1700:2160:4A70:0:0:0:55E. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tommy Adkins, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tommy Adkins

Hello, 2600:1700:2160:4A70:0:0:0:55E. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tommy Adkins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

---