Grand Articles edit

I am a Grand Article nominator, I improve articles up to Grand Article-Class and once in a while, I review articles for Grand Article standards.

Workings edit

I meself have currently worked on 9 articles for Grand Article, 8 passed, 1 failed, none on review, and none awaiting reviews. They are all listed here below.

Pass edit

  1. Euro (talk), see discussion.
  2. 20 euro note (talk), see discussion.
  3. 10 euro note (talk), see discussion.
  4. 50 euro note (talk), see discussion.
  5. European Central Bank (talk), see discussion.
  6. 5 euro note (talk), see discussion.
  7. 500 euro note (talk), see discussion.
  8. 200 euro note (talk), see discussion.

Fail edit

  1. Schengen Area (talk), see discussion.

On review/On hold edit

Nominated edit

Taken out edit

Featured content edit

I have had only one nominee to the Featured class, which was the 2000s European sovereign debt crisis timeline (talk). It was nominated for Featured List-class, see discussion. In the end, it did not pass to FL-class. (3 opposals—0 supports.) I have not nominated any article to Featured Article ever, but I'd like to.

My User page policy edit

A policy to be followed on the types of articles as listed below:

Criteria for one of the prizes below:

  1. Page destruction, which is—
    (a) Tag override,
    (b) Page lengthening,
    (c) Avoidant vandalism,
    (d) Blanking, illegitimate,
    (e) Copyrighted material, repeated uploading of
    (f) Edit summary vandalism.
    (g) As described on WP:VANDALISM
  2. Bad-faith edits onto my user page and/or on spin-offs.
  3. Not following the Three Revert Rule and/or Edit Warring
    (a) Reverting someone else's edits more than three times in an 48h period here. (Pages not in these criteria have 24h period)
    Exceptions:
    • Reverting your own actions
    • Reverting actions performed by banned users, their sockpuppets and by tagged sockpuppets of indefinitely blocked accounts.
    As listed on WP:EDIT WAR.

AS YOU KNOW WIKIPEDIA IS FULL OF ANGRY LADS LIKE ME LOOKING TO BATE GREAT VANDALS LIKE YOU, SO I CAN'T TAKE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THEM IF THEY HIT YOU A BOX. (GIVEN BELOW)

For exceptional breakages of my user page policy is the:

  • Grand Prize: A free one-way bate out of Wikipedia, via WP:AIV BUT before that... A WP:TROUT!

For huge breakages of my user page policy is the:

For grand breakages of my user page policy is the:

For medium breakages of my user page policy is the:

For minor breakages of my user page policy is the:

Terms and conditions apply.

I therefore give ANYONE the right to hit the vandal(s) a box.

VALIDATED AS OF 19:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC) – Plarem (User talk contribs)

REVALIDATED ON 16:00, 22 November 2011 (UTC) – Plarem (User talk contribs)

My User Talk Page Policy edit

The User Talk Page Policy applies to a bit less pages. They are listed as follows:

The policy gives every person a right to:

  • WP:WikiLove.
  • Leave a comment/query.
  • CORRECT SOMEONE ELSE'S OMMISSION, MISSPELLINGS AND/OR INACCURACCIES. with a <s> sign ending with </s> and putting in the correct items. For misspellings, erase and type back in again.
  • And for unregistered users, point out omissions, inaccuracies and/or misspellings on my user page.

Everyone has a chance to revert someone else's edits ONCE. Other wise it is taken as Edit warring and you will get one of the prizes below.

BUT DO NOT:

If I leave you a message on your talk page, you leave me a {{talkback}} template on my talk page.

If you leave me a message on my talk page, I leave you a {{talkback}} template on your talk page.

AS YOU KNOW WIKIPEDIA IS FULL OF ANGRY GUYS LIKE ME LOOKING TO WARN GREAT VANDALS LIKE YOU, SO I CAN'T TAKE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THEM IF THEY GIVE YOU SOME PRIZES GIVEN BELOW.

For exceptional breakages of my user talk page policy is the:

  • Grand Prize: A free one-way ticket out of Wikipedia, via WP:AIV BUT before that... A WP:TROUT!

For huge breakages of my user talk page policy is the:

For large breakages of my user talk page policy is the:

For medium breakages of my user talk page policy is the:

For minor breakages of my user talk page policy is the:

Terms and conditions apply.

I therefore give ANYONE the right to give the prizes to the vandal(s).

VALIDATED AS OF 19:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC) – Plarem (User talk contribs)

A handy sandbox edit

THIS IS HERE TO REMIND ME OF THINGS THAT I WILL MOST LIKELY FORGET. WIKILOVE IS NOT REALLY GIVEN FROM ME TO ME. Template:Xmas3 Template:Xmas4

Archives of my user page edit

I have archived different versions of my user page. There are four versions, not including this user page:

Version 1 | Version 2 | Version 3 | Version 4

To improve edit

WikiProject European Union and WikiProject Numismatics. (WP:NUMI underlined)
WikiProject Poland

To create edit

No priorities, but in order.

  1. 2009 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )
  2. 2008 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )
  3. 2007 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )
  4. 2006 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )
  5. 2005 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )
  6. 2004 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )
  7. 2003 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )
  8. 2002 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )
  9. 2001 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )
  10. 2000 in Poland ( WikiProject Poland and WikiProject Years )

My barnstars/WikiLove edit

  The Barnstar Barnstar
For (1) remembering to come back and acknowledge something I did months ago; (2) editing the barnstar you placed on my page to more accurately acknowledge my actual contributions and then distinct lack of contributions when I decided to scram; and (3) your support during that sorry saga, and your apparent decision to follow me out. ˜danjel[ talk | contribs ] 18:36, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
  New GA!
The article 20 euro note you nominated for GA has passed. Well done! Puffin Let's talk! 08:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
  The GA Barnstar
For helping make 10 euro note a GA. Keep up the good work. Also please try to take time to review a GAN so that we can clear the backlog. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 
Katarighe has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!


If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

 
 
Vibhijain has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!


If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

 
  Euro-pean Union
A little comment on your work for the E.U.(RO):  
(Well, congrats anyhow ;) Benzband (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
  Dear Plarem, I am happy to inform you that I have reviewed the abouve article and I am happy that it meets all the requirements for good article status. I have granted Good Article status to the article. I hope you enjoy this cookie as a thank you from all of Wikipedia for your contributions. Oddbodz (talk) 22:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
  The Editor's Barnstar
2 more GA articles by you - 500 euro note and 200 euro note, now maybe you can consider something like WP:Good topic, for which you need to make Euro banknotes a GA. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 

Thanks for reviewing Brian Halligan and your inputs to bring it to a GA. And thanks for the barnstar! How about the GAN for David Meerman Scott next? :-)

Woz2 (talk) 14:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

  Thanks again for reviewing (and passing) my second GAN, David Meerman Scott Woz2 (talk) 17:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)