March 2018 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to VDL DB300, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nightfury 09:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, M Countdown, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Evaders99. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to FNC Entertainment have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Evaders99 (talk) 04:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to C9 Entertainment have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Cignature edit

Please stop attempting to recreate the article Cignature. There was an Article For Deletion (AFD) discussion which resulted in the article being moved to draft space. The article you have created is entirely unsourced and does not at all show any notability for the group to warrant an article. You can find the draft here: Draft:Cignature. You are welcome to contribute to it, but please stop recreating the article when they do not meet notability guidelines. Alex (talk) 12:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Volvo Trucks, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Volvo Buses. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cignature, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop recreating it from the redirect. Work on the draft and show whether the group has charted on Gaon. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. edit

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at C9 Entertainment , you may be blocked from editing. Please stop recreating it from the redirect. Nonamehg16059 (talk) 22:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at C9 Entertainment. Evaders99 (talk) 07:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at İETT, you may be blocked from editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

{{unbl

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.79.29.209 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Admit that you did something wrong and that it won't happen again.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 06:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.79.29.209 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This means that you must either explain why the block reason is incorrect or not applicable to your conduct, or you must convince the reviewing administrator that you won't do it again.

Decline reason:

That unblock reason is instructions that you're supposed to follow. Copying and pasting it back to us accomplishes nothing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.79.29.209 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will not disruptive editing again and will make useful contributions instead

Decline reason:

It's difficult to tell whether you're incompetent or trolling. Either way, your talk page access is revoked. You can appeal from your account or via UTRS. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2022 edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chevrolet Enjoy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Evaders99 (talk) 07:03, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kinu t/c 08:30, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.79.29.209 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I did something wrong is sockpuppetry and won't happend again.

Decline reason:

This is not credible. Drmies (talk) 03:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.79.29.209 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary due to i am not disruptive editing on Wikipedia again

Decline reason:

This request is insufficient. 331dot (talk) 05:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.79.29.209 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead115.79.29.209 (talk) 03:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 03:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.