Articles to create

edit

Linguistics

edit

Arts

edit

Music

edit

Other arts

edit

Social movements

edit

Machine learning

edit

Other

edit

Splits

edit

Potential moves/ptopic concerns

edit
  • Duncan Hines attracts a lot of bad(ish) incoming links intended to refer to the brand. Should probably split off a separate article for that.
  • Similar situation with Elizabeth Arden. In that case we do have a separate Elizabeth Arden, Inc. article, but a lot of the incoming links targeting the base name are referring to the brand, which strongly suggests that the current ptopic arrangement isn't working.
  • It seems very plausible that a reader on English Wikipedia might search for "preposition" looking specifically for information about prepositions in English (though it is implausible a user might use such a search term expecting to find information about, say, Spanish prepositions). The same goes for any other grammatical class or phenomenon you can name. But generally these base names go to articles that try to explain the concept cross-linguistically. And from those articles it's often not easy for readers to navigate to the en-specific article (e.g. a reader of Compound (linguistics) needs to do a lot of scrolling to find a link to English compound). Should these be considered full (rather than WP:PARTIAL) title matches, and therefore get a disambiguating hatnote link (or even be considered as competitors for primary topic status?).
  • Rename Thanksgiving (Canada) -> Canadian Thanksgiving? Article intro sort of frames "Canadian Thanksgiving" as an exonym. As a Canadian, I don't think that's quite true. (See, for example, the title of the Macleans cite)
  • Revisit clickstream data once it's available in a month or two re Talk:Keith Richard
  • Autotune vs. Pitch correction. Because the former term is so commonly used as a genericized trademark to refer to the broader concept of pitch correction, there are lots of wikilinks targeting this page which are just referring to pitch correction, not the specific software created by Antares. Same goes for much of the article's content.
    • Also possibly worth having a separate article on "extreme autotune", i.e. "autotune as stylistic effect" (as opposed to the more conventional use to hide minor imperfections)
  • Bridewell as a primary redirect to Bridewell Palace is probably a poor choice. Significant proportion of incoming wikilinks are mistargeted.

Old discussions that petered out but should maybe be revisited someday

edit

Misc content todos

edit

Other

edit
  • Revive old script for hiding "zero sum" edits from watchlist and polish it up. Maybe list it at Wikipedia:User scripts/List since it might be useful to others (e.g. Help_talk:Watchlist#Is_there_a_way_to_hide_edits_that_got_reverted)
  • Add a field for alternative/former names to Template:Infobox magazine (see Template:Infobox television for an example where this is already done)
  • Seems like there's a good argument for doing away with most navboxes which link to all recipients of a particular award, for the same reasons as given for WP:PERFNAV/WP:FILMNAV. Do some searching to see if this has been discussed before. I remember a discussion about navbox overuse more broadly that invoked the example of Meryl Streep (which is pretty heinous). See Category:Awards navigational boxes for many examples of such navboxes.
  • Expand the info about RfA and edit count at Wikipedia:RfA inflation based on the discussion/data at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship#RfA_edit_count_statistics. Maybe even split off a separate dedicated essay.
  • This line from WP:DABCOMBINE would probably benefit from a few accompanying examples (the way the bullets in the list above have examples): Editorial judgement should be used in deciding whether to combine terms in the ways described above. If a combined disambiguation page would be inconveniently long, it may be better to split the disambiguation page into separate pages.
    • Also, what about hidden categories for dab pages which are split by case/punctuation/diacritic variants?
  • WP:RMT should have (or link to) some kind of closing instructions. In particular, it seems unclear whether someone performing a listed technical request is also expected to do the sort of post-move cleanup steps described at WP:RMCI#Cleaning up after the move.
  • WP:EGGCREAM essay
  • Essay/how-to page on determining common name. Ngrams (with caveats about case sensitivity), search engines, etc.
  • Syphilis stuff
    • add more incomings to Premarital medical examination, such as from Marriage law
    • Create an article on Kahn test
    • Expand Premarital medical examination
      • More detail on legislation in countries other than US
      • Criticisms (esp. from physicians who criticized the accuracy of the Wassermann test)
      • More details on tests for diseases other than Syphilis. Esp. add a subsection on HIV testing, which was very briefly legislated in some jurisdictions in the 80s.
    • Add more details on pre-penicillin treatment regimens (with arsenic and bismuth). How were they administered, and over what schedules (seems like they were long!). Info about this could be added to Syphilis, History of syphilis, Arsphenamine, etc.
  • Make an infobox template for neural network models. Some fields that would be useful to have which are not present in software infobox:
    • License of code vs. license/availability of model weights
    • Number of parameters
    • Training data