Talk:Zombies, Run!

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bondegezou in topic Plot, Important Points, and Characters

Find video game sources: "Zombies, Run!"news · books · scholar · imagesVGRS · WPVG Talk

discuss the base and plot edit

Dear Fellow Editors,

Please add a discussion of the mechanics of improving the base, such as the bonuses of building housing, communications, and a farm. Thank you in advance. My best regards, Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Like a novel, a discussion of the plot is appropriate, such as Project Greenshoot. Geraldshields11 (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I added some stuff about the game locations and people. Geraldshields11 (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reception edit

Hey IP. A particular area that needs some work is the formatting of the Reception section. It's a giant wall of text right now that could use some paragraph breaks and organization. -- ferret (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, that's a function of adding them one at a time, rather than reading them all and then adding. I'll have a go at it.--211.30.17.74 (talk) 22:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Help with concisely crediting both co-creators? edit

As the presskit states, and as other reportage also confirms (example), it's proper to credit Six to Start and Naomi Alderman as co-creators of 'Zombies, Run!'. But right now, the first sentence of the article says, "Zombies, Run! is a 2012 video game developed and published by Six to Start for iOS and Android platforms." and the "developer(s)" and "publisher(s)" fields in the infobox don't mention Alderman. The video game infobox template doesn't seem to have a way to indicate concisely that she created the initial concept and co-created the game itself; am I missing something? Should we use "designer"? And what would be a good way to rephrase the opening sentence of the article to credit Alderman as co-creator? Thanks. Sumana Harihareswara 20:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Plot, Important Points, and Characters edit

This section is quite incomplete and seems to be based solely on parts of season one. It might be better to remove it entirely. 2003:DD:771F:9B00:44ED:692B:403E:F656 (talk) 12:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

What about just labelling it "based on season one" or something like that? Then we don't lose what material there is and perhaps encourage people to add material for later seasons. Bondegezou (talk) 15:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply