Celia Homeford
Kings of Spain edit
I was simply trying to add consistency to to Phillip II, III, and IV article because Phillip IV already had as his name Phillip IV & III so I added that to the other Phillip’s. If you have an issue you with it why don’t change Phillip IV & III? Orson12345 (talk) 14:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- You're 6 minutes too late: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_IV_of_Spain&diff=prev&oldid=1076320174. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- There names should include his numerals as King of Spain and as King of Portugal not just Spain. Perhaps we should revert back everything and discuss on article page.Orson12345 (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- You're 10 years too late: Talk:Philip II of Spain/Archive 1#Misleading denominations. It was established years ago that "Philip II & I" is a made-up name that should not be used. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- There names should include his numerals as King of Spain and as King of Portugal not just Spain. Perhaps we should revert back everything and discuss on article page.Orson12345 (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Really? You’re going to use as consensus from 10 years ago to justify your edits. Orson12345 (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that is the rule here. Previous consensus holds true and it is the new edit that needs to demonstrate a new consensus not the old one. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
To correct what I said about Philip IV. His numerals were Philip IV & III for at least a year, so my question is if there was a consensus to not use both numerals why didn’t you or anyone change it till now? Orson12345 (talk) 15:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. I don't doubt your word, but where is the discussion that led to the consensus to 'remove' the Portugal regnal numbers from the Bourbons? That way, I'll know & remember. GoodDay (talk) 21:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know who you're quoting or who wants to remove the Portugal regnal numbers. You should ask whoever that is. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Try it this way. Why did you revert my changes & to what discussions/consensus were you speaking of in your edit-summaries. GoodDay (talk) 01:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please see my edit summaries and above. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Try it this way. Why did you revert my changes & to what discussions/consensus were you speaking of in your edit-summaries. GoodDay (talk) 01:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Would you point to me the discussion that led to the results for the Hasburg Portugese monarchs? I'm not doubting your word, just don't remember those discussions. GoodDay (talk) 17:12, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- ↑ Celia Homeford (talk) 09:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
New pages patrol needs your help! edit
Hello Celia Homeford,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive edit
| New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol newsletter edit
Hello Celia Homeford,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thank you so much Celia for your continued guardianship of King Sihamoni's page - I've noticed over this past year, you've ensured to look after this page from time to time. It is much appreciated! :) Contributorthewise (talk) 22:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC) |
No intention to "alter" a Blockquote edit
I merely committed an honest mistake of using parentheses instead of brackets. But I will let things be with your reversion; although I did find the quote confusing and tried to clarify. Buszmail (talk) 20:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
November Articles for creation backlog drive edit
Hello Celia Homeford:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Prince William Frederick, Duke of Gloucester and Edinburgh edit
Hi Celia, thanks for your edits on my addition to The Duke's page regarding his clandestine marriage to Ann Maguire. You commented that you could not find the citation in the material. The documents containing the detail are held at the London Metropolitan Archive (I deposited them there myself last week) under the reference "Uncatalogued B23/103 RECORDS of ANTHONY CROSBY". I referenced this at the start of the paragraph and provided additional supporting references to Anthony Camp's publications. How can I better reference the deleted material to ensure it can be found? Thanks Graham Young Ee87gsy (talk) 11:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- I was referring to the citation I removed, not the archives or Camp. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed the citation for Old Bracknell House is just referencing a picture of the house. I am happy for this to be removed. However, the detail about The Duke providing the residence at Old Bracknell, Maguire's claims and Crosby's letters are in the LMA archive. So perhaps I should remove the Old Bracknell reference and provided a further reference at the end of the paragraph to the LMA? (I have documented much more detail about Ann Maguire and the Duke on Crosby's wikipedia page). Ee87gsy (talk) 13:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive edit
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
House of Glücksburg edit
Dear Celia, a problem ocurred at the article: House of Glücksburg, where i edited the following:
"While the official royal house of Denmark remains the House of Glücksburg although the current Danish king is a patrilineal member of the House of Monpezat, it is the other way round in the United Kingdom, whose current king is a patrilineal member of the House of Glücksburg, while the official royal house is the House of Windsor, which emerged from the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha."
I think you deleted all of that. The whole content of the above text is, however, already proven. The official royal house of Denmark remains the House of Glücksburg, this can be read on all official publications of the royal house.
If you took a closer look at the page House of Glücksburg, you will notice that there is much confusion about who now belongs to the house and who not, and it is therefore necessary to explain the situation about the kings of Denmark and of the UK in the lede. Otherwise, the insertion and deletion of those two kings will go on for ages. Krokusblum4 (talk) 13:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't seen those publications. You will need to provide them. All content on wikipedia should be cited. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think, you are one of the driving forces to push the deletion of the House of Glücksburg from the Danish king's page, and probably you are also one of the voices impeding the insertion of the Glücksburg/Windsor info. It's because of people like you, that there is ongoing confusion as to who belongs to which house. You seem to write about nobility all the time, but yet you claim not being able to find suitable sources. Now there is a page about a king without a house. For sure, it can't stay like that for long. Aside from that, the Danish article still states House of Glücksburg. Krokusblum4 (talk) 14:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Er, no. All you have to do to add the material is provide suitable sources. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think, you are one of the driving forces to push the deletion of the House of Glücksburg from the Danish king's page, and probably you are also one of the voices impeding the insertion of the Glücksburg/Windsor info. It's because of people like you, that there is ongoing confusion as to who belongs to which house. You seem to write about nobility all the time, but yet you claim not being able to find suitable sources. Now there is a page about a king without a house. For sure, it can't stay like that for long. Aside from that, the Danish article still states House of Glücksburg. Krokusblum4 (talk) 14:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Coronation medal citations edit
Hello Celia Homeford
As always, thanks for your superb oversight of Wiki pages concerning royalty & related matters.
A slight conundrum as how to cite Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh's award of the King Charles III Coronation Medal - and likewise for the vast majority of its recipients (going forward)...
Might a picture of her wearing it suffice or perhaps more official would be citing HM Govt's published eligiblity criteria for receipt of this Coronation Medal? (with which she clearly complies, viz. military appointments) qv. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64cb653b2322ce000dcd23b7/Coronation_Medal_eligibility_criteria.docx.
What do you think? because, as recently mentioned to DrKay, no official gazette or other comprehensive authorative source exists for such awards (Jubilee/Coronation/etc) given that so many (3,000+) are issued.
To me, "citation needed" on Wiki implies some doubt as to veracity, whereas there clearly is none here.
Looking forward to hearing - many thanks.
Best Primm1234 (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- If she's clearly wearing it, that's good enough for me. When you refer to the eligibility criteria, I presume you mean category 13 of Annex A? That's the only potential category for her as far as I can make out. Celia Homeford (talk) 16:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Celia Homeford
- Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh, complies under 8.A of these regulations but, on a wider issue, what about other recipients who appear in Wiki?
- Many thanks & shall I go ahead by updating her article accordingly?
- Best Primm1234 (talk) 16:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I can see how she can meet Annex A, category 13 (b). I don't see that she meets 8A. For that, there must be an "active contribution" ... "attendance at an event, i.e. as a guest, does not in itself qualify for the medal". Celia Homeford (talk) 08:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Eleanor of Aquitaine edit
Can you please explain why you removed the internal link to Eleanor of Aquitaine's family tree, which I am in the process of building. The interrelationships of French and English nobility of the time is so complicated, it requires a clear genealogy to make sense of it, rather than just a textual description. I am intending to revert your edit. Michael Goodyear ✐ ✉ 22:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- I see no reason to using a farcically archaic and absurd term like 'Acscendants' when all other articles on royalty use the usual and idiomatic 'Ancestry'. Article consistency should be maintained. Nor do I see any reason to depart from the project-wide consensus to use sentence case for sub-headings. 'Family tree' should be written in sentence case, as mandated by the Manual of Style. Also, per policy, edits that are undone should be discussed and not reimposed unilaterally by a single editor against project-wide consensus. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Tudor relevancy edit
Should I not have added the tudors to the template? My original purpose of the template was to show the basic transition from Stuart to Hanover. Sophia is clearly the key, there. Then I added the Tudors because it looked more like a simple 1→2→3 flowchart, but the "1" (tudors) was missing. —GoldRingChip 12:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see how the Tudors are relevant to the Hanoverians, or vice versa. There's a hundred years between them. I can see why such links are shown on arching articles like a family tree of all English monarchs, but that's not appropriate for a biography of an individual where family trees should show relationships relevant to the article subject's life. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- That is fine. I have now removed the Tudors. —GoldRingChip 13:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
First barnstar edit
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
| for this I must give you my first ever barnstar; we do not always agree, but here I could not agree more. SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC) |
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024 edit
Hello Celia Homeford,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
ANI Notice edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wentwort12 (talk) 12:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive edit
| New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Ernst August Move edit
Hi Celia,
You recently move the page for "Ernst August von Hannover (born 1983)" to "Prince Ernst August of Hanover (born 1983)". I realise it may be a bit unclear given the discussion wasn't on the talk page but this page title was discussed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(royalty_and_nobility)/Archive_24#Requested_move_7_June_2023
I believe you've made the move based on the short 2016 move discussion on the talk page where they say "There is no reason to translate his given names just because he is a prince. We wouldn't translate the given names of other living Germans." which is amusing considering his surname is not "of Hanover" and is in fact "von Hannover". Please revert the move and open a move discussion if you feel a move is needed.
Thanks D1551D3N7 (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- What User:Celia Homeford did is absolutely right. The discussion you are pointing out to does not cover the page on Ernst August nor does it cover the pages on any of his siblings. If you wish to move any of those pages, you should open an RM that specifically covers them so that the community make a decision by taking WP:COMMONNAME, WP:CONSISTENT and other factors into consideration. Keivan.fTalk 17:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Actually the reason to have one bigger discussion was for WP:CONSISTENT purposes as I would get accused of making pages inconsistent if I did 1 page at a time. This is a point I think I made within that discussion.
- I realise now that this is a different Ernst August to the one in that discussion, apologies. How the unprincely Ernst August can have a son who is Prince Ernst August is a mystery however, I think it would logically follow that his offspring wouldn't bear these fantasy titles.
- I've opened a move request on Ernst August now anyway. D1551D3N7 (talk) 17:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)