To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Comments: Blocked for 1 year.
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

December 2006 edit

please knock it off. thank you. Mr Christopher 17:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

May 2007 edit

Nonsense edit in Philosophy of mind edit

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Philosophy of mind page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Aarktica 20:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

May 2008 edit

Hi, the recent edit you made to United States Senate career of Barack Obama has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ——Ryan | tc 00:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

July 2008 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Polymerase chain reaction, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Polymerase chain reaction was changed by 140.163.0.5 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-07-09T16:27:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008 edit

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Kanik, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing. cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 13:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to King Fisher has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 15:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Family of Barack Obama has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 01:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2009 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page State University of New York at Fredonia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Jackol  ๏̯͡๏﴿ 15:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The recent edit you made to the page State University of New York at Fredonia constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Jackol  ๏̯͡๏﴿ 15:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2011 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Odnoklassniki has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Guoguo12--Talk--  22:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2011 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sudan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Jncraton (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Greg Kelly has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Section blanking of Neocatechumenal way edit

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 16:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

June 2012 edit

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:Bleeding-heart libertarianism, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. Jprg1966 (talk) 17:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

September 2014 edit

Information icon Hello, I'm 7Sidz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Larry Donnell, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 7Sidz (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center (August 6) edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 19:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center (September 19) edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 01:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

October 2016 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Desierto has been reverted.
Your edit here to Desierto was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-VSV8CbsvI&feature=youtu.be, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-QG-V8Ro6w&feature=youtu.be, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggUQ8QeJUoc&feature=youtu.be) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:55, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your edits appear to pushing a distinct political POV, which is in violation of Wikipedia's policies, and being generally disruptive. If you continue this, administrative action will be taken to prevent it. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 00:44, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Desierto have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Desierto was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-VSV8CbsvI&feature=youtu.be, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-QG-V8Ro6w&feature=youtu.be, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggUQ8QeJUoc&feature=youtu.be) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Desierto, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 02:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Desierto, you may be blocked from editing. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:47, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Desierto. Donner60 (talk) 03:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katietalk 03:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2016 edit

Information icon Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Moonlight (2016 film)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU () 22:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Desierto, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Desierto have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Desierto was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-VSV8CbsvI&feature=youtu.be, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-QG-V8Ro6w&feature=youtu.be, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggUQ8QeJUoc&feature=youtu.be) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:35, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your draft article, Draft:Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center edit

Hello, 140.163.0.5. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 04:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


August 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Patti Cake$— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:10, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Blade Runner 2049— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 02:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Blade Runner 2049. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:14, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Blade Runner 2049.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Blade Runner 2049. Jim1138 (talk) 02:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center edit

 

Hello, 140.163.0.5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Star Wars: Episode IX have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: Episode IX. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — KB3035583talk 23:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.