This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Did Schmidt say the various cultures had the common idea of a benevolent Creator or that they "created a God"? I don't have Karen Armstrong's book in front of me. --Uncle Ed (talk) 00:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"Schmidt managed to prove that Mon–Khmer language has inner connections with other languages of the South Seas, one of the most significant findings in the field of linguistics." What does "inner connections" mean? What "other languages of the South Seas" does this refer to? If this is what Schmidt claimed, do modern studies confirm it? (I suspect not.) "One of the most significant findings in the field of linguistics"? Nonsense: even if it is valid, and very important for Austroasiatic studies, it is of practically no significance to other linguists, made no great advance in methodology or knowledge about language in general.Linguistatlunch (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
