Talk:Waxworks (film)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Paleface Jack in topic Citation and Expansion

Fair use rationale for Image:Waxworks01.jpg edit

 

Image:Waxworks01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Citation and Expansion edit

This article is poorly developed and sourced, and is missing important information on the film's theatrical/home media releases, reception, and legacy which needs to be added to the article. The production section is unsourced and citations for its information needs to be added. If possible, this section can be expanded upon with citations given for its information. The image used in the infobox is inadequate and needs to be replaced with an image of the film's original poster. All of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meed Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a good article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC)Reply