This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Why can't you people accept that Viktor Medvedchuk is a nobody these days?
editSorry for the provocation, but other then making some statements in the press Viktor Medvedchuk seems to play no role what so ever in Euromaidan. Hence I removed him from this template. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- See also my arguments at Talk:Viktor_Medvedchuk#During_2013_Ukrainian_experts_have_argued_that_Medvedchuk_attempts_to_influence_public_opinion_have_failed. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Then remove his entry from Euromaidan infobox also. NickSt (talk) 09:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
I had not noticed his name there.... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 15:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Flagicons
editGuys, let's keep the template NPOV and leave out any sort of flags like this. They serve no purpose. I mean, if anything the EU and Ukraine flag should be incorporated because of their association with the Euromaidan movement, but in no way should the Russian flag be depicted. DDima 17:32, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Restructuring
editThis template has become way too crowded and needs to be slimmed down. Now, I'm not saying we should removing anything from it, quite the contrary. I have created a draft template with collapsable sections that I think is way cleaner and tighter looking and is more organized. I've also shortened some of the titles down a tad to remove some redundancy. The same eventually needs to be done with {{2014 Crimean crisis}}.
What does everyone think? Of course, it's not final, please let me know § DDima 22:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC)