Talk:200 euro note/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vibhijain (talk · contribs) 14:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Section 4 needs a copy edit.  Done The whole "Enviromental impact" section is a copyvio of ref.no.14. Please fix it ASAP.  Done
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	"two hundred euro note (€200)" should be changed to "two hundred euro note (€200)".  Done I have done some changes as per WP:DASH, hope that is fine. YThat is fine. Why the legal information is under the "History" section?  Done Put "Tracking" under "Enviromental impact".  Done
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Ref no. 9 and 10 are same. Done And 'CTUOO1' means 'Can't think up of one 1'.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	"There has so far only been one ...... similar to the current one is to be issued from 2011.", the reference provided do not support this statement.  Done "The initial issue of notes bears the signature of ...... Jean-Claude Trichet, whose signature appears on subsequent issues.", this statement is also not supported by the reference given.  Done
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The environmental impact of the note has to be added; you can use this as an example.  Done
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	#"Environmental impact" section do not have a NPOV. Please fix that. Examples are: As an environment-friendly institution tries very hard to make a ... save people's health Euro notes are safe to use  Done, I think...
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	There are some more pictures here which are suitable for the article.  Done Just to comment on that for future reference. Pictures are NOT a GA requirement, but if you give me some, then sheesh, why not?
	7. Overall assessment.	I will wait for 7 days for the above issues to be solved. Thanks. :) Passed. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:18, 7 December 2011 (UTC)