Ты не любишь меня, я  ненавижу тебя  не  играть с тобой. 

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Moral World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Banana Pictures

edit

Hello Яненавижутебя,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Banana Pictures for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 11:54, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Axcess News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Nelson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

REPCITE

edit

Hello. Have you read WP:REFBOMB? The article 11ic has this problem. --- Possibly (talk) 08:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 11ic

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 11ic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --- Possibly (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nutuge.com moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Nutuge.com, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 02:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 360 Military Web

edit
 

The article 360 Military Web has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any in-depth coverage. Currently, all 8 sources are simple listings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 16:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Constitutional Forum

edit

Hello, Яненавижутебя,

Thank you for creating Constitutional Forum.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The first link will not translate. A key issue here is to have content about xianzheng.net than about Chinese intellectuals and China blocking websites. So, more references about xianzheng.net are needed. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 20:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 11ic

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 11ic, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanKity (talk) 09:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 11ic for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 11ic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11ic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 15:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

"The Baltimore Post-Examiner" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Baltimore Post-Examiner. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 20#The Baltimore Post-Examiner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 08:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please disregard - my bad. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 08:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply