Talk:Whitehaven, Cleator and Egremont Railway

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article lacks references.
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. The editor who added the request suggests the following: Add a geographic map
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Refimprove? edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article had one inline citation 1 January 2015, and now it has 45. Can we remove the refimprove tag?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Res ipse loquitur applies here, so why bother? If the original tagger had any purpose in tagging other than to let others know that the tagger had higher standards than those who had worked on the article, then presumably they patrol articles they have tagged (and come back periodically to see if the article still needs improvement). If not, then why play by their rules? The point of WP (insofar as it has one) is to record information, not to allow people to play at middle management via drive-by tagging to tell others they need to pull their socks up. Rjccumbria (talk) 18:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic