Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Travel and Tourism

Latest comment: 22 days ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Good article reassessment for Tourism in Nunavut
WikiProject iconTravel and Tourism Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

. Yes Yes I would need to kno the company and make assured Justments

Which metro station is near to chokhi haveli? Edit

One can easily reach here from Noida sector 34 metro station or Noida city centre metro station as they both are at a distance of 1 km from this particular venue.[1] Mr.D.Awasthi (talk) 11:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keisha Schahaff Edit

 

The article Keisha Schahaff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not a notable person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 67.70.25.80 (talk) 22:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anastatia Mayers Edit

 

The article Anastatia Mayers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not a notable person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 67.70.25.80 (talk) 22:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

“Visa policy of COUNTRY” articles external links spamming Edit

I’ve noticed that there’s a problem with usually IPs and newly created accounts who think Wikipedia is a place for them to advertise their travel agency/visa agency websites, opening up the possibility of leading readers to spammy, scam and/or fraudulent websites. I’ve tried asking higher ups if there’s anything policy wise they can do to counteract this, however nothing so far has been done.

In the meantime, I came up with an interim solution and that is to use AWB to add this hidden text below the “External links” sub-heading of each article: <!-- ({{NoMoreLinks}}) --> <!-- DO NOT ADD MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A COLLECTION OF LINKS NOR IS IT A PLACE FOR ADVERTISING (WP:ADV) ----- If you think that your link might be useful, instead of placing it here, put it on this article's talk page first for editor discussion. Links that are to UNOFFICIAL travel and/or visa agency websites WILL BE DELETED. IF YOU PERSIST, YOUR WEBSITE WILL BE BLACKLISTED BY WIKIPEDIA AND/OR WIKIMEDIA. -->

Any feedback on this would be greatly appreciated! Fork99 (talk) 23:37, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article reassessment for Tourism in Nunavut Edit

Tourism in Nunavut has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:16, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]