Open main menu

United Airlines Flight 232

United Airlines Flight 232 was a regularly scheduled United Airlines flight from Denver (USA) to Chicago, continuing to Philadelphia (USA). On July 19, 1989, the DC-10 (registered as N1819U) serving the flight crash-landed at Sioux City, Iowa, after suffering a catastrophic failure of its tail-mounted engine, which led to the loss of many flight controls. At the time, the aircraft was en route from Stapleton International Airport to O'Hare International Airport. Of the 296 passengers and crew on board, 111 died during the accident, while 185 people survived.[note 1] The crash was the fifth-deadliest one involving the DC-10, behind Turkish Airlines Flight 981, American Airlines Flight 191, Air New Zealand Flight 901, and UTA Flight 772. Despite the deaths, the accident is considered a prime example of successful crew resource management because of the large number of survivors and the manner in which the flight crew handled the emergency and landed the airplane without conventional control.

United Airlines Flight 232
United Airlines DC-10-30 (N1852U-47811-302).jpg
Aircraft similar to N1819U
DateJuly 19, 1989 (1989-07-19)
SummaryUncontained engine failure due to faulty titanium alloy, leading to loss of hydraulics and flight controls
SiteSioux Gateway Airport
Sioux City, Iowa, United States
42°24′29″N 96°23′02″W / 42.40806°N 96.38389°W / 42.40806; -96.38389Coordinates: 42°24′29″N 96°23′02″W / 42.40806°N 96.38389°W / 42.40806; -96.38389
Aircraft typeMcDonnell Douglas DC-10-10
OperatorUnited Airlines
IATA flight No.UA232
ICAO flight No.UAL232
Call signUNITED 232 HEAVY
Flight originStapleton International Airport, Denver, Colorado
StopoverO'Hare International Airport, Chicago, Illinois
DestinationPhiladelphia International Airport, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Aircraft and crewEdit

The airplane, a McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10 (registration N1819U), was delivered in 1973 and had been owned by United Airlines since then. Before departure on the flight from Denver on July 19, 1989, the airplane had been operated for a total of 43,401 hours and 16,997 cycles (a takeoff and subsequent landing is considered an aircraft cycle). The airplane was powered by CF6-6D high-bypass-ratio turbofan engines produced by General Electric Aircraft Engines (GEAE).[1][2]

Captain Alfred Clair Haynes, 57, was hired by United Airlines in 1956. He had 29,967 hours of total flight time with United Airlines, of which 7,190 were in the DC-10.[3]

First Officer William Roy Records, 48, was hired by National Airlines in 1969. He subsequently worked for Pan American World Airways. He estimated that he had approximately 20,000 hours of total flight time. He had 665 hours as a DC-10 first officer.

Second Officer Dudley Joseph Dvorak, 51, was hired by United Airlines in 1986. He estimated that he had approximately 15,000 hours of total flying time. He had 1,900 hours as a second officer in the Boeing 727 and 33 hours as a second officer in the DC-10.

Training Check Airman Captain Dennis Edward Fitch, 46, was hired by United Airlines in 1968. He estimated that, prior to working for United, he had accrued at least 1,400 hours of flight time with the Air National Guard, with a total flight time of approximately 23,000 hours. His total DC-10 time with United was 3,079 hours, of which 2,000 hours were accrued as a second officer, 1,000 hours as a first officer, and 79 hours as a captain. He had learned of the 1985 crash of Japan Airlines Flight 123, caused by a catastrophic loss of hydraulic control, and had wondered if it was possible to control an aircraft using throttles only. He had practiced under similar conditions on a simulator.[4]

Eight flight attendants were aboard the flight: Janice T. Brown, Barbara A. Gillaspie, Timothy B. Owens, Georgeann Delcastillo, Susan White, Donna S. McGrady, Virginia A. Murray, and Rene L. Lebeau. Lebeau was the only crew member killed in the accident.[1]


Radar plot of the plane's flight path, from the NTSB report
Damage to the rear of the plane, from the NTSB report
Diagram showing engine components lost in flight, from the NTSB report

Takeoff and failureEdit

Flight 232 took off at 14:09 CDT from Stapleton International Airport, Denver, Colorado, bound for O'Hare International Airport in Chicago with continuing service to Philadelphia International Airport.[1]

At 15:16, while the plane was in a shallow right turn at 37,000 feet, the fan disk of its tail-mounted General Electric CF6-6 engine explosively disintegrated. Debris penetrated the tail in numerous places, including the horizontal stabilizer, puncturing the lines of all three hydraulic systems.[5]

The pilots felt a jolt, and the autopilot disengaged. As Records took hold of his control column, Haynes focused on the tail engine, whose instruments indicated it was malfunctioning; he found its throttle and fuel supply controls jammed. At Dvorak's suggestion, a valve cutting fuel to the tail engine was shut off. This part of the emergency took 14 seconds.[5]

Attempts to control planeEdit

Photo of United Airlines Flight 232 from the NTSB report, with the damage done by the second engine highlighted

Meanwhile, Records found that the plane did not respond to his control column.[1] Even with the control column turned all the way to the left, commanding maximum left aileron, and pulled all the way back, commanding maximum up elevator – inputs that would never be used together in normal flight – the aircraft was banking to the right with the nose dropping. Haynes attempted to level the aircraft with his own control column, then both Haynes and Records tried using their control columns together, but the aircraft still did not respond. Afraid the aircraft would roll into a completely inverted position (an unrecoverable situation), the crew reduced the left wing-mounted engine to idle and applied maximum power to the right engine. This caused the airplane to slowly level out.[5]

The various gauges for all three hydraulic systems were registering zero.[5] The three hydraulic systems were separate, so that failure of any one of them would leave the crew with full control, but lines for all three systems shared the same narrow passage through the tail where the engine debris had penetrated, and thus control surfaces were inoperative.[1] The crew contacted United maintenance personnel via radio, but were told that, as a total loss of hydraulics on the DC-10 was considered "virtually impossible", there were no established procedures for such an event.[1]

The plane was tending to pull right, and slowly oscillated vertically in a phugoid cycle – characteristic of planes in which control surface command is lost. With each iteration of the cycle, the aircraft lost approximately 1,500 feet (460 m) of altitude. On learning that Fitch, an experienced United Airlines captain and DC-10 flight instructor, was among the passengers, the crew called him into the cockpit for assistance.[5]

Haynes asked Fitch to observe the ailerons through the passenger cabin windows to see if control inputs were having any effect.[5] Fitch reported back that the ailerons were not moving at all. Nonetheless, the crew continued to manipulate their control columns for the remainder of the flight, hoping for at least some effect. Haynes then asked Fitch to take over control of the throttles so that Haynes could concentrate on his control column. With one throttle in each hand, Fitch was able to mitigate the phugoid cycle and make rough steering adjustments.

ATC was contacted and an emergency landing at nearby Sioux Gateway Airport was organized. Haynes kept his sense of humor during the emergency, as recorded on the plane's CVR:

Fitch: "I'll tell you what, we'll have a beer when this is all done."[6]
Haynes: "Well I don't drink, but I'll sure as hell have one."[7][8]

and later:

Sioux City Approach: "United Two Thirty-Two Heavy, the wind's currently three six zero at one one; three sixty at eleven. You're cleared to land on any runway."[6]
Haynes: "[laughter] Roger. [laughter] You want to be particular and make it a runway, huh?"[6]

A more serious remark often quoted from Haynes was made when ATC asked the crew to make a left turn to keep them clear of the city:

Haynes: "Whatever you do, keep us away from the city."[9]

Haynes later noted that "We were too busy [to be scared]. You must maintain your composure in the airplane, or you will die. You learn that from your first day flying."[10]

Crash landingEdit

As the crew began to prepare for arrival at Sioux City, they questioned whether they should deploy the landing gear or belly-land the aircraft with the gear retracted. They decided that having the landing gear down would provide some shock absorption on impact.[11] The complete hydraulic failure left the landing gear lowering mechanism inoperative. Two options were available to the flight crew. The DC-10 is designed so that if hydraulic pressure to the landing gear is lost, the gear will fall down slightly and rest on the landing gear doors. Placing the regular landing gear handle in the down position will unlock the doors mechanically, and the doors and landing gear will then fall down into place and lock due to gravity.[11] An alternative system is also available using a lever in the cockpit floor to cause the landing gear to fall into position.[12] This lever has the added benefit of unlocking the outboard ailerons, which are not used in high-speed flight and are locked in a neutral position.[11] The crew hoped that there might be some trapped hydraulic fluid in the outboard ailerons and that they might regain some use of flight controls by unlocking them. They elected to extend the gear with the alternative system.[11] Although the gear deployed successfully, there was no change in the controllability of the aircraft.[1]

Landing was originally planned on the 9,000-foot (2,700 m) Runway 31. Difficulties in controlling the aircraft made lining up almost impossible. While dumping some of the excess fuel, the plane executed a series of mostly right-hand turns (it was easier to turn the plane in this direction) with the intention of lining up with Runway 31. When they came out they were instead lined up with the shorter (6,888 ft) and closed Runway 22, and had little capacity to maneuver.[1] Fire trucks had been placed on Runway 22,[5] anticipating a landing on nearby Runway 31, so all the vehicles were quickly moved out of the way before the plane touched down. Runway 22 had been permanently closed a year earlier.[1]

ATC also advised that there was a four-lane Interstate that ran north and south just east of the airport which they could land on if they did not think they could make the runway. The pilot opted to try for the runway instead.[13][14]

The plane landed askew, causing the explosion and fire seen in this still from video taken by local news station KTIV.

Fitch continued to control the aircraft's descent by adjusting engine thrust. With the loss of all hydraulics, the flaps could not be extended and since flaps control both the minimum required forward speed and sink rate, the crew were unable to control both airspeed and sink rate.[15] On final descent, the aircraft was going 220 knots and sinking at 1,850 feet per minute (approximately 407 km/h forward and 34 km/h downward speed), while a safe landing would require 140 knots and 300 feet per minute (approximately 260 km/h and 5 km/h respectively). Fitch needed a seat for landing; Dvorak offered up his own, as it could be moved to a position behind the throttles.[1] Dvorak sat in the cockpit's jump seat for landing. Fitch noticed the high sink rate and that the plane started to yaw right again, and pushed the throttles to full power in an attempt to mitigate the high sink rate and level the plane. It was now 16:00.[1]:23 The CVR recorded the following final moments:

Records: "Close 'em off."
Haynes: "Left turn."
Records: "Pull 'em off"
Fitch: "Nah, I can't pull 'em off or we'll lose it, that's what's turning ya."
Unidentified: "Okay."
Fitch: "Here we go!"
Haynes: "Left, Left throttle, left, left, left, left, left, left, left, left, left, left, left!"
GPWS: "Whoop whoop pull up. Whoop whoop pull up. Whoop whoop pull up."
Haynes: "Everybody stay in brace!"
GPWS: "Whoop whoop pull up."
Haynes: "God!"
[Sound of impact, end of recording]

There was not enough time for the flight crew to react. The tip of the right wing hit the runway first, spilling fuel, which ignited immediately. The tail section broke off from the force of the impact, and the rest of the aircraft bounced several times, shedding the landing gear and engine nacelles and breaking the fuselage into several main pieces. On the final impact, the right wing was shorn off and the main part of the aircraft skidded sideways, rolled over onto its back, and slid to a stop upside-down in a corn field to the right of Runway 22. Witnesses reported that the aircraft "cartwheeled" end-over-end, but the investigation did not confirm this.[1] The reports were due to misinterpretation of the video of the crash that showed the flaming right wing tumbling end-over-end and the intact left wing, still attached to the fuselage, rolling up and over as the fuselage flipped over.

Injuries and deathsEdit

Locations of passengers indicated by lack of injury, severity of injury, and reason of death from the NTSB report

Of the 296 people on board, 111 died. Most were killed by injuries sustained in the multiple impacts, but 35 people in the middle fuselage section directly above the fuel tanks died from smoke inhalation in the post-crash fire. Of those, 24 had no traumatic blunt-force injuries. The majority of the 185 survivors were seated behind first class and ahead of the wings.[9] Many passengers were able to walk out through the ruptures to the structure.

Of all of the passengers:[1]

  • 35 died because of smoke inhalation (none were in first class).
  • 76 died for reasons other than smoke inhalation (17 in first class).
  • 1 died 31 days after the crash.
  • 47 were seriously injured (eight in first class).
  • 125 had minor injuries (one in first class).
  • 13 had no injuries (none in first class).

The passengers who died for reasons other than smoke inhalation were seated in rows 1–4, 24–25 and 28–38. Passengers who died because of smoke inhalation were seated in rows 14, 16 and 22–30. The person assigned to 20H moved to an unknown seat and died of smoke inhalation.

One crash survivor died 31 days after the accident; he was classified according to NTSB regulations as a survivor with serious injuries.[1]

Fifty-two children, including four "lap children" without their own seats, were on board the flight because of the United Airlines "Children's Day" promotion. Eleven children, including one lap child, died.[16] Many of the children were traveling alone.[17]

It was not until 35 minutes after the crash that rescuers identified the debris that was the remains of the cockpit, with the four pilots alive inside. All four recovered from their injuries and eventually returned to flight duty.[5]


The tail section of the crashed airliner

The rear engine's fan disk and blade assembly – approximately 8 feet (2.4 m) across – could not be located at the accident scene[1] despite an extensive search. The engine's manufacturer, General Electric, offered rewards of $50,000 for the disk and $1,000 for each fan blade.[18] Three months after the crash, a farmer discovered most of the fan disk, with several blades still attached, in her cornfield.[18] The rest of the fan disk and most of the additional blades were later found nearby.

The NTSB determined that the probable cause of this accident was the inadequate consideration given to human factors, and limitations in the inspection and quality control procedures used by United Airlines' engine overhaul facility. These resulted in the failure to detect a fatigue crack originating from a previously undetected metallurgical defect located in a critical area of the titanium-alloy stage-1 fan disk that was manufactured by General Electric Aircraft Engines. The uncontained manner in which the engine failed resulted in high-speed metal fragments being hurled from the engine; these fragments penetrated the hydraulic lines of all three independent hydraulic systems on board the aircraft, which rapidly lost their hydraulic fluid. The subsequent catastrophic disintegration of the disk resulted in the liberation of debris in a pattern of distribution and with energy levels that exceeded the level of protection provided by design features of the hydraulic systems that operate the DC-10's flight controls; the flight crew lost its ability to operate nearly all of them.

Despite these losses, the crew was able to attain and then maintain limited control by using the throttles to adjust thrust to the remaining wing-mounted engines. By using each engine independently, the crew made rough steering adjustments, and by using the engines together they were able to roughly adjust altitude. The crew guided the crippled jet to Sioux Gateway Airport and lined it up for landing on one of the runways. Without the use of flaps and slats, they were unable to slow down for landing, and were forced to attempt landing at a very high ground speed. The aircraft also landed at an extremely high rate of descent because of the inability to flare (reduce the rate of descent before touchdown by increasing pitch). As a result, upon touchdown the aircraft broke apart, rolled over and caught fire. The largest section came to rest in a cornfield next to the runway. Despite the ferocity of the accident, 185 (62.5%) passengers and crew survived owing to a variety of factors including the relatively controlled manner of the crash and the early notification of emergency services.[1][2]

Failed componentEdit

The fracture is clearly visible in the recovered fan disk from the center engine of UAL 232.

The investigation, while praising the actions of the flight crew for saving lives, would later identify the cause of the accident as a failure by United Airlines maintenance processes and personnel to detect an existing fatigue crack.[1] The Probable Cause in the report by the NTSB read as follows:

The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the inadequate consideration given to human factors limitations in the inspection and quality control procedures used by United Airlines' engine overhaul facility which resulted in the failure to detect a fatigue crack originating from a previously undetected metallurgical defect located in a critical area of the stage 1 fan disk that was manufactured by General Electric Aircraft Engines. The subsequent catastrophic disintegration of the disk resulted in the liberation of debris in a pattern of distribution and with energy levels that exceeded the level of protection provided by design features of the hydraulic systems that operate the DC-10's flight controls.[1]

Post-crash analysis of the crack surfaces showed the presence of a penetrating fluorescent dye used to detect cracks during maintenance. The presence of the dye indicated that the crack was present and should have been detected at a prior inspection. The detection failure arose from poor attention to human factors in United Airlines' specification of maintenance processes.[1]

Investigators discovered an impurity and fatigue crack in the disk. Titanium reacts with air when melted, which creates impurities which can initiate fatigue cracks like that found in the crash disk. To prevent this, the ingot that would become the fan disk was formed using a "double vacuum" process: the raw materials were melted together in a vacuum, allowed to cool and solidify, then melted in a vacuum once more. After the double vacuum process, the ingot was shaped into a billet, a sausage-like form about 16 inches in diameter, and tested using ultrasound to look for defects. Defects were located and the ingot was further processed to remove them, but some contamination remained. GE later added a third vacuum-forming stage because of their investigation into failing rotating titanium engine parts.[1]

The contamination caused what is known as a hard alpha inclusion, where a contaminant particle in a metal alloy causes the metal around it to become brittle. The brittle titanium around the impurity then cracked during forging and fell out during final machining, leaving a cavity with microscopic cracks at the edges. For the next 18 years, the crack grew slightly each time the engine was powered up and brought to operating temperature. Eventually the crack broke open, causing the disk to fail.[1]

The origins of the crash disk are uncertain because of significant irregularities and gaps, noted in the NTSB report, in the manufacturing records of GE Aircraft Engines (GEAE) and its suppliers.[1] Records found after the accident indicated that two rough-machined forgings having the serial number of the crash disk had been routed through GEAE manufacturing. Records indicated that Alcoa supplied GE with TIMET titanium forgings for one disk with the serial number of the crash disk. Some records show that this disk “was rejected for an unsatisfactory ultrasonic indication”, that an outside lab performed an ultrasound inspection of this disk, that this disk was subsequently returned to GE, and that this disk should have been scrapped. The FAA report stated “There is no record of warranty claim by GEAE for defective material and no record of any credit for GEAE processed by Alcoa or TIMET”.[1]

GE records of the second disk having the serial number of the crash disk indicate that it was made with an RMI titanium billet supplied by Alcoa. Research of GE records showed no other titanium parts were manufactured at GE from this RMI titanium billet during the period of 1969 to 1990. GE records indicate that final finishing and inspection of the crash disk were completed on December 11, 1971. Alcoa records indicate that this RMI titanium billet was first cut in 1972 and that all forgings made from this material were for airframe parts.[1] If the Alcoa records were accurate, the RMI titanium could not have been used to manufacture the crash disk, indicating that the initially rejected TIMET disk with “an unsatisfactory ultrasonic indication” was the crash disk.

CF6 engines like that containing the crash disk were used to power many civilian and military aircraft at the time of the crash. Due to concerns that the accident could recur, a large number of disks that were in service were examined by ultrasound for indications of defects. The fan disks on at least two other engines were found to have defects like that of the crash disk. Prioritization and efficiency of inspections of the many engines under suspicion would have been aided by determination of the titanium source of the crash disk. Chemical analyses of the crash disk intended to determine its source were inconclusive. The NTSB report stated that if examined disks were not from the same source, “the records on a large number of GEAE disks are suspect. It also means that any AD (Airworthiness Directive) action that is based on the serial number of a disk could fail to have its intended effect because suspect disks could remain in service.”[1] The FAA report did not explicitly address the impact of these uncertainties on operations of military aircraft that might have contained a suspect disk.

Influence on the industryEdit

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation, after reconstructions of the accident in flight simulators, deemed that training for such an event involved too many factors to be practical. While some level of control was possible, no precision could be achieved, and a landing under these conditions was stated to be "a highly random event".[1] Expert pilots were unable to reproduce a survivable landing; according to a United pilot who flew with Fitch, "Most of the simulations never even made it close to the ground".[19] The NTSB stated that "under the circumstances the UAL (United Airlines) flight crew performance was highly commendable and greatly exceeded reasonable expectations."[1]

Because this type of aircraft control (with loss of control surfaces) is difficult for humans to achieve, some researchers have attempted to integrate this control ability into the computers of fly-by-wire aircraft. Early attempts to add the ability to real airplanes were not very successful; the software was based on experiments conducted in flight simulators where jet engines are usually modeled as "perfect" devices with exactly the same thrust on each engine, a linear relationship between throttle setting and thrust, and instantaneous response to input. Later, computer models were updated to account for these factors, and planes have been successfully flown with this software installed.[20]

Titanium processingEdit

The manufacturing process for titanium was changed in order to eliminate the type of gaseous anomaly that served as the starting point for the crack. Newer batches of titanium use much higher melting temperatures and a "triple vacuum" process in an attempt to eliminate such impurities.[21][failed verification]

Aircraft designsEdit

Newer aircraft designs such as the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 have incorporated hydraulic fuses to isolate a punctured section and prevent a total loss of hydraulic fluid. Following the UAL 232 accident, such fuses were installed in the number 3 hydraulic system in the area below the number 2 engine on all DC-10 aircraft to ensure sufficient control capability remained if all three hydraulic system lines should be damaged in the tail area.[9] Although elevator and rudder control would be lost, the aircrew would still be able to control the aircraft's pitch (up and down) with stabilizer trim, and would be able to control roll (left and right) with some of the aircraft's ailerons and spoilers. Although not an ideal situation, the system provides a greater measure of control than was available to the crew of United 232.

It is still possible to lose all three hydraulic systems if serious damage occurs elsewhere, as nearly happened to a cargo airliner in 2002 during takeoff when a main-gear tire exploded in the wheel well. The damage in the left wing area caused total loss of pressure from the #1 and the #2 hydraulic systems. The #3 system was dented but not penetrated.[22]

Restraints for childrenEdit

Of the four children deemed too young to require seats of their own ("lap children"), one died from smoke inhalation.[1] The NTSB added a safety recommendation to the FAA on its "List of Most Wanted Safety Improvements" in May 1999 suggesting a requirement for children under two years old to be safely restrained, which was removed in November 2006.[23][24] The accident sparked a campaign led by United Flight 232's senior flight attendant, Jan Brown Lohr, for all children to have seats on aircraft.[25] Though it is no longer on the "most wanted" list, aircraft restraints for children under two is still recommended practice by the NTSB and FAA, though it is not required by the FAA as of May 2016.[26][27] The NTSB asked the International Civil Aviation Organization to make this a requirement in September 2013.[28]

Crew resource managementEdit

The accident has since become a prime example of successful crew resource management.[29][19] For much of aviation's history, the captain was considered the final authority, and crews were to respect the captain's expertise and not question him. This began to change in the 1970s, especially after the Tenerife airport disaster. Crew Resource Management, while still considering the captain the final authority, instructs crew members to speak up when they detect a problem, and instructs captains to listen to their concerns. United Airlines instituted a Crew Resource Management class in the early 1980s. The NTSB would later credit this training as valuable toward the success of United 232's crew in handling their emergency.[1] The FAA made Crew Resource Training mandatory in the aftermath of the accident.

Factors contributing to survival rateEdit

Of the 296 people aboard, 111 were killed and 185 survived.[note 1] Haynes later identified three factors relating to the time of day that increased the survival rate:

  1. The accident occurred during daylight hours in good weather;
  2. The accident occurred as a shift change was occurring at both a regional trauma center and a regional burn center in Sioux City, allowing for more medical personnel to treat the injured;
  3. The accident occurred when the Iowa Air National Guard was on duty at Sioux Gateway Airport, allowing for 285 trained personnel to assist with triage and evacuation of the injured.

"Had any of those things not been there," Haynes said, "I'm sure the fatality rate would have been a lot higher."[30]

Haynes also credited Crew Resource Management as being one of the factors that saved his own life, and many others.

…the preparation that paid off for the crew was something … called Cockpit Resource Management… Up until 1980, we kind of worked on the concept that the captain was THE authority on the aircraft. What he said, goes. And we lost a few airplanes because of that. Sometimes the captain isn't as smart as we thought he was. And we would listen to him, and do what he said, and we wouldn't know what he's talking about. And we had 103 years of flying experience there in the cockpit, trying to get that airplane on the ground, not one minute of which we had actually practised, any one of us. So why would I know more about getting that airplane on the ground under those conditions than the other three. So if I hadn't used CRM, if we had not let everybody put their input in, it's a cinch we wouldn't have made it.[31]

When Haynes died in August 2019, United Airlines issued a statement thanking him for "his exceptional efforts aboard Flight UA232".[32]

As with the Eastern Air Lines Flight 401 crash of a similarly-sized Lockheed L-1011 in 1972, the relatively shallow angle[note 2] of descent likely played a large part in the relatively high survival rate. The National Transportation Safety Board concluded that under the circumstances, "a safe landing was virtually impossible."[1]

Notable victimsEdit


  • The accident was the subject of an 11th-season episode of the documentary series Mayday (also known as Air Crash Investigation), titled "Impossible Landing". The episode featured interviews with survivors and showed actual footage of the crash.[34]
  • The accident was the subject of the 1992 television movie A Thousand Heroes, also known as Crash Landing: The Rescue of Flight 232.[35]
  • The episode "Engineering Disasters" (season 6, episode 18) of Modern Marvels featured the crash.
  • The accident was featured in an episode of Seconds From Disaster (S2E7 9/13/05 "Crash Landing in/at Sioux City") on the National Geographic Channel and MSNBC Investigates on the MSNBC news channel.
  • The History Channel distributed a documentary named Shockwave; a portion of Episode 7 (originally aired January 25, 2008) detailed the events of the crash.
  • The episode "A Wing and a Prayer" of Survival in the Sky (UK title: Black Box) featured the accident.
  • The Biography Channel series I Survived... explained in detail the events of the crash through passenger Jerry, flight attendant Jan Brown Lohr, and pilot Alfred Haynes.
  • The episode "Crisis in the Cockpit" (Season 2, Episode 1) of Why Planes Crash on The Weather Channel featured the accident.
  • The 1999 play Charlie Victor Romeo (made into a film in 2013) dramatically reenacted the incident using transcripts from the cockpit voice recorder (CVR).
  • The 1991 novel Cold Fire, by Dean Koontz, includes a fictional crash based on Flight 232.
  • The 1993 film Fearless portrayed a fictional plane crash based in part on the crash of Flight 232.
  • In 2016, The House Theatre of Chicago produced United Flight 232. The play was a new work directed and adapted by Vanessa Stalling and based on the book Flight 232 by Laurence Gonzales. Surviving crew members attended the play in April 2016,[36] and the production was subsequently nominated for six Equity Jeff Awards, winning two.[37]

Survivor accountsEdit

  • Dennis Fitch described his experiences in Errol Morris's television show First Person, episode "Leaving the Earth".[38][39]
  • Martha Conant told her story of survival to her daughter-in-law, Brittany Conant, on "Storycorps" during NPR's Morning Edition of January 11, 2008.[40]
  • Flight 232: A Story of Disaster and Survival by Laurence Gonzales (2014, W. W. Norton & Company; ISBN 978-0-393-24002-3).
  • Miracle in the Cornfield – an inside survivor narrative by Joseph Trombello (1999, PrintSource Plus, Appleton, WI; ISBN 0966981502).
  • When the World Breaks Your Heart: Spiritual Ways of Living With Tragedy by Gregory S. Clapper, a chaplain in the National Guard who relates the stories of some of the survivors he aided in the aftermath of the crash (1999; 2016, Wipf and Stock; ISBN 978-1-498-28428-8).
  • Chosen to Live: The Inspiring Story of Flight 232 Survivor Jerry Schemmel by Jerry Schemmel with Kevin Simpson (Victory Pub. Co.,1996; ISBN 978-0-965-20865-9).

Flight 232 MemorialEdit

The Flight 232 Memorial was built along the Missouri river in Sioux City, Iowa to commemorate the heroism of the flight crew and the rescue efforts the Sioux City community undertook after the crash. It is a statue of Iowa National Guard Lt. Col. Dennis Nielson from a news photo that was taken that day while he was carrying a three year old to safety. Memorial

Similar accidentsEdit

The odds against all three hydraulic systems failing simultaneously had previously been calculated as low as a billion to one.[41] Yet such calculations assume that multiple failures must have independent causes, an unrealistic assumption, and similar flight control failures have indeed occurred:

  • In 1971 a Boeing 747, operating as Pan Am 845, struck approach light structures for the reciprocal runway as it lifted off the runway at San Francisco Airport. Major damage to the belly and landing gear resulted, which caused the loss of hydraulic fluid from three of its four flight control systems. The fluid which remained in the fourth system gave the captain very limited control of some of the spoilers, ailerons, and one inboard elevator. That was sufficient to circle the plane while fuel was dumped and then to make a hard landing. There were no fatalities, but there were some injuries.[42]
  • In 1981, a Lockheed L-1011, operating as Eastern Airlines Flight 935, suffered a similar failure of its tail-mounted number two engine. The shrapnel from that engine inflicted damage on all four of its hydraulic systems, which were also close together in the tail structure. Fluid was lost in three of the four systems. The fourth hydraulic system was struck by shrapnel, but not punctured. The hydraulic pressure remaining in that fourth system enabled the captain to land the plane safely with some limited use of the outboard spoilers, the inboard ailerons, and the horizontal stabilizer, plus differential engine power of the remaining two engines. There were no injuries.[43]
  • On August 12, 1985, Japan Airlines Flight 123, a Boeing 747-146SR, suffered a rupture of the pressure bulkhead in its tail section, caused by undetected damage during a faulty repair to the rear bulkhead after a tailstrike seven years earlier. Pressurized air subsequently rushed out of the bulkhead and blew off the plane's vertical stabilizer, also severing all four of its hydraulic control systems. The pilots were able to keep the plane airborne for 32 minutes using differential engine power, but without any hydraulics or the stabilizing force of the vertical stabilizer, the plane eventually crashed in mountainous terrain. There were only 4 survivors among the 524 on board. This accident is the deadliest single-aircraft accident in history.[44]
  • In 1994, RA85656, a Tupolev Tu-154 operating as Baikal Airlines Flight 130, crashed near Irkutsk shortly after departing from Irkutsk Airport, Russia. Damage to the starter caused a fire in engine number two (located in the rear fuselage). High temperatures during the fire destroyed the tanks and pipes of all three hydraulic systems. The crew lost control of the aircraft. The unmanageable plane, at a speed of 275 knots, hit the ground at a dairy farm and burned. All 124 passengers and crew, as well as a dairyman on the ground, died.[45]
  • In 2003, OO-DLL, a DHL Airbus A300, was struck by a surface-to-air missile shortly after departing from Baghdad International Airport, Iraq. The missile struck the port-side wing, rupturing a fuel tank and causing the loss of all three hydraulic systems. With the flight controls disabled, the crew used differential thrust to execute a safe landing at Baghdad.[46]

The disintegration of a turbine disc, leading to loss of control, was a direct cause of two major aircraft disasters in Poland:

  • On March 14, 1980, LOT Polish Airlines Flight 007, an Ilyushin Il-62, attempted a go-around when the crew experienced troubles with a gear indicator. When thrust was applied, the low-pressure turbine disc in engine number 2 disintegrated because of material fatigue; parts of the disc damaged engines number 1 and 3 and severed control pushers for both horizontal and vertical stabilizers. After 26 seconds of uncontrolled descent, the aircraft crashed, killing all 87 people on board.[47]
  • On May 9, 1987, improperly assembled bearings in Il-62M engine number 2 on LOT Polish Airlines Flight 5055 overheated and exploded during cruise over the village of Lipinki, causing the shaft to break in two; this caused the low-pressure turbine disc to spin to enormous speeds and disintegrate, damaging engine number 1 and cutting the control pushers. The crew managed to return to Warsaw, using nothing but trim tabs to control the crippled aircraft, but on the final approach, the trim controlling links burned and the crew completely lost control over the aircraft. Soon after, it crashed on the outskirts of Warsaw; all 183 on board died. Had the plane stayed airborne for 40 seconds more, it would have been able to reach the runway.[48]

In contrast to deploying landing gear:

  • On August 15, 2019, Ural Airlines Flight 178, an Airbus A321, encountered a flock of seagulls resulting in a bird strike that caused fires in both CFM56-5 engines just after takeoff from Zhukovsky International Airport, Moscow, Russia. The pilots decided to turn off both engines and make a hard landing in a nearby cornfield only 2.8 nautical miles (5.2 km) from Zhukovsky International Airport. The pilot chose not to lower the landing gear in order to skid more effectively over the corn. Upon landing, although fully laden with fuel, no subsequent fire in the fuselage occurred and everyone on board the flight survived.[49][50][51][52] Finally, the number of injuries was fixed at 74, none of whom were severely injured.[53]

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ a b One passenger died 31 days after the accident; in accordance with NTSB regulations, he is classified as a survivor with "serious" injuries.
  2. ^ Angle of descent and Rate of descent are two different things. The aircraft approached at a high rate of descent but a shallow angle.

Cite error: A list-defined reference named "nbUAL" is not used in the content (see the help page).


  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah Aircraft Accident Report, United Airlines Flight 232, McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10, Sioux Gateway Airport, Sioux City, Iowa, July 19, 1989 (PDF). National Transportation Safety Board. November 1, 1990. NTSB/AAR-90/06. Retrieved April 11, 2019.
  2. ^ a b "NTSB-AAR90-06" (PDF). Air Archived from the original (PDF) on January 4, 2011.
  3. ^ [1]
  4. ^ "Navigating Aeronautical Safety–Part 4". November 2, 2014. Retrieved January 17, 2019..
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Haynes, Al. "Special report". Archived from the original on August 31, 2006. Retrieved September 15, 2006.
  6. ^ a b c "Aviation Safety Network CVR/FDR: United Airlines DC-10-10 – 19 JUL 1989" (PDF). Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved March 25, 2011.
  7. ^ Playback of original CVR recording on "A Wing and a Prayer". Black Box. 1996.
  8. ^ last cockpit voice recording of United Flight 232 at 0:18 Retrieved January 10, 2013.
  9. ^ a b c Job, Macarthur (1996). Air Disaster Volume 2. Aerospace Publications. pp. 186–202. ISBN 1-875671-19-6.
  10. ^ Gates, Dominic (July 19, 2009). "20 years ago, pilot's heroic efforts saved 185 people as plane crashed". Seattle Times. Retrieved July 19, 2009.
  11. ^ a b c d Haynes, Al. "The Crash of United Flight 232". Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  12. ^ DC-10 Flight Crew Operating Manual. Archived from the original on July 21, 2011. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  13. ^ Haynes, Capt. Al. "The Crash of United Flight 232" 15:59
  14. ^ Sioux City Journal "Flight 232 Radio Transcript" 3:57 p.m.
  15. ^ Cushman, John H. Jr. (September 19, 1989). "Crash Tape Shows a Pessimistic Crew". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 30, 2019.
  16. ^ United Airlines Flight 232 episode, Seconds From Disaster
  17. ^ "The Crash of United Flight 232 by Capt. Al Haynes". Retrieved March 15, 2011.
  18. ^ a b "Key Piece of Doomed DC-10 Found in Field". Los Angeles Times. October 12, 1989. Retrieved March 15, 2011.
  19. ^ a b Babwin, Don (May 10, 2012). "Pilot who helped fly crippled jet in 1989 dies". Google News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 14, 2012.
  20. ^ "Active Home Page". Past Research Projects. NASA. Retrieved June 1, 2006.
  21. ^ Thomas, Malcolm. "Titanium in Aero Engines, Trends & Developments" (PDF). Rolls Royce. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 10, 2011. Retrieved April 10, 2011.
  22. ^ "WAS02RA037, NTSB Factual Report – Aviation". NTSB, August 21, 2003.
  23. ^ "Aviation Issues". August 13, 2006. Archived from the original on August 13, 2006. Retrieved March 15, 2011.
  24. ^ "Modifications to NTSB Most Wanted List: List of Transportation Safety Improvements after September 1990" (PDF). NTSB. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 30, 2008.
  25. ^ Newman, TB (2003). "The power of stories over statistics". BMJ. British Medical Journal. 327: 1424–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1424. PMC 300791. PMID 14684635.
  26. ^ "Child and Youth Transportation Safety". Retrieved August 29, 2019.
  27. ^ "Safety Alerts Child Passenger Safety on Aircraft" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 15, 2017. Retrieved August 29, 2019.
  28. ^ "Strengthen Occupant Protection" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on January 25, 2017. Retrieved August 29, 2019.
  29. ^ "How Swift Starting Action Teams Get off the Ground: What United Flight 232 and Airline Flight Crews Can Tell Us About Team Communication" (PDF). Management Communication Quarterly. Vol. 19 no. 2. November 2005.
  30. ^ Faith, Nicholas (1998) [1996]. Black Box. Boxtree. pp. 158–165. ISBN 0-7522-2118-3.
  31. ^ Capt. Al Haynes (May 24, 1991). "The Crash of United Flight 232". Archived from the original on October 26, 2013. Retrieved June 4, 2013. Presentation to NASA Dryden Flight Research Facility staff.
  32. ^ "Heroic United Airlines Pilot Dies 30 Years After Saving 184 Passengers in Iowa Crash". Travel + Leisure. Archived from the original on August 27, 2019. Retrieved August 29, 2019.
  33. ^ Commissioners, The CBA Museum, Retrieved December 27, 2018
  34. ^ "The Impossible Landing". Mayday. Season 11. 2012. Discovery Channel Canada / National Geographic.
  35. ^ "Crash Landing: The Rescue of Flight 232". IMDB. Retrieved September 15, 2006.
  36. ^ Ihejirika, Maudlyne (April 16, 2016). "Surviving crew of doomed United Flight 232 reunites for play". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved February 15, 2016.
  37. ^ Jones, Chris (October 17, 2016). "'Dreamgirls' and 'Tempest' win at 2016 Equity Jeff Awards". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved February 15, 2016.
  38. ^ "Leaving the Earth"
  39. ^ "Errol Morris' First Person Episode 10". Archived from the original on April 8, 2011. Retrieved March 15, 2011.
  40. ^ "After Disaster, a Survivor Sheds Her Regrets". Morning Edition. NPR. January 11, 2008. Retrieved March 15, 2011.
  41. ^ "Eyewitness Report:United 232". AirDisaster.Com. Archived from the original on June 18, 2008. Retrieved June 4, 2008.
  42. ^ "Aircraft Accident Report Pan American World Airways Inc Boeing 747, N747PA Flight 845" (PDF). NTSB. Retrieved April 11, 2011.
  43. ^ "Aircraft Accident Report Eastern Airlines Flight 935" (PDF). NTSB. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 15, 2011. Retrieved April 11, 2011.
  44. ^ "Japan Airlines Flight 123, Boeing 747-SR100, JA8119". FAA. Archived from the original on February 25, 2013. Retrieved April 11, 2011.
  45. ^ "Aviation Safety Network Accident Description". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved April 11, 2011.
  46. ^ "Aviation Safety Network Criminal Occurrence Description". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved April 11, 2011.
  47. ^ "Aviation Safety Network Accident Description". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved April 11, 2011.
  48. ^ "Aviation Safety Network Accident Description". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved April 11, 2011.
  49. ^ Cole, Brendan. "Russian Plane With 234 People On Board Crash-lands in Cornfield After Birds Fly Into Engine Causing Fire, 23 Injured". Newsweek. Retrieved August 15, 2019.
  50. ^ "Russia bird strike: 23 injured after plane hits gulls and crash-lands". BBC News Online. Retrieved August 15, 2019.
  51. ^ "Passengers injured in emergency landing after Russian jet hits birds". CBS News. Retrieved August 15, 2019.
  52. ^ Fox, Kara. "Russian jet crash-lands in field outside Moscow after striking flock of gulls". CNN. Retrieved August 15, 2019.
  53. ^ Число пострадавших при посадке A321 в поле возросло до 74 человек [The number of injuries during the landing of A321 in the field reached 74]. (in Russian). August 15, 2019. Retrieved August 19, 2019.

External linksEdit