This article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2019. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
The primary source of content dispute here seems to be among fans of the article subject vs. those of Jessica Nabongo. Both women claim a 'first to do' title, both seem to have engaged in UPE. Valereee (talk) 13:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, @Universalsunset, not following...is who saying that, and where? FTR, no, I haven't been paid to create this article and have no COI whatsoever. There have been paid contributors in the past, to the previous article that was deleted, but none of those edits were by me. Valereee (talk) 11:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh, do you mean the sentence in the headers that says If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.? That's typical on any page that has had COI editing. Valereee (talk) 11:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
The comment "both seem to have engaged in UPE." I'm trying to understand. I'm not accusing the person making the comment. I know the pro-Nabongo crew will never let this page stand. They will say it's a one-time event, not notable, not verified, etc. It will be removed at some point for some reason. Universalsunset (talk) 13:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Based on the journal article, the Uproxx article, and the Pride article, they'll have a hard time getting it deleted. Those are three instances of significant coverage in independent reliable sources, and that's what we need. Valereee (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
This article says Jessica Nabongo is first and Woni Spotts is unverified, That is a clear case of libel because Jessica was clearly listed as second (at the time of the article) on Wikipedia. The writer never checked Woni Spotts' information. A group of travelers reported it to Mirror.UK. Now, Mirror UK is asking to do an article on Spotts to make amends. Spotts is demanding more than an article. Universalsunset (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
That doesn't concern us here. If/when there's an article on Spotts, we can update. Where is she saying she's demanding 'more than an article'? Valereee (talk) 18:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Well, FWIW, no one should be using Wikipedia as evidence of anything in court. No judge will accept it, and no competent lawyer should be suggesting it. Valereee (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I understand but she says she provided solid proof to Mirror UK. They should have at least contacted Spotts before calling her unverified. Now, they have to correct their mistakes. Universalsunset (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hm...Hidden History Museum maybe needs an article? It's only just opened, just over a month ago. But it does seem to have coverage from outside the local area. She wasn't 'inducted' into anything, the source says they have a display. Not sure it's worth a mention yet. This feels like PR, honestly. Valereee (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I started a draft and the museum isn't ready for prime time yet. Coverage appears to be primarily generated from press releases, with a single article that might actually be original. Valereee (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
