This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion
I cannot verify all of the claims made when reviewing through AfC since WWD and WSJ are both behind paywalls. However, the majority of the information I could verify through non-paywalled sources. If anyone has access to either of the above publications, I would request a quick review to verify. That aside, notability seems to be meet through WP:GNG. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Timmyshin, thanks for the input. I saw the deletion but not the SPI. Would love to see the original version that was deleted since SPI was involved. As far as notability, however, I see a clear case that she passes based on the in-depth coverage since the original AfD. Comments were that the original was overly promotional (this one isn't) or that it may be WP:TOOSOON (which it may have been - but since that time there have been quite a few in-depth sources). Any chance that you have access to the paywalled sources? I would love to verify the claims made by them. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
@BD2412:, thanks for the restore. I looked at the original version was a horrible promotion piece. I don't feel it is connected with the one that I approved but the creator likely has a conflict of interest. I did go through to ensure NPOV so I don't see an issue there. I also added the photo from the edit history which was on the previous version. If there is anything specific you see that should be looked at closer, please let me know and I will be glad to do so. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
I see no issue with adding the image. I left a note on your talk page regarding potential WP:COI conflict of interest. Please read through that policy and make proper disclosure if applicable. If you do have a COI, you did the right thing using the talk page here instead of adding information yourself. Please continue to do so if you do in fact fall under the COI guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
