Talk:Zach Wahls

Latest comment: 8 months ago by NatGertler in topic American LGBTQ+ activist

Comment edit

This isn't an encyclopedia article, it's an advertisement.74.72.23.106 (talk) 19:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Can you find some creditable criticism that we can incorporate? Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 18:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
I added this but it has been deleted. I find it interesting and as close to critical as I can find. It speaks to ZW's notoriety:
In June 2012, Maggie Gallagher of the National Organization for Marriage referred to the Zach Wahls effect: the impression that the public has about gay parenting "are being formed by real or media generated images of what this phenomenon looks like that are not very similar to what is happening 'out there.'"[1]
  1. ^ Gallagher, Maggie (June 12, 2012). "The Best or the Worst of All Possible Gay-Parenting Studies?". National Review. Retrieved July 23, 2012. She was drawing a parallel with the Murphy Brown effect that created the public image of a single mother circa 1990.

Then you need to continue and, either paraphrase the main points made in the blog, or, indicate that you are quoting, and include Maggie Gallagher's words verbatum. Sincerely, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

This was a question of coding. Nothing else. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Xavier talk edit

This has proved hard to document:

He had previously spoken at one other non-secular school, Xavier University, another Jesuit institution.[citation needed]

You can find sources online announcing that he will appear and even a budget approved for his visit. But nothing that says the event went off as planned. So I'll leave it here for now. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Zach Wahls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

American LGBTQ+ activist edit

The introduction currently refers to to Wahls as an "American LGBTQ+ activist", which I think can easily be misread as saying that he is LGBTQ+ himself... and unless the "+" now includes the straight, cisgendered category that we quite him as being in, this is incorrect. May I suggest "LGBTQ-rights activist"? (We can get into the question of whether it should be LGTBQ+-rights, but visually that's a nightmare!) -- Nat Gertler (talk) 16:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply