January 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Big Day Out. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Muzzamo (talk) 23:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Terminator edit

  Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. --Niyant (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seven Samurai edit

Nice edits on the Seven Samurai article. Andropod (talk) 06:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Gregory House, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ian Botham has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. justinfr (talk) 23:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to BayTSP with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Falcon8765 (TALK) 05:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Credentialing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Satellizer el Bridget  06:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013 edit

  Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to James Hird, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Gilliam (talk) 02:37, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at James Hird, you may be blocked from editing. Gilliam (talk) 02:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Human respiratory syncytial virus because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 00:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm SeoMac. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Federalism in Australia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SeoMac (talk) 05:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Block evasion edit

Your edits are in violation of a current block at 129.127.223.233 and have been reverted, per WP:EVADE. - SummerPhDv2.0 15:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months--Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC) for block evasion, vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sisters of Invention (September 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 14:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 203.26.122.8, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 14:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2017 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. It is obvious that the coat of arms on the plane rudder is not the royal coat of arms. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Sisters of Invention edit

 

Hello, 203.26.122.8. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Sisters of Invention".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Brad Crouch , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

June 2017 edit

  Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Malley, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. David Brooks (talk) 05:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Deli nk (talk) 11:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Australian Cannonball Cup has been reverted.
Your edit here to Australian Cannonball Cup was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=141bFCkUeZo) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Recent edit to Ours (band) edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ours (band), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 14:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply