Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

June 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Windows 8, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Minima© (talk) 10:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Taiwan edit

I'm not going to bother edit-warring over it, but it's your grammar that's lacking not mine if you think "The political and legal status of Taiwan are contentious issues" is better or more correct English than "The political and legal status of Taiwan is a contentious issue", the long-standing version that I put the page back to and which allows for the fact that "status" can be read as a quasi-collective noun (for want of the correct technical term). The version you finally settled on, "The political and legal statuses of Taiwan are contentious issues", isn't much better. You've also insisted on changing - without mentioning it in the edit summary, or addressing the points I raised - the long-standing wording about military action. Finally, it would also appear that you - or someone at this corporate IP address - are also editing from another address. N-HH talk/edits 23:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Knowledge, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Velella  Velella Talk   21:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Slender: The Eight Pages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ZappaOMati 21:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Make a mountain out of a molehill. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jonathanfu (talk) 16:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2012 Delhi gang rape case, you may be blocked from editing. -- MSTR (Happy New Year!) 12:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2013 edit

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:45, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit warring report edit

I have reported you for edit warring. Please see the relevant section on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and consider responding there. wctaiwan (talk) 15:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2013 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to David Faustino, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Albion (town), Orleans County, New York constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Albion (town), Orleans County, New York, you may be blocked from editing. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 01:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cam Thomas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Anaxial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Karisma Kapoor because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Anaxial (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Bhusawal, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  A m i t  웃   14:14, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Taradehi (Village in Damoh District), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Evil of Frankenstein. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:09, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your article submission Taradehi (Village in Damoh District) edit

 

Hello 159.53.46.142. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Taradehi (Village in Damoh District).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Taradehi (Village in Damoh District)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm I am One of Many. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Benghazi without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! I am One of Many (talk) 04:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm TheMesquito. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Stephen Dadaian, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheMesquito (talk) 21:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Removal of content edit

Please do not remove massive amounts of content without explanation again like you did at Madison De La Garza. It came off as disruptive and is not helpful for articles. Using the edit summary would help editors understand your changes to articles. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:52, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) Media Viewer RfC edit

You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic. Alsee (talk) 20:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2015 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CityJet. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VG31-irl 11:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to College of DuPage— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 16:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion edit

 

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! JerryRussell (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC) Note: this is about your contribution to the Gordon Wasson article.Reply

July 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Sunmist3. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jose Solorio, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Sunmist3 (talk) 15:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Negative-calorie food ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Patrick Carr, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU () 21:44, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Towkio, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 153.202.196.196 (talk) 14:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Culver Academies edit

Hi there - thanks for your comment about Culver Academies. I do not think you are trying to vandalise the article, but the school's website is not a reliable source for information as it is not independent. Can you find an independent source for the school's history?

I have also tagged the article as having a potential copyright violation, as it looks as if some of the wording in the article is taken straight from the school's site.

May I suggest that you discuss this with other editors on the article's Talk page? Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply