Template:Did you know nominations/Tubutulik River

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Tubutulik River's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC).

Tubutulik River

edit

5x expanded by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 04:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC).

  • 5x expansion and hook sourcing verified. However, I'm not sure whether it's a simple copy and paste error or a sign of a more serious problem, but the "Watershed management" section has both some ungrammatical text and some text that appears to have been copied directly from its source. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:57, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
  • I think the issue has been resolved. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Ok. I think the "Geography" section could still use a more thoughtful organization (e.g. it talks about where the river rises both in the first paragraph and then in more vague terms in the third) but I think all the issues that could block DYK are taken care of; I didn't find any more copied text. I made some minor grammatical fixes in the "Wildlife" section, but nothing that would affect the actual content. Good to go. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)