This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Text and/or other creative content from You Love Us (Heavenly Version) was copied or moved into You Love Us with [some minor editing of the lead, as this was covered by the existing text this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This and the Heavenly Version are merely two recordings of the same song. Convention is to have one article per song, even when a song is recorded by multiple artists, so these two should be merged. PC78 (talk) 07:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Now that you've said it, I actually quite agree. They really are just both called You Love Us plus on the single covers it doesn't state that it is a different version of the same song, which could confuse people thinking that it was the same single with a different cover, so these two should be merged. Johnpeel741 (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.9.102.209 (talk) Reply
Definitely merge - no reason why there should be two articles for the same song, can easily be covered in a merged article. 81.104.165.26 (talk) 10:24, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
